Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About leilani

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Thanks for Steampowered and Conniff, as 3 of the documents have been removed, not sure your getting the full picture. Only mine left. Beginning to dislike this site, shall not be guiding people to here any more. Please remove my account.
  2. Can those who are familiar with legally binding documents please look over this agreement? I am meant to sign by 23rd Jan. I am uncomfortable with the whole issue, but even more with the agreement as it appears to have commas in which I always understood could lead to ambiguity. I have also included previous correspondence on the issue. Would appreciate advice, many thanks in advance.
  3. Could someone tell if I "have" to reply to the solicitors letter by the date they specify? i.e. 5th. Just I rang the IP office and had some interesting information given to me and I want to be able to put it in letter which I have composed, but my brain aches at moment and there's no way I am going to get it finished by last post. I am guessing that actually, if it's not court ordered, I actually don't have any obligation to reply by their set date.
  4. Yes, I have realised that Bankfodder, but I feel that's a little unfair to close the post, isn't this is after all for all to comment on? Others may have other information that haven't seen this thread yet and might offer other useful info, apart from your very appreciated info???
  5. My second communication in response to the served paper work: sent 7/11/14 Dear Sirs, Header in Caps I write regarding the above. I am astonished at the extraordinary lengths your client has gone to notify me of his demands considering my return reply the very same day, in response to his initial email (see attached); where I gave Mr xxx the opportunity to embark amicably in resolving his concerns. If only your client had employed someone to do some proper investigative work, which wouldn't have taken much in all honesty, rather than confront me unnecessarily in town on a Sunday
  6. Here is the start of the correspondence [ATTACH=CONFIG]54698[/ATTACH] first contact 30 May 2014 [ATTACH=CONFIG]54699[/ATTACH] my reply 30th May 2014 Not sure how this will come out so will just add these two now.
  7. Thank You Sadie de Rue for informational links, however I like Bankfodder am unsure of how it relates to infringement of a name and therefore their business? I have read through both links and although I don't understand most of it, what I can glean is that the reference to in "British Leyland Defence" is it relates to copyrights being breached when it comes to spare parts, and those manufacturers whom make a similar design whether based on copying the original 3d version and tweaking the design. Therefore, monopolisation and stifling the competition essentially. Which in a sense yes,
  8. Thank you Bankfodder for your in depth reply, appreciated. Can you clarify as to how you are basing this info on, is it experienced legal knowledge or information found on web? So, from your post it would appear that I haven't a leg to stand on although, through research I have conducted, and with the Solicitors suggestion that I do have a case for rebuttal, I thought I might have some leverage. Do you not feel I have a case to ask for out of pocket expenses (you don't mention it), ie I am being made to transfer my domain to someone who doesn't own it and my website would have to be
  9. Yes, it was rather full! Thanks CitizenB, have sent you PM with info. Maybe you could judge if acceptable for info to be visible.
  10. Oh dear was hoping that wouldn't be asked for as I know the search engines could pick it up. Do you mind me sending it in a PM to you? Or do you think it's safe on here?
  11. Hi peeps, here we go again. Every year there seems to be something, even though been trying to keep my head down low! So I need some advice. Last year (1 year 7 months ago) I purchased a domain for a potential get back "into work business", I purchased the domain name based on personal experience and the service provided. I checked IP search and at the time there was "no trademark" nor application for one. I had no trouble securing the domain I wanted. Upon developing the website I noticed another website with a similar plural version of my domain name although a different TLD
  12. How did this turn out Lababy? Did they back down? Would be very interested to know outcome.
  13. Well there's hope for all who hit a pothole and claim for damages. After a series of letters back and forth to the claims manager, who wouldn't budge on how much they were going to offer me...which was for the tyre and wheel only. I contacted my local councillor who was very supportive and my MP who wrote to the Chief Executive backing up my claim that If I hadn't hit the pothole I wouldn't have damaged my car. Today, I got a letter offering me the full amount I claimed for! Victory! :whoo:Of course I have to now sign that they are not liable, but hey...that's fair. So, don't
  • Create New...