no the bailiff didnt call on the dates levy fees were incurred

And on the breakdown of fees letter underneath the fees there is another box that says vists and lists how many visists have occured VISISTS 19apr2010 16:58 bailiff call amount collected 0.00 (ARR) no (LEVY) no (WP) no and says this on 4 different dates on both letters its very confusing ????

No no notice of seizure or any car that can be asscioated with me because the reg of the car involved I no longer own nothing at all

In answer to all your questions they have been to my property but have not been let inside there has been no levying of my goods at all. In regards to the situation of the bailiffs the cases are active and I have paid nothing to the baififfs as I refused to pay there stupid fees I was willing to make an agreement with them to pay the fine and t5he fine only but they refused I havent written a complaint to the council but will do so asap

Hi just thought I would give you a update . I recieved a breakdown of the fees from Ross and Roberts but am a little confused on where some of these charges are coming from the first breakdown says ticket issued for not having a ticket clearly displayed debt £ 80.00 costs £0.00 fees £199.70 VAT £34.95 total £314.65 FEES 25/03/2010 debt £80.00 26/03.2010 DVLA check £2.50 26/03/2010 Letter Fee £11.20 06/04/2010 Levy fee £28.00 06/04/2010 first visit £50.00 23/04/2010 second visit £50.00 07/05/2010 levy fee 58.00 and the second letter reads much the same so I was just wondering if this was right as I thought a levy fee was only put in place when goods have been levied and they havent so is this charge wrong PLEASE HELP THANKS

Ref :xxxxxxxxxxxx Ref:xxxxxxxxxxxx To whom it may concern I am writing in regards to the two outstanding parking tickets I have recieved and that are now with Ross and Roberts LTD ref xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx, I would like the council to take back the two tickets from Ross and Roberts as the amount Ross and Roberts are now charging me is ridiculous one ticket that is orginally for £80 has now risen to £314.65 and the s econd ticket for £110 has now risen to £425.74, this i believe is unfair and am not able to pay these charges as I am a pensioner . I would like to point out that previous to the tickets being passed to Ross and Roberts that I had infact appealed these tickets over the phone to the council and the lady on the phone expressed to me that they would look into the points I had raised . Well there was no communication from yourselves at all until the first removal notice from Ross and Roberts . I would also like to point out that I myself am indeed classed as a vulnerable according to the National standards of enforcement agents as I am 69 yrs old and claiming a pension as is my wife , and to have Ross and Roberts post letters through my door in this threatening manner has put a great strain on my wife and myself. ]Department for Constitutional Affairs - Enforcement - National Standards for Enforcement Agents ]Vulnerable situations] ]Enforcement agents/agencies and creditors must recognise that they each have a role in ensuring that the vulnerable and socially excluded are protected and that the recovery process includes procedures agreed between the agent/agency and creditor about how such situations should be dealt with. The appropriate use of discretion is essential in every case and no amount of guidance could cover every situation, therefore the agent has a duty to contact the creditor and report the circumstances in situations where there is potential cause for concern. If necessary, the enforcement agent will advise the creditor if further action is appropriate. The exercise of appropriate discretion is needed, not only to protect the debtor, but also the enforcement agent who should avoid taking action which could lead to accusations of inappropriate behaviour. [/font] Wherever possible, enforcement agents should have arrangements in place for rapidly accessing translation services when these are needed, and provide on request information in large print or in Braille for debtors with impaired sight. ]Those who might be potentially vulnerable include: the elderly []people with a disability; the seriously ill; [the recently bereaved; single parent families; pregnant women; unemployed people; and, those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English. [*] [*]So therefore I would like to have all bailiff action postponed until this matter is rectified as I believe Ross and Roberts have acted improperly towards myself. I have no quarrel about paying the oustanding tickets but do have a problem in paying the exstorsionate fees from the bailiff . I would be very grateful if this matter could be looked at further thank you Yours this is the letter I have drafted to send to the council could you tell me if this is ok

From what I am aware i have not recieved a NTO and we did have the right to appeal and did so over the phone but obviously nothing happened about that as the next communication we had was from Ross and Roberts on the 25th may 2010 we had no response from the actual council to say wether the appeal had been accepted or rejected so we thought they were dealing with it but they had obviously referred it to Ross and Roberts .

sorry my daughter in law is also a memeber and was logged in when i responsded

Hi there im having a problem with ross and roberts and two outstanding parking tickets ive have contacted them by phone but have never let them in my property. When i contacted them I asked them if the outstanding tickets could be passed back to the council as they were only for £80 each but now with the charges ross and roberts have stuck on top I have now got one ticket at £314.65 and the other one at £425.74 and explained to the ross and roberts bailiff that this was a bit extreme considering that they were only for £80 each but the bailiff was hearing none of it and said they want the full amount. The letters for both tickets were posted through my door the same day by the same bailiff and they read. THE FIRST ONE THE ENFORCEMENT OF ROAD TRAFFIC DEBTS (CERTIFIED BAILIFFS) (AMENDMENT) REGUALTIONS 2003 ATTENDENCE TO REMOVE NOTICE having failed to respond to our previous notices for an outstanding penalty charge notice our removal bailiff has called today to effect FULL SETTLEMENT . parking charge notice £80 charges incurred £199.70 VAT £34.95 paid £0 TOTAL NOW DUE £314.65 FAILURE TO PAY THE FULL OUTSTANDING AMOUNT WILL RESULT IN THE REMOVAL OF YOUR GOODS. YOU MUST CONTACT THE BAILIFF IMMDIATELY. THE BAILIFF HAS THE RIGHT TO PEACEABLY ENTER YOUR PREMISES AND REMOVE GOODS EVEN IN YOUR ABSENCE this is the first letter i recieved on monday and the second was also a removal notice for a different ticket and i am being charged £425.74 would really like some advice on this situation as I am refusing to pay this obscene amount and would rather pay the council what I actuallt owe how do I go about doing this. And to add to this I am 70 years old and am a pensioner now I dont mind paying what I owe but having letters through my door threatening like this is very distressing for me and my wife of simiular age is there any way to stop this please help thankyou:mad: