Jump to content

andrew0101

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    205
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

33 Excellent

About andrew0101

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Barclays have confirmed there are no open claims or any record of anything relating to me at all ... The CMC have now told me that they sent a SAR document in May to which they have had no response nor have they followed it up ..... so I guess I am out of time and they have been negligent
  2. Thank you for your reply.... so I have this clear in my mind even if Barclays did now reply to their SAR they would not be able to follow it up with a claim due to being out of time ... the reason I ask is because I would like to push this firm and possibly try a case for negligence for a bit of sport as they clearly have not acted in my best interests.... as they are solicitors it makes it even more interesting as a test case
  3. A claim, or as the claims company have advised me, a product information request was supposedly submitted to Barclays in May of this year.... .to date I have not had any acknowledgement from Barclays more worryingly when I have rung Barclays PPI helpline who were very helpful, been told they have no record of anything lodged in any format... Should I be concerned that the claims company have not actually submitted anything or is it normal to have no standard letter from the bank?
  4. Now on to the next which is tricky .... I stupidly used a claims company who quite clearly don't know what they are doing as they have told me they have sent my Egg PPI request to HBOS and I will be in a backlog but will hear at some point! How do I deal with this as I am out of time and although the claim was submitted prior to the deadline they have sent it to the wrong lender ... I guess telling them to swing for their fee on the Halifax claim is a good starting point as I know given the outcome on the Halifax one which was near on 10k the Egg one is almo
  5. Cheque arrived Saturday .... banked Monday .... cleared Tuesday morning .... Job done.
  6. But the fact the letter quite clearly states that a cheque will be sent in the next 28 days as of the 4th I assume means a cheque will be sent end of chat as all checks have been completed
  7. Heres an interesting question ... Do the Halifax send out these letters before doing due diligence and making sure there is no money owed to them, this does not apply to me, as surely sending out a letter like that and then doing due dilligence and stopping a payment after that letter must be wrong as well?
  8. Just a question .... If I have a letter from the Halifax saying that they have upheld my PPi claim and I will receive a cheque for the amount they have awarded with 28 days can I assume I have jumped through all the hoops and the cheque will be sent ......
  9. Long story cut short. My wife signed up with nPower on the doorstep back in 2009 whilst I was away on business she was sold on the reduced costs that would not increase for two years... three months later DD doubled... complained got nowhere... didn't pay for nearly five years!!! but was still supplied gas and electricity continued to complain was given loads of ''goodwill gestures'' at £200 a go...and then we moved house and have a new supplier... .naturally we provided moving out meter readings and bills were sent by email. ...nearly £5,000 in total... I as
  10. Just a question. Can nPower hold a customer to account if they are unable to find or supply any signed contract taken at the beginning of the period. This is in relation to an account going back to 2009 where nPower now say they cannot provide me with any signed contract as they have lost / destroyed / wiped it? Wilkins Chapman involved as well
  11. I'm sorry, it's got confusing I was referring to two different posters questions... the money owed by the bank is a different and separate issue and related to a joint charging order... ..the Restons matter was a restriction K which was not paid and has nothing to do with the original post.. ..I was referring to a post where it was suggested that our solicitors should not have paid the restriction K which they didn't, but now Restons have got very heavy... ..hope this makes things clear.
  12. No. Restons have a CCJ and had a restriction K....the restriction has now gone but they have applied through the court for a warrant to seize goods...
  13. It was in joint names... .we did have two restriction K's as well for amounts in single names, they did not get paid.. .although I now have Restons on my case who have issued a warrant for nearly 5k to be paid.... so my worries are not over on that one
  14. Long story short.. .Bank obtained ccj and charging order back in 2010. Did deal with bank who wrote off amount. Sold house a few months back, bank said we still owed a few grand and because of charging order as in joint names we could not complete unless we paid.. .they bent us over a barrel. ...now it's all over and we have moved we want our money back!
×
×
  • Create New...