Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder

GenvievePipi

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    78
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

1 Follower

About GenvievePipi

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Hmmm, I thought I posted a reply on here. I guess I didn't hit 'post' Anyhow, here's how it went down. I had a review hearing on last week. I had asked for a review hearing, because in October I had withdrawn my initial discrimination claim (due to stress). My employers made an application to dismiss under rule 25(4). My solicitor contested the 25(4), but the judge had made the ruling to dismiss before my solicitor's argument was put in front of her. In addition I submitted a second ET case, this time for victimisation. As I was put on redundancy notice, (and was the only one in the redundancy pool) my solicitor and I were poised to submit an unfair dismissal claim. My solicitor asked my employer's solicitor about the details of the voluntary redundancy. Employer's solicitor had no clue what my solicitor was on about. HR never bothered to ask / consult their solicitor about making me redundant. My solicitor told my employer's solicitor the details of my pending redundancy. My solicitor stated that I am willing to walk away and sign a compromise agreement for £XX,XXX The next day the employer's solicitor came back and said that my employer could only offer 63% of £XX,XXX. My solicitor indicated that is was a "pretty good" settlement and that we could probably push for a little more, but not much. I said that I would agree to 63% of £XX,XXX NET -- and if that there was any tax liability that they would have to pony up more to get me to exactly 63% of £XX,XXX. So the NET amount was agreed in principle by my employer's solicitor BUT..... My employer wasn't responsible for the payout, their insurance company is paying out. So suddenly my solicitor and my employer's solicitor were suddenly both on the same side negotiating with the tight-wad insurance company. What a con this is? No wonder companies never learn and keep discriminating, they are not paying out themselves. Their insurance companies are doing all the paying out! So the morning of the review hearing we heard back from the insurance company who approved the 63% of £XX,XXX, NET. My solicitor lives outside of London so since the Compromise Agreement was already agreed she didn't come down for the review hearing. The CA was emailed to my solicitor. She reviewd it over and told me over the phone that I was OK to sign it. I arrived at the tribunal. The respondent had brought their solicitor and posh barrister as well as 6 bundles?!?! Bundles for a review hearing? I never heard of that. I initially panicked, thinking what if this goes t*ts up and I end up in court without a solicitor having to defend my case? To my relief It all went smoothly. Whilst my solicitor was on the mobile with me I signed the CA in the presence of the barrister and solicitor. My solicitor emailed over the her certificate and then everything was finalised. I still had to go in front of the judge to tell him verbally that I was withdrawing the review of my first case and the entirety of my second case. The judge said that he would have ruled to put aside my dismissal in my first case, but since a CA had been reached there were a few points of law that needed to be tidied up. (After he said tat I had wondered for a millisecond if I had settled too soon) The judge was very, very nice and very accommodating. He seemed almost giddy that we reached a CA. As we left the court room he stated that he was pleased to have another hour back in his day! Over the course of her many phone calls to my employer's solicitor, my solicitor became very friendly with the employment's solicitor. My employer's solicitor let slip that my employer's legal bill was in excess of £60,000. Crikey! I wonder how much it would have been had we'd gone to tribunal?!? I'm guessing that similar to my settlement, the legal fees, too, will be paid by the insurance company. I really, really hope their premiums go up next year! Although there were doubts about my solicitor, in the end, she closed the deal and that's the most important part for me. I paid a flat rate of £1,500 in legal fees. There is no percentage of fees that I have to pay out so I get to keep every penny of my settlement. Not bad for a £1,500 investment. And to boot my solicitor gets an additional £450 from my employer for the CA. I'm glad it's over and I'm happy I got my life back. I guess if there are life lesons to be learned, here's what I took from this experience: People are fundamentally flawed and so is HR and some HR practices. Document EVERYTHING regarding your case. Do not withdraw your case for any reason. I did it for stress, but it was ultimately MORE stressful withdrawing and having to deal with the 25(4) rule. Once you initiate an ET claim, start