Jump to content

TOMMIEBOY

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    81
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

TOMMIEBOY last won the day on February 27 2017

TOMMIEBOY had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

51 Excellent

1 Follower

About TOMMIEBOY

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Just a quick update I have managed to speak to someone from the fraud team who maintain they were within their rights to upload a fraud entry but having looked at the account again they will remove said entry. While this is a great outcome I still feel it is wrong they can upload a fraud marker because they * think* I took out an account to defraud them when it was a pay as you go dongle so impossible to get anything more than i paid for. Thank you for taking the time to speak to me. This account was taken out on 27 November 2015 for a Dongle on a 30 day commitment. You
  2. an update and so more help with the above topic, I have managed to speak to someone about the issue and it turns out I was right and the default was placed in error as I had bought the device and was on a pay as you go data plan and had paid for all services I had used. The lady from ee confirmed this and the default has been removed from my credit file. However the entry on the cifas database has not as this needs to be done via EE credit referrals but they have no phone number and only an email address. I have had no reply from them so want to know wh
  3. Many thanks my account has been closed and I have to go into branch to get my balance and savings back as they wanted to send me a cheque and it was Nationwide. If you could help with a draft that would be fantastic as I really do not know where to start.
  4. Even if that was the case it would be a case of non payment and not fraud
  5. The marker is from EE, I did not even know I had it until i tried to upgrade my bank account and got turned down and then had my account froze and then closed National Fraud Database entry filed by: EE Ltd t/a T-Mobile(UK) Application date:27 November2015 Date recorded:27 April 2016 Product relating to the application,proposal,account or facility: Communications- Mobile Phone Facility: Granted Case type: Misuse of facility
  6. It was defiantly a rolling contact because it was had to be renewed each month, I had to log onto an account and load £20 there was no D/D and I bought a data device. The cifas entry appears to say I used a bank account for fraudulent purpose
  7. This is what I do not understand It was for a data sim card where EE took £20 in advance for 20gb of data each month on a month by month rolling contract once I had used the data it would switch off so impossible to use any more than I had already paid for. If I wanted to carry on using it i would have to log on and pay another £20. I used the service for a few months and then did not renew the contract and heard no more My bank account was used for ID purposes only and was my main bank account with all my wages and d/d and held for 7 years plus, no ins
  8. It was a data sim because my internet in the house was down I bought the sim from EE and used it in a data module that I also bought from ee at a cost of £100, They performed a credit check so had to give them my nationwide bank details for this. It was just a sim card no phone or module or insurance, it was £20 per month on a rolling contract where they took the £20 in advance for the data. On my credit file they have a default of non payment of £20 dating back to 2016
  9. Looking for some advice, back in 2015 I bought a ee sim card for data not a mobile phone and it was not on a contract it was a monthly thing where as I understood I paid £20 and had 20gb of data to use. I stopped topping up after 2 months and the data stopped, after applying for a c/c I was refused and my bank account was cancelled and I was told to check CIFAS file and was shocked to find First party fraud - (Opening an account or other facility for a fraudulent purpose or the fraudulent misuse of an account or facility; or taking out an insurance policy for
  10. This is partly mine fault but would like some advice, basically someone bought a item from me and i somehow got them confused with another buyer so sent them their item and the other buyers item. Now both were delivered on the same day and signed for, as soon as i realised i ask them if i could send a returns label for the wrong. This was the day after both were delivered however the receiver claims to have kept their item and binned the other one which is very unlikely as they both had the same labels on with my return address. Just want to know if its totally my fault and just take it ( £
  11. Hi guys sorry if this is the wrong place but hopefully someone can help me I sold a car on ebay to a dealer who picked the car up and filled in all the paperwork and handed me the yellow slip of the logbook telling me they were a trader so i had to send that part off. This i did via first class mail I also cancelled my D/D for the road tax and all was good until i received a letter to say my D/D had failed and as my car was no longer taxed i was being fined £80. So i wrote back telling the DVLA i had infact informed them as above, next i get a letter to say the fine stands unles
  12. The signed notice they did have looked made up a fact i pointed out in my defense, it was on plain paper with no company heading of the OC and a photocopy signature that had clearly been cut/pasted as it was at at angle !!
  13. Really could not tell you Lowell quoted the property act and the judge can back with sub section of this and that it went over my head. At the end the judge said it was up to Lowell to provide her with absolute proof they owned the debt and the only way was sight of the deed
  14. Sorry could not catch all the sub sections but her point was Lowell had to satisfy her that they owned the debt and she would be happy to look at the deed in private as the court wanted absolute proof No the deed was the first point the judge wanted sorted when Lowell refused she dismissed the case They did have a signed notice of assignment from the OC
×
×
  • Create New...