12 minutes ago, B Joe said:

The transaction will have no difference to every transaction ever took place on the account before and after I went into the bank to confirm is mine, would be the same device used also.

I am not willing to tell the bank I did not know about it as I do.

 

I am just wondering if the police would help me with this?

You need to come clean and tell the bank Exactly what has happened and Not hide anything from them, your just digging a bigger hole for yourself getting further into trouble.

Don't think the police would be interested, even if they where their 1st question would be "why did you knowingly let someone else open a bank account in your name and let them carry on using it"

1 minute ago, dx100uk said:

embedded ctrl chars# removed from 1st post

 

dx

 

That's better dx100uk , Thanks ..

BankFodder, I stand by what I posted ....

Its your fault in the 1st place for  letting someone open a bank account in your name, you even went to the bank to verify the account.

Sorry but Its your problem, your debt, pay up !

...

https://tinyurl.com/ryncxfg

..

Stu007  Working OK know, Thanks

On 05/03/2020 at 01:18, stu007 said:

Can I just point out this is Raven1 Topic.

 

fistship if you wish advice do not ask on Raven1 Topic start your own Topic for advice

Stu007

Could I ask you why two URL in post  #9 to UK Government website redirect back to CAG, really annoying !!!!!

I had to post again in post #10 using tinyurl to get to the correct website.

Look forward to hearing from you, Thank you in advance.

,,,

1 hour ago, dx100uk said:

Scotland even better.

bailiffs don't exist.

They just call them Sheriffs instead ....

 

 

 

 

I found this https://www.ukrealestatelawblog.com/2015/01/19/tenancy-deposit-schemes-surprise-decision-on-pre-2007-deposits/

About Deposits pre 2007 !

10 minutes ago, firstship said:

Moved in June 1997 AST 6 months, we have had previous discussions on this under my heading "Rent in Advance" to which you replied

FS

Cant remember previous discussions unless you post a link

You have a Assued shorthold tenancy https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/private_renting/assured_shorthold_tenancies_with_private_landlords

and Not a Assued tenancy.

You moved in Pre 2007 legislation and depoist would not coved by that act of parliament, IMHO.

Two links in the above post are redirecting wrongly to CAG !

Where it says

About 3/4 down this page, try this url https://tinyurl.com/tgo5gy3   will take you to Government website.

and next url for Section 20 notice, try this url https://tinyurl.com/vwvvjzs   will take you to Government website.

Hope you understand....

firstship.

Do you have the exact date you 1st moved in ?

Raven 1 is Pre 2007 legislation and depoist would not coved by that act of parliament, IMHO.

Assured Tenancy. AT.

http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/private_renting/private_renting_agreements/assured_tenancies

If you moved in between 15 January 1989 and 27 February 1997 and your landlord did not give you a notice (section 20) saying that you have an assured shorthold tenancy

About 3/4 down this page http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1988/2203/schedules/made

FORM No. 7
Housing Act 1988 section 20 Notice of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy.

Then it would be a Assured Tenancy.

If one of theses notices was served on tenant when the tenancy 1st started and LL would have to prove this in court, Its a AST and LL can use a s21 notice

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/50/section/20

1988 Housing act
Section 20
(2)
(b) is served before the assured tenancy is entered into.

If a LL gets a Assured Tenant to sign a AST, Signing a AST does not take way the rights of AT.

Read case law Kahlon v Isherwood.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/602.html
 

2 hours ago, firstship said:

what type of tenancy agreement do you have now?

FS

The tennat moved in 1994 and No section 20 notice was served at the start of the tennacy saying you have a AST.

Raven1 has a Assued "secure" Tenancy

And its still NO to Raven1 1st  question ....

NO

Universal Credit: Inside the Welfare State

Read on

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000f1xj

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000f1xj/episodes/guide

19 hours ago, BankFodder said:

@45002 I have the impression from the initial post that KFC moved there first and the business moved in afterwards. Of course that will be very helpful to any complaints or action they want to bring

Thanks, I missed that bit.

While I can understand the concerns of the OP,  they need to tread carefully.

The OP needs to be aware that the LL could issue a Section 21 notice to the tennnat and this may not be covered by revenge eviction...

