rhino666
-
Posts
170 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by rhino666
-
This makes very interesting reading!...all of it! http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2012/723.html
-
Doesn't have to be some bloke , could be next door, and someone passing by if they willing to stay there long enough. The technology for this hasn't moved in years. It's old and vulnerable!
-
My point being if its possible to get to security of that level then getting round a noddy o2/SKY/BT box isn't going to be hard. I remember watching a TV program about how easy it is to break into wi-fi quite a few years ago.
-
The thing is there's lots of software ( some free ) out there that allows people to hack into Wifi and tutorials on Youtube on how to do it. Nothing digital is secure anymore. If people can break into the pentagon then cracking some mass produce, and overused consumer password system isn't going to be hard. They might as well go after anyone with a Yale lock key!!!
-
Brilliant and thank you so much.
-
I've just done a google search on "breaking into WI-FI" and it appears there's 100's of easy ways of doing this not to mention tutorials on youtube!!! plus some of the software to do this is free. Its madness of them to think everyone wants their crass low budget videos using software that can found on the internet with tutorials the encourage wi-fi break in.
-
I will don't worry.
-
Is there anyway of getting confirmation of this: Golden Eye would only be granted access to data in relation to Ben Dover Production films, not the titles by twelve other production companies that Golden Eye were acting on behalf
-
Thank you. from wiki In July 2012, the High Court ruled that Golden Eye would only be granted access to data in relation to Ben Dover Production films, not the titles by twelve other production companies that Golden Eye were acting on behalf of (including Terry Stephen's One Eyed Jack Productions and Justin Ribeiro Dos Santos's Joybear Pictures[74]) and would take 75% of any "damages" paid , which Mr Justice Arnold stated "would be tantamount to the court sanctioning the sale of the intended defendants’ privacy and data protection rights to the highest bidder".[75] This meant that Golden Eye would only be able to target 2,845 of its original target of over 9,000 households.[76] It was revealed in December 2012 that the IP data supplied to O2 (UK)/Telefónica Europe by Golden Eye, from 2,850 alleged copyright infringements of Ben Dover Production films could only be matched to less than 1,000 individuals.[77] I'm accused of a downloading a Harmony film NOT a bend over production. so if Wiki is correct surely they're out of their jurisdiction.
-
I've got 28 days to say 'something'.
-
Now the threats have really started. I'm not the downloader as these people have suggested. but I'm also not 100% how to go about answering either. If I've got 1 then others will be getting them too.
-
Government admits thousands of fake adverts on its new jobs website
rhino666 replied to Dilizjo's topic in Benefits and HMRC
I'd go as far as saying 90% of the job on there are fake and definitely not checked. It's a well known fact that agencies post jobs on there that don't exist because it costs them nothing to do this. Why do it? so you can approach employers and tell them you have x000 people on your books looking for work so they can be picked above other agencies. Then there's lots of old vacancies that should have been taken off. and vacancies that just don't add up!!!, links are wrong, wrong contact details that weren't checked, commission only jobs etc etc. and then there's agencies that list a job and won't tell you who the employers is! ( basically ban agencies from advertising on govt sites! ) and this how the Govt can say we have x0000's jobs on their list...!!!!! -
What actions? Personally I'd ignore it until they produce another letter specifying what actions.
-
They won't bite the hand that feeds them. Fact!
-
oh look a new one on board for collecting
rhino666 replied to toofiegap's topic in Debt Collection Agencies
"Kent County Council charges 15p per day for books that are returned late, up to a maximum of £6." I've read that sentence a thousand times now.!! Why would anyone send a DC out to collect £6 ???? -
OK, I'll get on with it and read them. Fingers crossed.
-
As the Collection Dept is part of Lloyds and it's clear letter what the money is for , surely their admin is at fault rather than me being at fault, It was the collections dept that were dealing with me in the first place. + if there is no CCA as they themselves have said in writing surely the last thing in the world I want, or anyone else wants, is a CCA giving them the right to take me to court. Yes I am trying to avoid paying but I'm doing so for a damn good reason.... I NEVER withdrew the funds and was NEVER supplied a CCA in the first place which is what they're supossed to do in the first place . I have all my statements to back this up ... but LLoyds don't want to take notice of this. EVEN when I've supplied them with the statements saying ... "where has this money gone" with everything underlined in red..... No reply! Ombudsman....he couldn't careless when I pointed it out. If I'd withdrawn money they'd have a point, but I didn't, I left the money they shut down the ac and said you owe us !!!!
-
The bank is LLoyds and the DCA is credit security and the original £1 was sent to their (Lloyds) collections dept as cash , but like I said it was sent recorded delivery and the deduction of £ is there on a statement. so it can all be backed up. Sure their bad administration is not my problem if I can prove I've obeyed the law and I made it PERFECTLY clear in the letter requesting a CCA. and if they close the complaint down that's their problem. As said ... they've admitted they don't have it the CCA in writing! The thing is I haven't made a complaint. I merely laid down the law with the DCA stating they shouldn't be processing anything without a valid CCA , who then passed it to Lloyds as a complaint( from what I've received they haven't even supplied the bank with the full letter. Complaints don't appear to get looked at in Banks, they're glossed over by some clerk who knows very little then farmed out to DCA. Could someone clarify that I'm right in not needing to pay a second time if I have evidence of paying the first time.
-
Could anyone please clarify how many times you're supposed to submit the £1 for CCA to a bank especially after they say they don't have it!!!. I've just been asked for it a second time and told if I don't pay it they'll close the complaint!! Have this documented, sent via recorded delivery and the extra £1 deducted from the alleged total. As far as I'm aware I pay once. If this banks to shut down my complaint that's their problem not mine. My whole sorry saga was handed back to them from a DCA who had no CCA ( was pointed out in a letter ) The bank insist I need to pay again with a credit card and an account no as none was specified!! Well if they didn't have an account No how did they write to me because I never put an address no or name down , just a a/c No I tempted to ignore it and see what they do... or who they pass it to next( which they're not allowed to do ) and they've even told me PO box 12304 Edinburgh EH12 9DX will supply the CCA No mention of it's the same bank or different Co Surely that's their job not mine. I've done my bit.
-
Th letters "PPI" seems to make a lot of DCA's go quite... strange that!!!
-
What the.... So the same monkeys are going over the same paper work. Doesn't look like they believe in efficiency then.
-
Moorcroft chasing Lloyds loan now sold to 1st credit
rhino666 replied to intend's topic in Lloyds Bank
Not sure if anyone can answer this but "Surely if a Debt has been sold then all links in that contract have now been broken especially if there's no CCA.":???:
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS