CAG is about people being wronged and helping them fight back, it is not a political platform nor a sounding post for strange idea's I'm sorry but i have never heard anyone referrer to individual freedom, as a strange idea. You can't cure dandruff by attacking the flakes that fall off; you have to attack the source. The courts should not be able to bring a case without proof of consensual contract simple as that. I don’t know if there are any policemen on this forum but try and ask one how much evidence they have to supply before they can get the Crown Prosecution to hear their case, and that is for potential criminals. I don’t want to use this as a sounding board for political ideas I want legislation brought in to make the system fairer. This will not happen by winning individual court cases. It will be won by unified defiance of the unlawful and unfair system that is thrust upon us. We did not ask for it – does anyone remember being asked if they thought it was a fair system? What can they do if everyone just says No! Fear is the only weapon they have against us, nothing else.

I think you give the courts a more status and respect than they require. They are a profit making organisation and they have no force of law if you do not consent. This fear of the courts is what perpetuates this theft. Here’s the worst case senior; I go to court and I spout my twoddel – they rule against me. How do they get any money? Send bailiffs? They carry no more powers than you or me. I don’t let them in - what can they do? The police can’t get involved – no laws have been broken and a Policeman upholds common law and can’t force you to pay money or even get involved. Or I decided not to go to court – they can’t force me to go. They can’t force you to do anything when YOU HAVEN’T BROKEN ANY LAWS. How can anyone force you to do anything you don’t want to, especially when you obey the law? We are free human beings and if you don’t break any laws and don’t get tricked into consenting to acts and statutes and giving them the force of law – no one can tell you what to do and you are free to choose what you consent to. My dispute is not just with OPC but with the courts as well. They are not above the law, no one is, we are all equal in the eyes of the law – the fundamental basis of our legal system. If the courts don’t like what I’m saying they can’t penalise me for it – I am allowed to state my opinion whether they think I’m disrespecting them or not. This is not North Korea. You must understand I do not fear the courts or their wrath – I just don’t want to harm the work people have done before me.

I would like to ask some advice regarding OPC parking tickets and CCJ’s. I have a claim form from Northhamptom County Court and I am planning an unusual defence, I would like to know if you think I’ll do more harm than good. I did get two tickets, I did ignore them. My car is authorised to park where the ticket was given – but the pass fell down. My thoughts are as follows: Note: this is not how I will word my defence but it will give you a flavour of where I am going and at the moment are just thoughts. I am not an expert on the law but I do know as a human I have to follow the law and in this society it is the only thing I have to obey. Saying that, there is no law that states I have to read notices posted on walls and there is no law that says I have to consent or contract to these notices. All contracts have to be consented to before they can have any legality, while both parties are present or through signature, and always with consent. So how can OPC think there is a contract without this? There are no laws that state I have to read the letters they send me or respond to them. There are no laws that say I have to attend the County Court and there is no law that states I have to pay the money they think I owe them. If I don’t go to court and without my consent, how can the court complete a contract and pass a judgment against me? Subjectively I think what OPC do is a [problem] and like all scams I do not entertain them. Their rules allow for no margin of human error or acts of God, for example, forgetting to display your pass or the pass falling down. If you contact them you accept the legitimacy of the ticket. They also assert you have to pay the bill before they will allow you to contest. It is totally unfair and almost impossible to successfully contest if you play by their rules. If their system was fair and they genuinely only wanted to penalise unauthorised parking, then they would have a database on a handheld devise or a radio to check with a central control and very quickly ascertain if a ticked was needed or not. If the car was authorised but not displaying a pass then a note could be left informing the driver that they must display the pass and then maybe a three strike system, then a ticket. Fair? Also, I do not consent to the authority of a court that would uphold a claim from a company with such a bad track record and has no proof I contracted with them or that I received any of there letters or invoices. (not too sure about this bit) I know you shouldn’t rabble on and stick to the basics but I want to fight these edit and I don’t mind going to court so there can be an official record of reason. Thanks