squirlyline
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
130 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by squirlyline
-
Nice touch TGS! I would have put it in those terms too.. in fact I think I pretty much did on mine Interesting stuff, well done on unearthing this! This will keep the confidence going in taking them on.. and down! Would love to have seen the content in the letter, perhaps a redacted version (for liability's sake) would be good or maybe PM me .. ok just spotted the new letter you posted on the next page so don't worry unless it is significantly different! Keep up the good work!
-
Congratulations, well done for sticking it out! Thanks from me too.. on getting back on this! All this extra information and points made help in future handling of potential further procedures and hearings. Particularly picking up on the fact of a lack of parking bay demarcation along the sides of the road to complement the request to park on the signage. I have not heard for a little while now, since the last threat sent with their 'case' evidence package (which is pitiful in its conviction anyway); mine is issued with only a paltry 2 mins contravention. I can't see how they can continue to prosecute at these late stages as they have evidently lost both many cases and presumably the costs of processing them for either themselves or their clients. If there is an opportunity to counter on them and it adds up, I would give it a go, they definitely deserve it!
-
I was just wondering if there is any need to reply to this last letter (as it is not an LBA).. I presume not, or just leave it till they feel like wasting more money on the cause and send me further demands? Also just to highlight one of the contradictions I was referring to earlier; at the end of the letter it offers me 60 days to pay up and then goes on to give me only 30 days, does this give them less credence from a legal perspective?
-
Hi again, looks like Gallstones are back for another round in the ring... it appears these guys just can't get enough being slapped around and wasting paper! In my opinion there are a couple of glaring contradictions in their cover letter to me. Plus inviting me to come in and be fined is a bit weird! They also inserted a 3rd photo of the car spanning the immense period of 2 minutes. Gladstones_demand_w_evidence_dated150520.pdf
-
Got the slimmed-down version, thanks to dx100uk (as adjusted in my relevant post above), handed in this morning at the mobile post office; and no mention of post regulations etc. Sounds like a great idea.. that may put the cat amongst pigeons! Hopefully they may start arguing amongst themselves instead Should I send both letters to them then? And would I add something by way of introduction; something along the lines of: 'I though it may be instructive for you to know that your solictors (Gladstones) cum private parking association (IPC) are misleading their clients in what can reasonably be considered a contractual parking infraction and hence chances of failure at court. Please see copies of my two recent letters to them below:...' Also I presume to letterhead with my address and date, and print name below!
-
Just wondering what you think of the letter I drafted above. I'm hoping to send it out in the mail tomorrow when the mobile post office arrives in the morning. Andyorch suggested that the Postal Services Act 2011 was the correct legislation for when a letter is deemed served; I presume it is still 2 days as mentioned above (I couldn't find the relevant part in it) Thanks
-
Thanks for your replies dx100uk and ericsbrother, I am going to reply back to them in the same manner that I received from them. Here's a draft of my reply for you to approve (there may be some contentious parts that you think should not be included here): -- Dear Gladstones Solicitors / militant wing of the IPC, I am writing back to you as I notice that you have failed to acknowledge in your letter dated 17th of March '20 (received 21st March) receipt of my letter dated '9th March '20' and have instead just repeated the same LBC statements. A copy of the letter I sent is attached for ease of reference. I am quite satisfied that I have sufficient evidence to support my position that no contractual parking contravention occurred and, if necessary, will present this evidence in Court. Now, I'm sure I have taken up sufficient time of yours reading and processing this letter to require another leisurely round on the fairways. I look forward to your total denial of receipt of this letter. Yours faithfully -- BTW I am not putting a sender address on these letters; so they can't do a RTS wrong address or something
-
Hi, I received another LBC letter from Gladstones on Saturday 21st (dated 17th), stating the same as before requesting registration and response by 31st referencing an enclosed copy of their previous letter as if they had not received my letter in reply (of course I got a proof of postage receipt)! Seems to me like they want to feign no knowledge of it! What should my next step be; another reply via 'signed for' referring to an enclosed copy of original letter perhaps? CPM-Gladstone_Solicitors-LBC2.pdf
-
I'm looking to send this LBC reply off by 2nd class post today, presuming I can get the printer to work as it is currently refusing (it will carry today's date if I do) I've attached the letter here for good measure! PS Interesting to note that they should be operating out of a golf club! 1st_reply_to_Gladstones-LBC-adj.pdf
-
I understand your derision, dx, as this field is your bread and butter and such questions may be repetitious and possibly enervating, but although I have been a member of this group for over 10 years I have not had purpose to use the site for a considerable length of time and never for the requirement of defending against private parking which demands a grasp of the small claims process and court procedures. However I have been reading around posts etc in regard to this in the spare time I have available, but had not found anything that stated it unambiguously, which is why I asked. For the uninitiated there is a considerable amount to take in, however your help is always appreciated.
-
Thanks dx, Sorry to ask this question, but I'm not clear by which means I'm to send this response; should I be registering on Gladstones website to access the instructions and PAP form as they request me to (there's no information available on their site to say how it works), or do I have to send it directly via 'snail mail', or can I just simply send it by email? Thanks
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.