Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by framboise

  1. thank you everyone that helped me with this, I am attempting to resolve this matter out of court. Will say more when its finalised. F
  2. Hello Allocation Questionnaire has arrived, transferred to my local court. going to give it a go but may need to ask some questions The claim is for around 13K, which track should I tick? Fast, Multi or Small Claims? Thank you for looking in! F
  3. She now tells me she's sorted it out!!! Thanks for looking in anyway!
  4. ok I can see how it reads... another go... got an overdraft with lloyds bank (around 19% APR) barclaycard CC zero balance, Natwest CC zero balance Natwest offer 0% credit for 8 months but wont allow you to transfer it to a current account so they suggest to transfer it to Barclaycard and then from Barclaycard to Lloyds to clear overdraft. Now Barclaycard have the money and wont transfer it anywhere or send us a cheque!! Thank you for looking in anyway, sorry it was a bit of a strange one!!
  5. Hi OH is trying to sort her debts out (like me) and thought of taking advantage of 0% offer that Natwest offered in order to clear her overdraft on a bank account which is costing a lot of money - this will give her 8 months or so to get the debt cleared and will mean no interest in the meantime... Natwest said that if it is to be transferred to a bank account this will cost so the 'very helpful' telephonist suggested why not transfer the money to an emptied CC and then transfer it from there to your bank. Hey great idea we could use Barclaycard account for this as it currently
  6. I have read today that within the job cuts that Lloyds have made, 60 jobs are to go at City Park, Hove... This is Consumer Debt Recovery or BLS or SCM. Its never good to read that people have lost their jobs but I wonder what they think of Lloyds Bank now! Probably similar to what I and a lot of CAGers think of them!
  7. If it goes to court and if they win the judge will only order you to pay what you can afford each month. The only way lloyds can get a charging order is if you fail to pay what you have been ordered to pay each month (what you can afford). Are they still charging interest now ? Cymruambyth and myself both have threads where the CCA is not legible - you might like to take a look at those Also you should take personal details out and get the CCA posted All the best
  8. Thanks, despite having read so many threads and good advice here, I will still be asking a lot of questions I think!
  9. Ok well I think I might leave it then as I have given them plenty of opportunities and requests to supply this information anyway - fight them in court it will be! Thanks for your comments!
  10. Ok well I've put in an embarrassed defence as the claimant has not provided any documentation despite my request under CPR. My defence was confirmed by the court I am going to send the following letter to them in response to them informing me that they are going for SJ. dear sir/madam.... I acknowledge your last letter dated 30th October which I received 6th November. In this letter you say that you are awaiting receipt of copy statements from your client. In another paragraph of your letter you say that you will be applying for Summary Judgement in this case. You are clearly ac
  11. Thank you BB, am I right in thinking that the court will inform me of SCM's application of SJ and that there will be a hearing date for this? F
  12. This thread is aimed at people who maybe in a similar position with Cap One and friends Back in late 2008, I sent a CCA request to Capital One to which they eventually replied with a document not containing my signature. They covered this by informing me that they do not have to provide me with this as long as they have sent me the agreement itself ! As I have sent quite a few of these CCA requests out, in my opinion, if they've got a signature attached to an agreement, they are going to send you it. I was also concerned about the APR on the agreement they sent me - I seemed t
  13. Post 222 Says 'Original Documents must be provided on the day' I like that bit !!
  14. got a letter today from SCM - it says 'we are still awaiting receipt of copy statements' It also says that they will be applying for summary judgement if this cannot be settled by me agreeing to pay the full balance or negotiate an offer. So - no default notice or termination letter, an illegible document they claim is an agreement, a single page of a statement which is clearly wrong and is different to one that I happened to find in my house of the same date (neither show any actual transactions), a letter which quotes a different account number and balance and says that 'copy sta
  15. True copy means a copy of the original... surely ? They would not send you the original, this would be very stupid of them! Are they telling you that they may not have the original? Could be interesting if it goes to court... makes it harder for them:)
  16. That's what it looks like they've done, though why they would do such a thing beggars belief! The 'statements' just don't make sense either. This with a catalogue of other blunders on their part, for which I have the evidence!:)
  17. Got a response from the court... acknowledging defence, telling me to await direction etc... Been doing some digging for old documents etc and found an old statement - when I put this next to a so called 'copy statement' that **** sent me a little while ago the numbers do not correspond at all! Its a right mess! Transactions that I don't recognise for different amounts on the same date on each 'copy'...
  18. Defence is in... Will phone the court tomorrow to check as suggested. Do I send anything to SCM? (not that it will get far at the mo!) F
  19. Acknowledged service on 28.09 so 28 days later is Monday 26th of October. I will get my defence in on Thursday of this week, 22.10, just to be safe. Thanks for the help and support F
  20. Ok thanks DD, very helpful as ever... I think I am just concerned that they will try to have my defence struck out and go for SJ and am being a bit over-keen to get my arguments in! Thanks again
  21. ok so here is the standard embarrassed defence... 1. I, ********** of ************** make this statement as my defence to the claim brought by ************** 2. The claimants particulars of claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR even allowing for the constraints of the bulk issue system 3. No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered and despite a request to the claimant for further information via CPR 31.14
  22. Thanks... yes I have been following your thread with interest!
  23. Can anyone help with this... SCM have sent me the following in response to CPR 31.14: *A very poor copy of what they allege to be a CCA - the same one that is towards the beginning of this thread (almost invisible) *A copy of some terms and conditions not associated with signed part *A covering letter with a new account number (different to the one on the claim) and a different balance.(they got it wrong) Should I still enter an embarrassed defence saying that the quality and accuracy of the documentation is wrong and incomplete (no copies of DN or termination, statements...
  24. Another letter today dated 9.10.09, 4 days earlier than the letter received yesterday! Here is a copy of an 'agreement' very poor copy of something I cant even make out and the letter quotes a new 'account number' I have never seen before with a different balance (a lot lower than the amount claimed!)... further stupidity and gross incompetence from our friends SCM. SCM are incompetent and devious... looks like they are sending letters with dates that are well behind when they actually send them and they have made errors with 'account numbers' and 'balances' As you say babybear,
  25. SCM have written acknowledging my letter (CPR request for info) and unsurprisingly have ignored the request and said that they will use CPR 3.4 to strike out my defence as having no merit. (which I haven't written yet!) They have also offered to settle out of court reserving the right to show the letter when the question of costs arises. The letter is clumsy in the way it is written and starts by saying 'our letters must have crossed in the post' ! How will they have known this prior to posting it ?!!... lets hope they keep applying this level of stupidity to the rest of their deali
  • Create New...