BT2505
-
Posts
50 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Posts posted by BT2505
-
-
No news is always good news, but it can take a while for the case to be allocated to your local Court. So not out of the woods yet.
I thought that if they don't decide to proceed within 28 days of receiving my defence then the case would be stayed??
is that not the case?
-
Hi
Struggling!!
Claim No: XXX
Date: XXXXX
In the Northampton (CCBC) County Court
XXX
CLAIMANT
-AND-
XXX
DEFENDANT
DRAFT ORDER FOR DIRECTIONS
1. The order, made on XXX 2013 by Deputy District Judge XXX sitting at XXX be set aside.
2 The defendants defence be struck out.
Keep the faith Alloyz someone will be along to help.
-
Nothing to report - over 28 days since defence was submitted.
-
I am in a very similar position. I will be interested to see how they respond.
Good luck.
Hi Smug, thanks for the wishes, no news yet.....no news is good news in my opinion! I know they have up to 28 days to decide whether to proceed or not before it gets stayed so not counting chickens at the moment. However it will be interesting to see how they explain my "signature" being not of my handwriting if they decide to go forward with it:wink:!
-
Northampton forwards a copy for their response.
Ok thanks Andy for all your help.
I will keep in touch with updates when and if they happen.
-
Just made further amendment....first time you have mentioned Virgin BT
Well, now we wait - I have entered my defence online - am I right that they will contact the claimant with a copy of the defence or should I email Aplins with a copy
-
oops sorry Andy - thanks again
-
Still issued through MBNA with Virgins name applied...so who defaulted you Virgin?
no it was MBNA
-
Andy just checking, my original requests were sent to Virgin as they had issued the card - does that matter?
-
Just made a further amendment.
ok thanks:-D
-
1.The Claimant's Claim is in respect of a credit facility, xxxxxxxxxxxx provided by MBNA at the Defendant's request on 16/02/2005.
2. Failure to meet requests for payment resulted in the account being defaulted.
3.On 28/11/2009, all legal and beneficial interest for the monies was assigned to Hillesden Securities Ltd. The Defendant was duly notified in writing of the assignment and that a balance of 16632.21 was due.
4.The balance of 16632.21 remains owing from the Defendant.
Defence:
1. Paragraph 1 is noted with regards to the Defendant entering in to an Agreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim ('the Agreement') with the MBNA Europe Bank Limited...Issued through Virgin
2. Paragraph 2 is admitted but the default was placed whilst Virgin/MBNA was in default of a section 78 request,dated xxth xxxxx 2009.It is denied that MBNA ever served a valid Default Note and assigned the debt to the Claimant whilst this dispute continued.
On the receipt of this summons I made a CPR 31.14 request to the claimant dated 05/06/13 requesting a further copy of the CCA. They responded with what can only be considered as an application form which bears my signature but not in my hand writing.
The application is barley legible and is without the prescribed terms pursuent to the CCA1974 and therefore deemed unenforcible.
3. Paragraph 3 is admitted regarding receipt of the Notice of Assignment. The Claimant is put to strict proof to:
(a) show service of a valid Default Notice and proof of delivery
(b) serve a legible copy of the agreement containing my true signiture along with the T&Cs of the agreement at commencement.
© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;
4. Incorporated within the sum demanded by the Claimant are sums claimed for administration fees, late payment charges and like provisions. It is contended that such charges/fees were applied whilst the agreement was and still is in dispute.
5. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.
6. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.
7. On the alternative, the Agreement referred to in paragraph 1 was improperly executed contrary to Section 61(1)(a) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('the Act').
8. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
Once defence BT check/edit and complete the dates and check its accuracy of events. Copy and paste into MCOL (it does not require a Statement of truth) tick box in MCOL and print receipt of submitting.
Regards
Andy
Wow thanks so much for the help Andy - that is amazing.
will check and if necessary ask questions but all looks good from my end.
-
Andy, no need to apologise, I was just getting a bit twitchy.
I am available all Monday am so will keep watching and waiting to see what your tweeks are to my bare bones defence.
Thanks again
-
Hi Guys, I know Andy is busy (and has his own life!) and I am very grateful for the help so far - however, my defence is due Monday 24th and because of the lack of time to post it by snail mail, I will need to enter the defence via MCOL (hope its working) either over the weekend or Monday at latest. Assuming I can do it on Monday and not it has to there by Monday..... Should I hold my nerve and wait for Andy's welcome input or put in the defence online before Monday.
Any help gratefully received.
-
-
Hi Andy
Ok, looking back through paperwork here are the dates.
I wrote to Hillesden 28th May 2010 asking why they refered to MBNA as their client since they aquired the debt in Nov 09 - they replied 12 July 2010 with app form dated 10 Feb 05 with my sig, T&Cs and some statements.