IMHO

Hello KFC

Do you know long has this business been running for, was it there before you all moved in ?

Quote

 

Coverage.

SMETS 1 use a mobile network

SMETS 2  use a Government network, which where not suppose to know about

https://www.smartme.co.uk/technical.html

As posted early on, if you have a smart meter installed make sure its SMETS 2

.....................

Here some reading for everyone

https://tinyurl.com/sjt4v52

,,,,

2 hours ago, marksheff said:

@bankfodder . it was refunded via paypal . the balance is still showing pending and as been since the 9th oct i've always thought it was instant, not been in touch with ebay yet, as there is still the first case up and running, just to add i dont have her address, i've not replied to the last two emails as i've said i will let ebay step in. thanks 

I had slimmer problems to you and it explains below why still showing as pending.

https://www.paypal.com/uk/smarthelp/article/where-is-my-refund-faq1212

.

3 hours ago, mmfhater said:

Update 

Ico and tpos are both useless Martin quinn has said to them that the signature on the tenancy agreement is diffrent and neither have asked for proof 

The police have not given me an update on the supposed burglary or speakers that went missing that the man n van was meant to deliver  even after asking 9 times so now I'm trying to put pressure on them to tell me why they wont 

 

I'm also going to try and get him under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 as what he has done is a criminal offence

Criminal action under 1977 act would have to be brought by Local council assuming this is in E&W, under Part III, Supplemental Provisions, 6 Prosecution of offences 1977 act.

If not Sue for them damages as posted on 14/05/2019  post #3

1 hour ago, king12345 said:

Had many runnings with estate agents before I decided to be my own estate agent.

Thank you, that explains a few things !

Don't know much about data law and if they could do this when someone battery dies.

But you think they could have access to a data base like ATOC run's this https://www.railcard.co.uk/privacy-notice/

to save time, trouble and tree's...............................

Their would have to be a paper search as on line records only go back as far 2008

Whoops, On line records only go back to 2003

Original tenancy agreements

I wonder if mothers rent was registered under 1977 Rent act

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/42/section/87

If it was they may copies of the original tenancy agreements on file along with the registered rent details and application forms which would be very usefully to the Son.

Their would have to be a paper search as on line records only go back as far 2008

https://ebusiness.voa.gov.uk/err/

or

https://www.tax.service.gov.uk/check-register-fair-rents/search

The rent service know comes under VOA https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/valuation-office-agency

For E&W, Slightly different in Scotland and NI.

...

13 hours ago, tallorder said:

No notices were posted

 

The mother passed away October 2018 and locks changed late June 2019

 

The son has contract work, which is still continuing this month

 

He and I have tried daily to call but never get to first spot on queue before other constraints take over

 

No idea about county court, but very doubtful as it seemed to happen after boiler safety check 

 

Is being told to call the HA and last email reply was talk of not being tenant so can’t discuss arrears and advise not paying further rent. They want to arrange collection of belongings and (then?) issue Notice to Quit

 

It’s all getting a bit much for them, so he’s taking a sick day to go to CAB Today. He’s due overseas next Monday until September.

So No notices posted and know they want to issue Notice to Quit after the HA already taken possession illegal IMHO !

Have you told us every think ?

12 hours ago, king12345 said:

As i said previously the son is not considered a tenant because he's not registered there.

Nothing he can do imo rather than collect his stuff and find another place.

Unless he's ready to break the lock and enter the property, at risk of being arrested.

Rachmanism spring to mind reading someone posts

No one ever suggested until till know that the son breaks in !

12 hours ago, Raven1 said:

Wouldn't he be faced with court action to claim back decades of over paid housing benefit which was claimed as a single occupier by his mother?

 

If he managed to get back into the property that is - or maybe even if he didn't having drawn attention to what is in fact benefit fraud on a grand scale.

 

But OP posted this below so where does benefit fraud on a grandscale come from ?

Quote

She had been advised by the council previously that it would be best to pay for a single occupant, even though they were aware of her son

as Posted  on June 24

2 hours ago, king12345 said:

I said that in my other post, but someone here thinks that it's ok to do that and than claim full tenancy rights.

Someone still  does Not understand  How to obtain lawfully possession of a property and  Succession rights !

....