looking for another job. Don't wait until the last minute. It helps to talk to people going through the process as well. I have 2 girlfriends who are also knee deep in their ET cases Have the facts to back up your case. Be selfish. At a certain point, you have to concede defeat in that you probably won't ever change a discriminatory department, boss or practice - but you can get compensation for the horrible experience you went through Have faith that things will go right. Kindness, dignity at work and respect cost nothing. It astounds me that employers would pay tens of thousands fighting you in court, rather than changing their attitude at work. I'd like to thank everyone here on this forum for their kindness and support. I hope I never HAVE TO post here again. Over + Out. GP
  2. A settlement has been agreed in principle. Going to the tribunal this morning. Hopefully the details will be ironed before we face the judge. Strangely enough, my employers solicitors were never told that I am in the midst undergoing the redundancy process. My solicitor had to inform them and they were as equally shocked. Settlement talks began very shortly after that. That can't be typical, can it?
  3. My solicitor is not working on a contingency basis. She is working on a flat fee and will not get a percentage of a payout (should I get one) My employer has given me the following choices: Redundancy, Voluntary Redundancy, be hired by another department.
  4. Brief update: Submitted a new ET1 for Victimisation last month. Going to tribunal next week for a review hearing. Applied for a new job at a better company that pays £10K more and I got it Went to hand in my notice but before I could hand my boss the resignation letter, he told me that my post was being made redundant. I'm the only person in the redundancy pool. He insists my redundancy has NOTHING to do with past grievances. Yeah.... right... My solicitor advised me to quit and claim constructive dismissal. I'm not sure I want to go down that road. I think I just want to get a payout and leave. Any opinons?
  5. I have a new claim to the ET which is quite detailed. I require more space than is allowed on the ET1 PDF which submits digitally How does one deal with this?.
  6. My employment lawyer doesn't seem very knowledgeable about withdrawals. This seems odd. I have been asking for weeks. It may be a sign that I need to change lawyers. I don't have a CA. An offer has been put on the table. Thanks.
  7. The judge dismissed upon withdrawal after respondents applied for 25(4) to be applied. Respondents gave us 7 days to contest the 25(4) but the judge made the judgement before the 7 days were over- and before our application to contest 25(4) was received. I'm just trying to figure out who I should write to sort this out. i
  8. When the case has been dismissed, then the are no upcoming court appearance to point out the error
  9. OK, thanks. But what if I'm just asking for the judgement to be reviewed due to an administrative error.
  10. Hello, I would like to write to the tribunal to ask them to review a judgement that has been made. Do I write to the EAT or the ET in order to do so? Thanks, GP
  11. Ok, thanks for the advice. I understand what you're saying but... After nearly 18 months of having little work to do, I wouldn't say I've lost the moral high ground, especially after the way I've been discriminated against. I feel that in many ways I'm sharpening my technical skills and I'm learning, which is the best part. But perhaps I should do online training instead?
  12. I am currently employed. I submitted an ET1 and had case management. I withdrew due to stress. Respondent applied to get my case dismissed under 25(4) but this was not allowed, (I think). "Case was dismissed upon withdrawal." So my solicitor and I are submitting a new ET1 with new details this week. Last week my company offered me a settlement of £9.5K (net) and if I agreed it would be a part of compromise agreement and I would leave the company. To further complicate the issue, I told HR about my intentions of going on maternity leave next year. And that I couldn't possibly contemplate leaving the company if it meant giving up my enhanced maternity pay. My enhanced maternity pay comes to £15K during my maternity leave. So a few days later they upped their offer to £17.K (net). Even though they are being *******s to me at work... from a financial standpoint I would rather stay another 7 or so months and rack 7-months salary, then go on maternity leave and get my £15K, then come back 1 year later and go back on my £50K salary. I would rather do that then settle for £17.5K or even £20K
  13. My solicitor thinks that I am likely to get a few thousand more pounds and that I should be happy with £20K. I would not be happy with £20K if it means that I am giving up a £50K job. Should the case go forward. My solicitor has put together a schedule of loss for £20K.
×
×
  • Create New...