Jump to content

summanotre

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    294
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by summanotre

  1. Hi,

     

    Bit complicated this, but its related to an application for finance and the reasons for being turned down.

     

    I have strong reason to believe there is bias going on between the admissions and my nominated referees.

     

    I want to know if I can SAR the university to see if the people they say they have/havent had contact with either by email, post or phone is true.

     

    Im particularly interested in emails and telephone calls.

     

    So is this possible?

    Ta

  2. Both my sons are in the same predicament - however, they are at home for the summer as it is an easy solution. Although I know its not possible for everyone.

     

    I would advise you to seek advice relating to income support and housing benefit. It is particularly relevent to you as you rent. These were avenues my sons were told to explore but in the end as I say, I just told them to come home.

     

    Perhaps talk to your student advisor - thats what they're there for (I mean they are supposed to help you in situations like this) - as well as the benefits office.

  3. Having received contradicting letters from CQ and Cap1, this is now going forward to the police as CQ are demanding money under the MC account number which they say is the 'new' account number given to me when I reported my card lost/stolen???? Id like to know when I did that - Ive never done any such thing. On top of that the number they quote as the 'new' number is the VISA number???

     

    Additionally, Cap1 are demanding repayment of one of the account numbers also.

     

    Police say this borders on deception and so I must SAR Cap1 and CQ separately.

  4. TBH I have to chase mine up - Ive given them all waaaay too much time and now the phone calls are starting again *sigh*. My time has been taking up with a possible police investigation relating to a mastercard account. All heavy stuff and my head is exploding.

     

    Once Ive gathered all my stuff and had a good read through, I may be able to post up some useful stuff. One thing I have discovered is that although all the catalogues mentioned in this thread come under the umbrella of the Shop Direct Group, they dont seem to talk to each other. I believe thats because each account was opened with their sub-companies (can you call them that?) separately and at different times.

     

    You could bury them all in paperwork by requesting documents from each account separately and then request documents from Shop Direct and compare what you get. I love to bury them under paperwork! :D Serves them right, they should operate under one name seeing as they all offer the same services etc.

     

    All this talk have got my juices going again.....

  5. Not really true that BT always win. I was on 12 months contract anyway. In order to get £122.50 refund I have to take up only 6 more months - which cost me £11.25 x 6 months = £67.50. Therefore I made extra £55.00 :-)

     

    Well, Im really happy for you - but Im still waiting for my £7 refund from BT .... :(

  6. One of my cats hangs of the ridge on my front door - and she's fascinated with the downstairs guest w.c.

     

    Many a visitor has been startled by her as they exit the wc - she sits in front of the door until someone comes out.

     

    She also cant catch anything - I've seen her try to catch a butterfly but failing miserably - sad sight!!

     

    My other cat's just greedy. She'd eat a whole tub of pills if you put it in her food bowl.

  7. Just had a check with my Cap1 Visa card account. That was opened early 2004 and it took 1 year and 8 months to get the PPI taken off my account. However, it appears I never received a refund.

     

    Then the PPI Suddenly reappears a year later and this time I kicked up a bigger fuss and they refunded a measly £69.66 and 2 finance charges of .38p and .12p respectively - that took 7 months

  8. I was on a same boat as you. Thanks to this forum and information re: important email addresses of Biggies in BT, i've got the refund of £125. However had to take up "18 months contract line connection fee free" offer.

     

    Yup. There's always a sting - by the time your contract is up you will have paid more than £125 for the privilege of receiving your refund - Its always a BT win - You lose, situation.

     

    Im so glad Im free from them....

  9. I won't go against my own morals, and start using this insulting, and patronising garbage. I'm a firm believer that the customer has a right to browse the shop in peace. And ask for help when he feels he needs it, not be forced into a conversation by some bloke using open ended questioning, to deny you a sensible exit from the conversation. I don't like the fact that we have to constantly aproach customers to the point of near harassment, so I certanly don't like forcing them to talk to me.

     

    Excellent qualities - patience, respect and non-agressive selling! You are the type of salesperson Im most likely to approach for advice/help as long as you appear approachable - as opposed to a salesperson who stands around and looks obviously uninterested in the customers.

  10. Whatever you do, do NOT threaten them physically or even verbally! You are only bringing yourselves down to their level. Rescind their ability to visit you and, if you want, follow you 'repo man' in your car - carefully - and see where he lives. It's up to you thereafter.

