Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

19 Good

About swisspie89

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Hello hello, But of an unfortunate situation here and in need of some useful advice Girlfriends mother wasn't paid last month, then her company went under - leaving her redundant and with zero notice. She informed letting agent (who manage property) that she haddnt been paid, her company no longer existed and would not be able to make rent this month. They reacted very agressively and kicked off saying she was now in breach of contract bla bla. She is more than aware of this but thought they were doing the right thing by speaking to them and being honnest. Having been goo
  2. Well it's now been 3 days since he was instructed to move out and he has heard nothing. Odd.
  3. Hi All, I have another thread running at the moment about a friend of mine who has been unfairly dismissed and is now unlawfully evicted. The discussions on that thread and advice from Shelter all highlight a very interesting point and a potential loophole. I used to work for the same company and lived in company accommodation. I was advised that since this was just an “accommodation agreement” between myself and them that a lot of the laws surrounding tenancies would not apply. This included the requirement to hold my bond in a government scheme. It has now come to light that
  4. Ok, no attempt was made to kick him out last night so I'm thinking they learned somthing from their crash course in what they are not allowed to do: It's a shame that we were the ones that had to deliver it. He has a solicitor keen to help him pro bono and we will be meeting with him on wednesday. He has no job, and still uncertain as to when they will start up again with him, but atleast we are over the worst part. HQ Will be open tomorrow so a more realistic vacation time should be negotiated. Did i mention that they sacked someone before for using drugs on company property a
  5. Spoken with Shelter, Council Tenancy Services and Police. I have rights: I am living under a “Service Tenancy”. This means that I am protected by the same laws that protect other tenancy agreements. You do not have the right of eviction. A section 21 notice must be served and a court order for my eviction issued. Only then are licensed bailiffs permitted by the court to force an eviction. This process takes a MINIMUM of TWO MONTHS. This is a LEGAL matter and the police will be called if you attempt to gain access. If you
  6. The appeal goes straigh the person under the company chairman so the issues raised in the appeal letter will certainly hit some nerves. This company live in a bubble and there is a clear difference between HO staff and those on ground level. HO will probably have kittens when they hear all of this. They train their staff in a certain way that they beleive everything the company tells them - that way the company can be extra safe with sensitive issues. It works and is a good idea, obide by what we tell you and we will support you all the way. They are VERY quick to tell you that you are o
  7. Thnks HTH. That is all really interesting stuff. We have already moved out some of his heavy stuff - he is going to have to leave at some point, and he has time on his hands now. Ill call him and tell him to stop!! CAB and tenancy services at the council are his first port of call - ideally a solicitor would be great but in practice; where the hell does he get one from intime? It is a pub based job so you can imagine that he does not have money!! I have never had to guide a friend through this kind of trouble - usully i'm good at this and have a really good record with getting justic
  8. Just retured from a Different police station. They tried to fob him off again but I was there this time to speak for him (there is a very small barrier - amplified by the stress of all this!). I stood the ground and said to them: look, this isn't a civil matter, I can fax you all the details of how it isn't. If they come and kick his door in, will you respond to and emergency call - to which they agreed they would. All though there is nothing for them to report, at least we have now made two police stations aware. They both seem to think that anything related to accommodation a
  9. Thanks again for all the info guys - hopefully this is making your blood boil as much as mine. Am i allowed to mention the companys name on here? Update: He has just returned from the police station. They have told him there is nothing they can do and if his company want to kick his door in they can!! they have told him if they change the locks then he is not to attempt entering as it will land him in trouble for criminal damage. Shelter said they would probably try and say this and to force home that it is a legal matter (a very serious one at that). They said they would be happy t
  10. I would say so. I'll coin that phrase if you don't mind. In light of the only lock sepparating the public from the back of house area being broken anyway, no significant security issue has been caused by Mr X. Infact, more of an issue should be raised by the pub managers negligence in repairing a readilly accesible route to company stock. The ins and outs of his dismissal are something for another day I think. He will need to appeal the decision anyhow before pursing a CD case i think? For now, we are trying to make sure he doesn't get kicked out to the street on a religious
  11. It is neccessary for him to enter through a large double gate at the back of the pub. This gate is locked and all tennants have a key. The reason it is lock is becuase when the pub is trading, you can gain access to the kitchen and some dry stock. Interestingly, this lock is broken and has been for some time. So technically - any passing public can gain access to the pub and its stock as the gate is only pushed shut. Maybe the pub manager should get that fixed before dismissing somone for giving his keys to a friend. Giving his keys to a friend becommes immaterial if the gate is op
  12. It is outlined in his accommodation agreement that visitors must be accompanied - so technically he has screwed up by giving him the key and asking him to go round check on his flat. Probably warranted a telling off and warning at best. So they definately would not have been allowed to change the locks to his flat even though they own it and felt their buinsess was under threat? He has been dismissed for letting somone have access to back of house areas - I cant see the need to have the locks to his flat changed. I fully agree that this is ridiculous. It sounds to me that they
  13. Wow this is all helpfull - thankyou so much. He is living under a "secure tenancy" it is not a requirement of his job to live in the accommodation and is therefore apparantly construed as a tenancy not an occupancy. Yes the contract he has states that "this does not form the bond of landlord and tennant" so they try to get out on that one - however, as mentioned before; it is law that dictates the hallmarks of a tenancy agrement, not a company policy. I am told that the company are in for a rude awakening if they beleive this. He does pay rent - it is deducted from his weekly w
  14. Thanks, Just been on the phone to Shelter. His accommodation agreement means nothing. Law dictates the hallmarks of a tennancy agreement not a companies policies. He is living here under a "secure tenancy" and as such needs to be served with a section 21. If in the worst case scenario the company decide that his accommodation is a "Secure ocupancy" then they still have to give him 2 months notice. Apparantly the company are on thin ice here. Unlawfull eviction carries a fine and possible prison sentance. The manager has already overstepped some boundaries already by the sounds
  • Create New...