Jump to content

blaser

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

1 Follower

About blaser

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. an update well i still have had no response from robinson way as far as i am aware they were granted 20 days to reply from the first of october for there case,i was given 14 days for my defense which i did .
  2. stupid me brain not in gear just look at my spelling !!thanks
  3. thanks for that , robbin what do you mean by imo thanks
  4. hi sorry i missed you last night sleeping to early morning shifts i read through thread seems to me that everyone is getting thiese does this mean that they have to restart all court action also it appears that they have added the previous court costs (which was ajourned no costs to them granted to rw )has been added regardless of what previous judge ruled . please bear with me i will try to get on pc this eveing
  5. hi is there anyone out there who knows what the robbers are upto does this mean that the impending court case is still current? as there apparantley is a new assignee and not forgetting i am still awaiting reply of my defense
  6. Re: Robinson Way Court Proceedings - Help urgently needed! IN THE NORWICH COUNTY COURT BETWEEN - CLAIM NO ROBINSON WAY LTD claimant AND defendant DEFENSE STATEMENT OF 1 / On the 27’ of August 1997- I responded to an advert in Auto trader for a loan by telephone, of which I distinctly remember being assured by the person on the other line that the P.P.I policy would pay out even though I would probably be going self employed in the near future. I was told that to get the loan I would have to take out this P.P.I policy in order to help my credit score. 2/ A few months later a fa
  7. I Have Edited The Text Now With A Little Help Please See post 88 thanks
  8. hi i did not realise that this had happened as you can tell i am not very good at pc skills . will ask my good friend tinnud to correct
  9. hi looks very interesting this will take me a while to read and understand thanks lilly white also looks like i am getting another judge next time but i will send your regards on thanks martin
  10. wow thanks lillywhite without making myself sound stupid does that mean that RW have to now provide evidence from Abbey that this was served correctly if at all. and also does this mean that the current alleged assignee R W have to also follow this course ,which there have not ?. The PPi is also an issue that helped me get this case ajourned as i do remember being told that if i take it ,i will get loan (misselling).i cannot remember receiving any documentation on ppi and total breakdown of cost etc. the dj tried to work out a figure less ppi and suggested that the figure would be
  11. hi after reading some threads i have just realised that i have not received a default notice from rw and as far as i am aware from abbey . there is nothing on my credit history about the loan or any asscoiation with abbey or rw .is these worth mentioning this in my defense
  12. hi after reading some threads i have just realised that i have not received a default notice from rw and as far as i am aware from abbey . there is nothing on my credit history about the loan or any asscoiation with abbey or rw .is these worth mentioning this in my defense
×
×
  • Create New...