Yes slight mistake 5th May 2010

Hello, be very careful with the council as they are very underhand, they have already wasted some at least 300k defending this action and will have to spend quite a lot more in the courts of appeal. I have already made history by setting aside orders against me and being made bankrupt and keeping my assets under the three year rule and that ain't easy without out no legal council to represent you. The first thing to do is request all paperwork about you from council asap, under the freedom of information act, and check to see if council have breached your data protection rights. Let me know where your at and I can give you a more precise answer. Don't waste you money with solicitors as they are a waste of time, better to bypass them an have a QC inspect your paperwork far cheaper belive! All the answers you need about the law is very available on google ok

Dublin Vs Newham Council Please help............... I was made bankrupt on the 2nd of May 2006 at the High court London, for a debt of £4989.62 in respect of council tax and Housing benefit, from 2000 to 2001 in respect of "HB" and 2001 to 2003 in respect of council tax. The high court were led to belive that six liabillty orders were issued for these debts by Stratford magistraights court and a application for service by post was ordered by the high court. AS i had no knowledge of any proceedings at any of the courts and had never been served, i made an application for the order for bankruptcy to be annuled on the grounds that order orught not to be made on 12 june 2006, ive been in a battle scince then trying to overturn this order, i was allowed to go back to the lower courts to challenge the liabillty orders as we brought to the courts atention that liabillty orders in respect of "HB" is not possible and had all the orders set aside and a statement by the District Judge that the council are misleading the High court in proporting that they have six orders issued by this court, I return back to High court to anuell the bankruptcy but the council claim that they made payments in my name in the way of crossed cheques for more than £750.00 and because I had no proof to challenge, the registra found against me but made an order that if this case came back it should be in front of a High court judge. The council apply for a Judicial review and win in jan2007 with no notefication to the lower courts or myself and action is undefended, District Judge writes urgent letter to High Court to advice that they have been mislead again by the council, I waited expecting to hear new date for Judical review and didn't hear nothing for until last week when I recieved letter saying that lower court have been ordered to relist hearing for 5th May 2009 following another hearing at high court that neither intrested parties were aware of. Firstly the council claim that I made a payment of £45.00 in respect of the debt 1st June 2002 to make sure that they hadn't passed the 6 year rule and this is a mistake as I made no payment and they have no proof. I have been discharged on 2nd May 2007 and on the 2nd of May 2009 the three year rule in respect of my property and assets. All the information that started the debt in the first place was given to the council by ways of false claims/alegations of fraud on my part by a council employee who happens to be my freeholder as well and we have been given a report showing that the council had an informer that fed them all information that led to this debt. i was not living at said address or the owner and in a fraud report by the council, they confirm that they were aware that I wasn't residing at said property but they still continuted to make payments after this date of the report. I should say that I have been representing myself through out and intend to defend the case on the 5th of May 2009 please help. I'm am now looking to take my case to the appeal courts for a £5,000,000mil claim against this corupt injustice.

Please help............... I was made bankrupt on the 2nd of May 2006 at the High court London, for a debt of £4989.62 in respect of council tax and Housing benefit, from 2000 to 2001 in respect of "HB" and 2001 to 2003 in respect of council tax. The high court were led to belive that six liabillty orders were issued for these debts by Stratford magistraights court and a application for service by post was ordered by the high court. AS i had no knowledge of any proceedings at any of the courts and had never been served, i made an application for the order for bankruptcy to be annuled on the grounds that order orught not to be made on 12 june 2006, ive been in a battle scince then trying to overturn this order, i was allowed to go back to the lower courts to challenge the liabillty orders as we brought to the courts atention that liabillty orders in respect of "HB" is not possible and had all the orders set aside and a statement by the District Judge that the council are misleading the High court in proporting that they have six orders issued by this court, I return back to High court to anuell the bankruptcy but the council claim that they made payments in my name in the way of crossed cheques for more than £750.00 and because I had no proof to challenge, the registra found against me but made an order that if this case came back it should be in front of a High court judge. The council apply for a Judicial review and win in jan2007 with no notefication to the lower courts or myself and action is undefended, District Judge writes urgent letter to High Court to advice that they have been mislead again by the council, I waited expecting to hear new date for Judical review and didn't hear nothing for until last week when I recieved letter saying that lower court have been ordered to relist hearing for 5th May 2009 following another hearing at high court that neither intrested parties were aware of. Firstly the council claim that I made a payment of £45.00 in respect of the debt 1st June 2002 to make sure that they hadn't passed the 6 year rule and this is a mistake as I made no payment and they have no proof. I have been discharged on 2nd May 2007 and on the 2nd of May 2009 the three year rule in respect of my property and assets. All the information that started the debt in the first place was given to the council by ways of false claims/alegations of fraud on my part by a council employee who happens to be my freeholder as well and we have been given a report showing that the council had an informer that fed them all information that led to this debt. i was not living at said address or the owner and in a fraud report by the council, they confirm that they were aware that I wasn't residing at said property but they still continuted to make payments after this date of the report. I should say that I have been representing myself through out and intend to defend the case on the 5th of May 2009 please help.

Hello everyone we have a similar story, we saw a Porsche Cayanne Turbo on ebay in the classified section and we contacted the dealer to see if they would want to do a swap for our 911 c4 convirtable, the dealer wanted to do the deal and swaped and we paid 3000 cash, it wasn't till a couple of months later we became aware of the fact that our car had a large amount of finance taken out on it four months before we swaped, and we have tried to contact the dealer but with no luck, and when we first checked the HPI the car showed finance and we advised the dealer and he said he would deal with it and before the swap happed we done another HPI and the car was clear. we are lead to belive that if we can prove that dealer was aware of finance on this car before the sale then the law has been broken and we should contact the police as this is fraud and deception and that we would get our 911 back and hand the Turbo to the finance company or the police, please help. Thankyou