Jump to content

jasperpad

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jasperpad

  1. Hi everyone Well here I am again! This time I have been sent an overpayment letter from the DWP. It is for almost £1000.00. I have asked for a breakdown and their breakdown figures are correct but, to me THEY are wrong. The so called debt is a period from 2013 to August 2017 …… 5 years! They claim they sent me a letter informing me of the overpayment in October 2017, a letter I have never received, because if I had they would have had my reply on the day I got the letter, something both my wife and I have done at all steps of the way with them.
  2. Hi Thanks. I am connecting via wifi, but I don't think that should make that much difference! Yes I have complained to sky and they just say that it's because we are about 1.5 miles from the exchange, but we have a box at the end of the street (about 150 yards away) plus I also know that as I am paying for fibre optic the fibre only goes to the box at the end of the street and then is copper cable from there. I cannot accept the often stated argument that because we are so far away from the exchange etc. that we will get a slower speed. For example if I turn on my lights downstair
  3. I have been monitoring my sky fibre optic broadband for about three weeks or more and at various times of the day and different days. Sky say that I should get "up to 35 or more Mb" but I am getting at best 2.1 (yes that low) speeds and I have used different speed checks online. So if I sold sky a car that I say will do 35 miles per hour and it only goes at 2 miles per hour they would demand I pay them back! Any idea what I can do? I am planning to go to them and demand them repay the last 18 months fees as the normal broadband speed is just as bad. I am putting togeth
  4. I will make a report when I have finished licking my "wounds"
  5. I got a whole lot of info from Parking Pranksters site so will be using some of it when I go to court. As I said I am expecting to win and if I do will be asking for compensation of a whole days income.
  6. Well the hearing is due in two weeks Parking Eye has submitted their claim and the photos ALL show the date as 2015 and do say that the allowed free time is 30 minutes. HOWEVER I have taken a boat load of photos of the area of all of the signs I can see especially the area they are claiming for and they ALL show one hour free. I have even taken a video of the area with a photo of a newspaper showing the date (today). In their claim they say that they follow the BPA's and section 13 states that there should be at least 10 minutes grace and as their statement says that I
  7. I have sent my response and I have until the 11th November when the hearing is due. With this is mind I have put together my response to their 68 page submission which is all based around the ParkingEye v Beavis case and my one cannot be as it is based upon them not adhering to the regulations and making basic mistakes like stating that the time allowed free is 30 minutes when the sign clearly says 1 hour, and due to your point that there has to be a period of grace of 10 minutes they are in the wrong. I am just waiting for a short while before I send my reply to
  8. I am waiting for information regarding the planning permission. I have the actual signage I know who owns the land ... Hoults Yard I am also waiting for the info regarding the contract regarding the arrangements to use the land the photo is the entrance from the highway via google maps but need time to get there to take the proper photos as I have to work (self employed) I have put the actual sign where we were parked but we were never in the actual parking bays just right outside the actual auction house who rents the property from Hoults Yard. post code W
  9. photos from Google maps of the entrance
  10. Sorry, this occurred in a business centre that is privately owned by Hoults Yard, in Newcastle upon Tyne. I haven't got any photos of the signage at the entrance but this will be sorted as I have also noticed that PE put a photocopy of what they hope will be assumed as the actual signage. The auction house is based in the site there. I hope this is ok.
  11. Here is another of the sign Hi I have got a copy of what they call their contract. It looks like a standard contract (I am not legally trained to know this for sure) but the headings are blacked out as is the name of the person who signed the contract, I am thinking it may be just a contract that has been put together. It does say the name of the site but this is in a different colour to the rest of the contract. The contract is also dated 11 December 2014 so I am wondering if the contracts is supposed to be renewed every year. I have posted the sign
  12. The date was 1 June 2016 the date of the "offence" was 25th January 2016 I have responded within the timeframe. The site is a multi company estate that has a auction house (where the vehicle was), a gym (small) and other businesses. There is a sign as you drive in stating that there is a charge, but does not say how much. the sign we saw stated that we had 1 hour free parking. (the vehicle went over by 9 minutes) but did say where the pay machine was. PE has sent, as part of their submission a copy of a sign they use but it slightly different to the one I have photo
  13. Hi all Does the ParkingEye v Beavis help in any way? I note that it tends to be used by parking companies to help their claim but I understand this is only attributable to just one only car park. I have now recieved PE's submission all 68 pages of it all. I am going through it now carefully, but not too sure if I understand it all, I assume this is to confuse me into making an offer ..... no WAY I inmtend defending this to the hilt. If anyone wants to see their submission I can scan it all (double sided so long time to scan it all lol).
  14. This what I have put as my defense on the court form. thanks PArking eye defense.pdf
  15. Just curious does anyone know how often PE wins if they go to court?
  16. I am just waiting to hear when the hearing is due. I can send a copy of what I stated if you need me to and any other info you need. Thanks
  17. I have received a county court claim from parking eye and this has now been passed onto the local county court. I have a reply to complete as I have contested their claim. When the car was parked I had to wait for an auction house to open so that I could collect an item. The car arrived at about 8:30 and the auction house opened at 9:00. the car was then moved to the entrance to put the item, a very large smart board into the car and it would not fit . .. so much so it got stuck in the doorway and this took us over the hour by about 10 minutes but reading above the car
  18. I have received a county court claim from Parking Eye and this has now been passed onto the local county court. I have a reply to complete as I have contested their claim. When the car was parked I had to wait for an auction house to open so that I could collect an item. The car arrived at about 8:30 and the auction huse opened at 9:00. the car was then moved to the entrance to put the item, a very large smart board into the car and it would not fit ... so much so it got stuck in the doorway and this took us over the hour by about 10 minutes but reading above the cart was not parked al
  19. I do think that individual claims may work but a group claim of individual claims may even work better but to be honest I really am not sure.
  20. Update Update I have literally received a reply today!! SPML/Acenden are going to review my claim within 10 days (yeah right) and let me know there findings which are supposed to be independent lol WATCH THIS SPACE!
  21. this is getting better and better! I have just (Monday) posted yet an third letter regarding my claim for unfair charges and to date I have not had ANY reply from Acenden/SPML ... I think they know they are going to have to pay so I am now like a terrier with a rag and won't let go. I have a feeling that this is going to end up in court but then they will add their and MY legal charges to me again but I have thought about this and have decided that even if they withdraw and try and charge me I will make sue that if I do have to take the legal road I will ensure that my claim also sta
  22. I have it now but can you explain what it might or does mean? I think it may mean that we who have been overcharged with excessive fees may in fact get them back leas a little but what do SPML consider to be a fair charge? ..... Interesting methinks!
  23. the fact is that for me they have added the legal costs to my mortgage and that is how they are adding interest to their legal costs. I am disputing this and still waiting to hear from them. Plus they have written to me saying that they are only allowed to go back 6 years, to which I have pointed out that for mortgages it is 12 years. Watch this space!
  24. Yes it is and I am still trying to sort out everything .
×
×
  • Create New...