Dwayne Dibbley
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
91 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Dwayne Dibbley
-
Lloyds secured loan, Claim for possession.
Dwayne Dibbley replied to nunnyrose's topic in Home Repossessions
Property Search - Land Registry as above 3 quid for title register -
Just to close this thread off, on the 13th October 2014 I received a letter from DryFax stating "This account was recently closed with us due to being statute barred." Thanks everyone over the years.
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Do i need to send them the set aside letter? as i have not had any current SD or CCJ letters? So i can just send them the Statute barred one? Thanks
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
OK still no CCA, after resending another Postal Order, receiving a letter from them stating that the account is on hold until they receive the outcome from the client ( that letter was dated 31st March 2014 ) So Today ( 19th May 2014 ) i receive another letter stating that they have not received any payment or contacted them....... Do i just send them a letter refereeing the previous letter regarding the account on hold to some how jog there memories, and that i am still waiting the request I have made how ever long ago now.... Thanks
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi, when we started with the current employer we signed upto a T's and C's Matrix document detailing all our terms etc. We have recently been sent a data validation form to confirm our information is correct on "their system", amongst some mistakes in the document ranging from Surname spelt incorrect and Redundancy terms ect, they reference a different T's and C's document that they have tried to create themselves with has most of our original terms missing, ( the reason they say is that they dont use word any more and have moved to excel . Anyway they have asked us to sign this data validation form with any amendments and return to them. I am happy to make any amendments but i dont want to sign anything untill the resend out a corrected form? so have sent back the form highlighting the mistakes, they have replied stating they cannot make any changes as i haven't signed it . Im i right in what i am doing? as signing it could mean accepting the T's and C's referenced and being worse off? Thanks
-
Well they didn't send it recorded post back to me, so it could be what letter?
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
OK so nearly two months on, i have a letter from unfairfax as follows: We refer to the above matter and previous correspondence between both parties. We return your £1.00 postal order dated 14 November 2013 as you have not completed the payee section and therefor we cannot process your request at this time. We will place this matter on hold for a period of 30 days from the date of this letter in order to provide you with sufficient time to respond to this further. So i guess that although the stated they will contact the client to seek instruction as stated earlier, that they now cant write whatever name they need the postal order made out too themselves, and require my own skilled hand to fill it out for them and send it back again. Any suggestions on a response to there letter. maybe i should print of a sticker and allow them to affix it to the postal order? or should i send them a one pound coin and tell them where to stick it... Thanks for looking
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
OK reply from DryFax today ( dated 29/11/13 ) stating: We acknowledge receipt of your letter dated 15 Nov 13 and we note all your comments. As a result of your letter, we have contacted out client to clarify the current position and seek their further instructions. We will write to you, further, once they have responded. We confirm that, in the meantime, the matter is on hold. We trust this resolves any immediate concerns but, if you do have any further queries, please let me know. Yours...... Does this letter cover as a response for the 12+2 time window for the request? Thanks again
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
CCA delivered and signed for 18/11/13, now to wait 12+2 days....
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
uploaded a pdf containing them all in the above post ( hopefully ) Thanks
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Here attached are the old 2008/2009 files linked in the earlier posts. [ATTACH=CONFIG]47752[/ATTACH]
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I have made no payments to them for years and not sure if i ever had? as the amount due remains the same as the 2007 letter i would assume that i have not made any? ( would a SAR confirm this? ) they have only taken me to court once and lost ( 2009 posts ) Thanks again
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Just been through an old backup of that server that hosted those linked files from the 2007/2008 post and i would say it is the same debt as its the exact same figure £3077.12 in the letters. I have still sent the CCA request off anyhow to them. So going by the date and the figure being the same amount, it should be Statue Barred now?? Thanks
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Possibly but can't tell from their reference number? I can confirm when / if I get the agreement from them. Thanks
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
No i have not asked them for anything, i will send them a CCA request tomorrow. I will update with any replies. Thanks
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Sorry, seems to get shrunk when i uploaded ( to wide i think? ) heres a pdf hopefully better:
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
[ATTACH=CONFIG]47665[/ATTACH] Hi, i have received the attached letter on the 13th Nov, regarding an old Egg account, i am not sure if it yet Statue Bared, so wanted to know if to either ignore it send a Statue Bared letter send a Subject access letter Thanks for you help
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks for all you help guys, SD was set aside
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
OK heres my draft : http://www.x-centric.net/capquest.pdf hope i have got the jist of what you mean? Thanks let us know?
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
what goes in the xxxxxx bit : If the Claimant was not XXXXX then it is not admitted that there was a lawful assignment Thanks EDIT found it i put Egg Banking PLC in place
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
ok if i knock up a word doc and post here with what i have so far so you can cast your eyes over?
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
and a : 18 feb 03 charge for cash advances
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
OK on statements i have 18 dec 2003 Overlimit charge £20 is this the type of charges?
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
but worse case if he does not set it aside a capquest go down the bankruptcy route, i cant see what they will gain i have no assets have no property and am overdrawn in my bank?
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
he'll need to explain why he suddenly stopped paying. only reason was that after posting the egg agreement on here i found it was not enforceable ?
- 129 replies
-
- capquest
- drydensfairfax
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.