     

    I would never threaten them physically as it would do me no good considering my disability, which is exasperated by stress. And I certainly would not threaten them verbally (I let them do that to me when they cant get me flustered) AND I really dont want to sink to their level which is below the lowest! :cool:

     

    Vox populi, vox Dei.

     

    Well said! :D (btw which latin do you speak?)

  11. Thank you. They are sending me a copy of their complaints procedure and I have spoken to OFT & TS who have made notes if Im unhappy with the outcome of the complaint.

     

    One thing I did think about after speaking to OFT, was the fact that if they supply a SAR, it has to include comments made by the agent/customer service rep. Im sure this cretin made notes, as he seems to be unaware of some of the guidelines laid down. It would be interesting to see if he has & if so, what those may be. If they are negative or derogatory, it will boost my complaint about the treatment I received from the agent.

     

    I think Im going to send a SAR letter first, then after considering their complaints procedure I will be in a better position to make sure the complaint contains all the issues I wish to raise.

     

    In the meantime, I'll get practising on that letter!

  12. I appreciate what your saying - but it doesnt stop you from looking. Yes secure jobs are hard to find, but it doesnt matter where you go, any company can give as little as 3 months to 1 year trial period. (Im assuming you have worked there for 1yr+?)

     

    What Im saying to you is, stick it out as long as you can while you look for something else. You are obviously unhappy, and you may well stay unhappy or become even more unhappy while you work there. Thats not going to be good for your health or your performance. So you have to look at the prospect of staying in a job you really dont like because its secure or stick it out until you can take the leap and work somewhere where you'll be happy.

     

    You have invaluable assets - I dont know your personal life schedule (and Im not suggesting you tell me it). But have you thought about taking a part time course to boost your qualifications? Put that together with your transferable skills and you could find you would get a job your much happier doing - which will become obvious with your performance and lessoning the chances of losing the job before your trial period is up.

     

    I dont like to think of anyone unhappy in any aspect of their life, especially work as everything else revolves around it.

     

    Im just trying to help you recognise other possibilities thats all, because at the moment what comes across is 'better the devil you know' which isnt always the best attitude or approach.

  13. If the DCA is acting for the OC they can do whatever is in the contract between them and OC, ie they can perform the rights and duties of the OC, however they cannot take legal action in their own name. Only if they have bought the debt do they have to inform you of the assignment, if they are acting on behalf of OC only then they have not made a purchase and informing you is purely courtesy.

     

    Hi, thanks for your response, however I have been advised by my solicitor (who's dealing with something more serious for me) that I should always receive a correct NoA from someone if the debt is being passed on - in-house or otherwise. Ive also been given same advice on this forum (unless I have misunderstood that advice - which I hope isnt the case considering my perception of it has gone into several letters :-|).

     

    One thing I do know for sure, is I do not have to make arrangements with them because they dont own the debt and Im not obliged to deal with them if the OC has agreed to deal with me directly. Also having checked OFT rules, I have to go through the DCA's complaints procedure first.

     

     

    I just need help with an initial letter - and can I SAR ONLY the DCA (as opposed to SAR'ing both the OC & DCA) please, anyone.:-|

  14. [quote=micko19;2164083Quote:

    If they were however to successfully challenge I still don't think from the cursory look I have given that the document, if it were to be accepted as an agreement, is within the strict rules of CCA and later regulations. The OFT documents that sets out the regulations is a useful place to start

    http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/bus...dit/oft018.pdf

    I think they may have failed on the form and content of the document as described in the guidance. It is difficult to read on the posting so I am not sure. If the copy held is as unclear as this I would also throw in a challenge on the grounds that every copy must be easily legible just for good measure.

     

     

    Originally Posted by peterbard viewpost.gif

    10. - (1) Schedule 1 (information to be contained in documents embodying regulated consumer credit agreements other than modifying agreements) shall be amended as follows.

     

    (2) For paragraph 1 substitute -

     

    1.All types. " (1) Subject to paragraph (2) below, a heading in one of the following forms of words -

     

    It states

    CREDIT AGREEMENT REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER credit act 1974

    as peter above states it should read

    CREDIT CARD AGREEMENT REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER credit act 1974.

     

     

    Sorry to hijack, but where can I find out more about this? I requested my cca from my credit card company - should I have asked for a credit card agreement reg by cca 1974?

     

    Is there a significant difference it the regs?

     

    Ta & sorry again for hijacking.

×
×
  • Create New...