Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

45 Excellent


  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. I just sent a letter and a standard PPI reclaim questionaire.
  2. Well after several years of fighting I have finally had some success. In 2010 I won my PPI claim but they would never pay up as there was a discrepancy as to how much should be repaid. I had letters going back and forth for 3 years. In the meantime I had done a sar and I raised a separate PPI claim with WF not through fos for my old agreements. I Dec I got offered 2.5k to resolve all my accounts current and old. Well in there calculation I found it was wrong so I wrote back. Well 3 days ago I got a letter which was an offer for 12k and a cheque for £100 for compensation in the delay. It seem
  3. Pudsey, reason Im interested in this is because I made the exact same compliant 2 years with the FOS after like yourself I was given false information. The result from the FOS was given to me last month which ruled in favour of Welcome. Basically MIF is not an insurance so no there is no underwriter. Welcome charge interest on the Total account balance as per terms and conditions. Welcome can charge MIF as case law proves (Southern Pacific v Walker appeal) . Welcomes policy is not to offer the fee's upfront. Have a good look on here and you'll find that nobody with evidence has ever had
  4. Hi Pudsey, What makes you think that you can claim the MIF back ??
  5. worth looking into this more, this makes good reading http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/con...OFT1175con.pdf Bebo
  6. The agreement was setup in 2005 and yes they have only ever sent us a one page photocopied agreement.
  7. Could you send me the PM again ?, dont seem to have it
  8. lol if we didnt laugh we'd cry eh lol, Separate claims with the FOS , The letter I recieved from them said the are not obliged to look at all compliants and and pick the ones they feel important. Amongst other things and I could go on and on the main point ignorned is the CCA is unsigned by welcome and the security isnt listed on the agreement. Its fine Ill just set them all up as separte complaints. Your right what you say the staff at the FOS are just normal people like us. I think whatever which way we turn the FOS, FSA and the courts are that Welcome biased we dont stand a chance, Mos
  9. LOL hey up Mark and Beyond certainly is a blast from the past. Most of our compliants were grouped together so now Im gonna make separate compliants, I also think Multiple Agreement is the way forward but not saying too much until ive studed it and the caselaw. Ill be around for abit lets resurect the Team
  10. Hi to everyone, Well its been a while and a long road and alot of stress and what a waste of time it has been. Our case was finally seen by an FOS ombudsman who have scrutinised all our cases against Welcome (please have a good read from the start of this topic, It relates to the popular compliants against welcome) and the outcome basically is all in Welcomes favour , without going into detail I signed the agreement which explains everything, had use of the money end of story. My plans now are to try to get my PPi back the case I won through the FOS 1.5 years and still waiting for paymen
  11. You go Emanevs, still fighting here, too. They have done a big u turn on me and finally admitted the figures i presented to them re PPI were right and they were wrong.
  12. If it isnt they are in serious trouble. http://www.wfs.co.uk/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12624895
  13. I was never under the illusion the Cattles/Welcome were going to go Bankrupt and disappear and here is the confirmation .......keep on fighting! http://online.hemscottir.com/ir/ctt/ir.jsp?page=news-item&item=583915836300132
  • Create New...