I wrote to Aplins 5th April 2012 (in response to LBA dated 30 March 2012) they replied 19th April 2012 with app form dated 10 Feb 05 with my sig, T&Cs and some statements.
I wrote to Hillesden 23rd March 2012 they replied 2nd April 2012 with app form dated 10 Feb 05 with my sig, T&Cs and copy of DN.
I wrote to Aplins 05 Jun 2013 with CPR 31.14 request - Hillesdens replied 7th June 2013 with app form dated 16 Feb 05 with an attempt @ my sig, T&Cs, DN and "Key pages of Debt Sale agreement made between MBNA Europe Bank Ltd and Hillesden Securities Ltd dated 23 Dec 2008"
The MBNA "Signature" on the 1st 3 all appear in the same position and they all have what looks like an internal stamp date of 15 02 05 and the tick boxes have identical ticks in them.
the MBNA "Signature" on the final on - post CPR - is in a different position, the ticks are different lengths (ie longer) and the date stamp is 22 02 05. The date next to "my" signature also look like it may have been written by someone else imho.
Looking forward to your thoughts.
-
No problem BT if you could...what date is your defence due? I will be around later and we can draft something that will put the fear of God into the claimant.
Regards
Andy
As you would expect - I like the sound of that Andy
Defence is due on the 24th June if my calcs are right. Issued 22nd May??
Will dig out dates and post up - thanks for your support....I really appreciate it:hail:
-
So thats 4 and the PoC states the account was opened 16/02/05.
Couple of points that may seem irrelevant but there not....what dates and from who were the responses and which one forged the signature?
Andy
All from DLC/Hillesden - never got any response from MBNA although I know that is not uncommon. So any alterations have come from them imo.
I will have to look through the paperwork to get dates. Don't think we can trace who did it though as I have a series of letters from different team leaders all with the same signature??
Give me a few minutes and I will check dates of application forms and T&Cs received in response to my requests for agreement paperwork.
-
So how many CCA ,s do we now have? how many with a forged sig on?
Andy you are amazing - working like a Demon on quite a few posts in this forum I can see!
There are 3 application forms with my sig and date of 10th Feb 05 and one with an attempted sig and the 16th Feb 05:!:
-
ps just found another app form with a date different from above so three with same date one (CPR) with above date. Also looks like all different T&Cs
-
No BT it must be verbatim...I have just looked the the PDF....one word missed can make all the difference in success or failure.
Hi Andy, as requested the POC are as follows Verbatim:
The Claimant's Claim is in respect of a credit facility, xxxxxxxxxxxx provided by MBNA at the Defendant's request on 16/02/2005. Failure to meet requests for payment resulted in the account being defaulted. On 28/11/2009, all legal and beneficial interest for the monies was assigned to Hillesden Securities Ltd. The Defendant was duly notified in writing of the assignment and that a balance of 16632.21 was due. The balance of 16632.21 remains owing from the Defendant.
-
Sorry Andy, I thought the general rule was to remove the personal details so people "watching" couldn't put 2 + 2 together!
-
Hi Andy, the POC are as follows:
The Claimant's Claim is in respect of a credit facility, xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,provided by MBNA at the Defendant's request on xx/xx/xxxx. Failure to meetrequests for payment resulted in the account being defaulted. On xx/xx/xxxx,all legal and beneficial interest for the monies was assigned to HillesdenSecurities Ltd. The Defendant was duly notified in writing of the assignmentand that a balance of £xxxxx.xx was due. The balance of £xxxxx.xx remains owingfrom the Defendant.
Left out dates and amount for anonymity but(obviously) I will supply if required.
TIA:-D
-
Yes ...simply accept or refute their points at this stage ...dont add
So defence looks likey this then??
Defence:
1. Paragraph 1 is admitted with regards to the Defendant entering in to anAgreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim ('the Agreement') with the MBNA Europe Bank Limited.
2. Paragraph 2 is admitted but it is denied that MBNA ever served a DefaultNotice pursuant to the CCA1974.
3. Paragraph 3 is admitted regarding the Notice of Assignment. The Claimant isput to strict proof to:
(a) show service of a valid Default Notice and proof of delivery
(b) show how the Claimant has legal right by way of the Credit ConsumerAgreement and Terms and conditions applicable
© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equityto issue a claim;
4. Incorporated within the sum demanded by the Claimant are sums claimed foradministration fees, late payment charges and like provisions. It is denied (ifit be alleged) that the Claimant has incurred any such fees and charges,alternatively that such fees and charges if incurred accurately represent sumslost by the Claimant by reason of late payment. The Defendant avers that theincorporation of such claims is penal and unenforceable at law.
5. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that theClaimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
Statement of Truth
-
Thanks goodness someone has a clue what is supposed to happen - I don't!
Court Claim Received from Aplins for MBNA CC
in Financial Legal Issues
Posted
Hi all, just a quick update. I have received nothing at all from them or the court - no news is good news I guess??