Jump to content

newmoses

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About newmoses

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. A good point that might be worthwhile remembering or looking int I asked for a copy of their planning application to Erewash Borough Council for the signage and ANPR cameras. I also contacted EBC myself asking for NPS's planning application. EBC's reply was that there was and is no planning application submitted to EBC from NPS. NPS themselves brought this up in their POPLA pack, saying they didn't need planning permission to erect their ANPR cameras, unless they installed new ones. Well, I can testify that their camera at the entrance to the car park, was situated on the corner wall of Barnados, was white, and way back last year, it was changed to brown. So there should be a planning application submitted to EBC for the new brown camera.
  2. Thanks very much - very interesting though at present, I'm becoming increasingly confused by the whole thing.

     

    Can't help wishing we'd got the original PCN's because I could have slaughtered one of them at a stroke!

  3. The incidences regarding myself, my friend,and a work colleague were all after april 2017, so your cases being march and april 2017, should be invalid as well. If you want to quote me, you can use my name. The best one was my friends Ilona Rigby, which was the one that POPLA ruled against NPS saying their contract was dated april 2017, but as there was no end date on it, POPLA could not say for certain that the contract was ongoing. It had to have an expiry date to it.
  4. Hi there.

     

    Just read your post about NPS on Cross Street, LE and wondered what the actual date of the 'event' was?

     

    We've just had letters to two of my family about 'incidents' which took place there over two years ago (march and April 2017) so your case might just be the lever we need!

     

    Cheers!

  5. I need to sell quickly and look for a bungalow or park home as I was diagnosed with Osteo Arthritis around 4 years ago, and I am starting to struggle to get up and down stairs.And in may this year,I had a seizure, so don't want to risk another seizure whilst coming down stairs.
  6. I haven't instructed a solicitor yet as there have not been any offers on the house. I don't know if the estate agent who has my house up for sale would be able to give me the address of the 2 houses whose owners took HS2 to court.GDPR brerach I would guess. I could hang on until after the review to see if HS2 gets cancelled.Certainly there has not been any engineering or works of any kind in my area,other than cable laying last year.That's it,nothing else so far.
  7. I am just outside of the HS" zone for compulsory purchase. However,I put my house up for sale 4 weeks ago, and have had 2 viewers. Both said they like the house but the threat of HS2 having framework across the road put them off buying my house. I am aware that I can take HS2 to court and get the court judge to (hopefully),force HS2 to purchase my house at market value under the Blight Order. How do I go about starting the process?. Which court would the case go to?. Am i best enlisting a claims specialist with success in this field?. The estate agent who my house is on the market with has told me that they have the feedback documentation from the 2 viewers testifying that HS2 put them off buying my house, so they would be available to the court. Apparently there has already been 1 successful case on my street, and 1 two streets down, and there is another case on my street going through the court. Any help, laws,quotes etc would be greatly appreciated.
  8. Hi Stu007.The work colleague had no previous/existing faults when he took the policy out.Apparently,the company have tried [causing problems] a lot of customers like this. Many thanks to all for their input.The colleague has drafted a Notice Before Action to the company.he has also asked his card issuer to refund him under the Consumer Credit Act.They have asked for a copy of his contract. I will update as and when he gives me any more info.
  9. NOT SURE IF THIS IS THE CORRECT SECTION SO MODS.,PLEASE MOVE TO CORRECT SECTION IF NEEDED. A colleague at work paid a one off yearly fee of £183.48 to a company called 24/7 Home Rescue. This is for cover in the event of any breakdown on boiler, plumbing, drainage, electrical, Central Heating Systems, pest control etc. it is for anything to do with the home. The benefits include No charges for parts, No charges for labour, No call out fee, unlimited call outs, unlimited claims etc. Fast forward to 1 breakdown of a radiator being completely cold. A call was made to the company and an engineer was sent out, but not before a charge of £75.00 as a "Security Payment", according to the telephonist. The said fee was paid, and an engineer sent out to investigate. The fault was with a thermostat. The item was removed, and given to my work colleague. He was told that for it to be replaced, there would be a charge for the replacement part, even though the contract clearly states, NO CHARGES FOR PARTS. The colleague refused to pay for the part on the basis, his contract terms and the yearly fee paid. When he asked for the £75.00 "security payment" to be refunded, it was refused. I was asked if I can help out. My guess is that the company have broken their terms of the contract by charging a £75.00 "security payment" and then refusing to refund it, and also wanting a payment of £24.00 to replace the part. Surely the yearly premium of £183.48 covers what the terms of the contract states. Am I correct?. Also is this not a breach of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, by offering something then changing their mind/moving the goalposts to suit them?. Are there any other laws that apply that I have missed, and is there any governing body that can step in and intervene. Any help that I can give to the work colleague would be greatly appreciated.
  10. After all the investigation was done,the charge of Threatening Behaviour was abandoned, and the charge of Staff Disharmony was created instead. The charge of bringing the company into disrepute still stood, and I was disciplined for those 2 "Offences", to apepar before the Service Delivery Manager yesterday,(friday 27th July). As well a sseveral documents, from solicitors, police forces, and a case study, I went in with the Union top man and presented my case. The charge of bringing the company into disrepute was abandoned, due to what I produced, as well as using an excerpt from Witham V Club 24. The charge of Staff Disharmony i accepted.And walked out with a 6 month warning. So,to all those who thought they knew the law, and wanted to be judge and jury.You failed. It's not who you know, it's what you know.
  11. There are also plenty of cases where an employee has won a case of unfair dismissal at tribunal, and at an appeal by their employer as well.There ar eloads of cases in Selwyns Employment Law Book, which I have at my disposal.
  12. There are no bus companies based at Friar Lane.However,there are 3 companies who use Friar lane.TrentBarton,Yourbus(dunn motor traction), and Marshalls.
  13. Borisbeaver,the issue concerns a colleague/ colleagues, and was aimed at such, not at the employer.Nor was it concerning the employer. And as Bazooka Boo states, "people will always read far too much into it and will always make assumptions".That is exactly what someone has done.Misconstrued it entrely.
  14. So you are saying that warning a colleague that if he/she fails to legally record any defects on the defect card which is a legal document,that you will report them is bullying threatening behaviour??. If I had said,if.....etc etc,I will get someone to kill you, or set your house on fire, or beat you up on a dark night, then yes that is threatening behaviour, but warning someone of the consequences of not filling a defect card out properly is not threatening behaviour.Where is the threat in that?
  15. Borisbeaver,How can this be bringing the company into disrepute when it was my own personal opinion of 2 members of staff?.The company has not been mentioned, nor any of the management, nor any names,(although I did mention 2 cleaners). I have been looking at Witham v Club24,where an employee won her case against dismissal.
×
×
  • Create New...