Jump to content

68904

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    500
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 68904

  1. Same old crap from all 3 of these comedians.

    From the DVLA it seem they are in bed with the BPA.

    At the end of the day do not contact them , do not appeal, do not pay.

    These tickets are just as we have said before unenforceable invoices from private cowboy companies.

    Just ignore these invoices as before.

  2. Here is a scan of the type of ticket which comes out of the machine that is in use in and around Brighouse.

     

    http://www.imagebam.com/image/414313119393805

     

    This link show the front of a ticket that is in use, and the back showing the magnetic strip with all the transaction information onit.

    In answer to another post in this thread, I have a BR Free travel pass, which I validate to travel, so I never stand in line for a ticket or go to the booking office.

    I would look forward to getting a bill from the railway company for not having a ticket.

  3. Brighouse Railway Station is an open station with no ticketing staff at all.

    All tickets are issued from the guard of the train you travel on.

    Tickets are issued from an electronic ticket machine by the guard.

    When a ticket is issued, it has a serial number written on it and a magnetic strip which will identify the transaction of the tickets it issued.

    As you have a return ticket, it will be linked to the other ticket by the serial number, which will be common to the two sections of the ticket. In large type, the ticket will have a large statement saying;

    " 2-PART RETURN Printed at 10:27 on 04/JNR.11

    If you go to court, you ask for the guard to attend as your witness of havning bought a ticket from him on that particular train. I know that the Railway company will know who the train crew were on that particular journey. The magnetic strip will have all these details on it, as the guard has to sign into the ticket machine with his individual log on.

  4. If they are using the Permit Holders Only sign , then this is an NP434 sign which has to have the authority of the D for T to be used.

    Part of the permission is the use of Permit Holders Only signs, to support support the use of the NP434 sign.

    The Permit Holders Only sign must be placed at regular intervals on the effected road.

    This will allow the council to do away with parking bays along the length of the effected road.

    It will not follow that your parking place will have to have the same stipulations from the D for T as another such location where I live.

    Each location has different permissions.

    Thats why you need the permission from the D for T for the location where you got the ticket.

    That is if there is a NP434 sign on the road where the foul deed happened. Have a look at the pics I have posted.

  5. I have just been told that there is a sign at the entrance to this street saying something like Permit Holders Only Beyond this Point, didn't see the sign myself, but in any case the sign on the bay would override that sign?

     

    Looking in the Traffic Signs Manual Chap 3 dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/tss/tsmanual/tsmchapter3.pdf there is a sign Fig 7-3 Page58. It says this sign is Not Prescribed in the Regulations and requires special authorization.

     

    Assuming there is a sign like that does that make any difference to my appeal? The sign on the bay must trump that??

     

    Alan

     

    This sign is an NP434, which needs the authorisation of the D for T.

    We have seen these signs before on this site. you need a copy of the aithorisation as each of these areas are different from each other.

    The Dept for Transport is the quickest way to get this file.

  6. Unfortunately I don't have a picture. I only thought about how long the car had been there when we drove out and I saw the ANPR cameras.

     

    If I'm there again, I'll make sure I get a photograph.

     

    Why would you want to park there again, if someone treat me like that, then I would rather vote con/lib than spend my money at a store which treats folk with contempt.

  7. There has been a lower limit on the railways for quite some time , you can be randomly breath tested at any time whilst on duty performing safety critical duties.

    I have been so tested when signing on at 03:15hrs .

    I was required to supply a sample of urine, and this was a random test.

    My view is you can come for me at any time of the day or night and I will be clear of any alcohol or drug of misuse.

    My job and a conviction in law is too large a price to pay.

     

    If a lower level of blood/alcohol came in for drivers, it is ok by me.

    The less hazards I have to face of the roads suits me fine.

  8. I have to agree, I was rather frustrated that they didnt show the whole "scheme" to be a [problem]

    only glimmer of hope was that McD's were looking into a better system.

     

    Me thinks, that all they will do is nothing.

    While ever folk use these dumps, then they will just call them punters and use them as cash cows.

    This company seems to hold its customers(mugs) in utter contempt.

    Vote with your feet, and have a nice fresh teacake, butter and nice strawberry jam, buy a flask, and bingo jobs a gooden.

    I took jam and bread everyday for my snap on the big iron road for 27 years, and not an unenforceable invoice in sight.

×
×
  • Create New...