johnhill007
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
81 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by johnhill007
-
Hi. She pays £ 10 a year for an annual permit and £ 15 per month, that automatically out of my wifes wages (though currently not charged during covid period). The automatic charge is still in place she just forgot to renew the £ 10/yr permit (unless you look at the badge there is no other reminder - so understandable).
-
Thank you Honey Bee.. 1 Date of the infringement 23.04.21 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Stuck under wiper = 23.04.21 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] Done 3 Date received 23.04.21 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Nothing mentioned/attached 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No - just received on windscreen Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up n/a 7 Who is the parking company? CP Plus Ltd 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Northampton General Hospital - staff car park For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. No just an email address [email protected] or post to CP Plus, PO Box 14836, London, NW3 1WT Windscreen PCN (1).pdf
-
Hello, my wife today (23.04.21) received a PCN from CP Plus. She is an NHS employee working at the hospital for the past 20 years. There is no reminder and the parking badge that she pays for ran out at the end of March and there is no system that reminds her. The PCN is for £ 80 or £ 40 if paid with 14 days. Is there a defence that can be used or just bad luck? Any help appreciated.
-
That's great, thanks very much ericsbrother, really useful.
- 14 replies
-
- neighbours
- subsidence
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Excellent advise, that I shall follow, thanks again. Best regards John
- 14 replies
-
- neighbours
- subsidence
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
That's perfect, thanks. The small tress in my brother-in-laws garden won't get any bigger. However, I have responded with your suggested reply about their much larger conifers in their clients front garden that appear to have caused some damage to their clients own property - putting them on notice. Thanks again.
- 14 replies
-
- neighbours
- subsidence
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks King12345, the neighbours have huge conifers in their front garden that have appeared to have caused some cracking to their own front wall - I think I'll put them on notice of that
- 14 replies
-
- neighbours
- subsidence
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Some trees were there before, some afterwards. They are small, not sure of the type, but they have had no impact on the wall seperating the properties so the claim was really unfounded. - - - Updated - - - Thanks Honeybee
- 14 replies
-
- neighbours
- subsidence
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks for everyones feedback, all relevant and all very helpful
- 14 replies
-
- neighbours
- subsidence
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hello, My brother-in-law received a lengthy report, from assesors acting for insurers, staing that his trees in the back garden had caused subsidence to his neighbour extention. A complete nonsense as the trees are tiny. My brother in law commisioned his own report which stated that the complaint was utter rubbish - mentioning poor quality build of the extension = basically the claim was frivillous and vexatious. The assesors have now written back stating: I have been advised that, as the level of damage occurring to our insured property is slight, and, taking into account the lack of evidence to support the OCA Report recommendations, at this present time your vegetation removal is no longer required. However, you are placed On Notice of future risk. This means that although your vegetation is no longer requested for removal it has been implicated and therefore must be considered as a future risk. Whilst you have advised you will not be mitigating at this present time you may give consideration to taking some action in the future to prevent any further possible damage occurring to our insured property by your vegetation. My file on this matter is now closed and I thank you for your time in dealing. Tree Mitigation Specialist Oriel Services Limited Oakleigh House, 14-16 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3DQ, GB My brother-in-law clearly doesn't want the threat hanging over him, having to mention this to his own future insurers, but is not sure how he should respond to counter this - any ideas please? Perhaps respond that his neighbours are also on notice of their vexatious complaint, or something.. basically put up or shut up. Regards John
- 14 replies
-
- neighbours
- subsidence
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mike, Nothing for ages now a letter from the Court saying: 1. Claim stayed pending appeal of claim to the Supreme Court 2. Claimant shall inform the Court once the Supreme Court's judgement is delivered 3. Any party affected by this order may apply to have it set aside, varied or stayed.. I could be wrong but it sounds like PE have others in the same position as my son.. will keep you posted. PM me if the details (names) are of interest. Thanks again. John
-
Thanks Mike, The other 11 pages were just dross; picture of the car in the car park, copies of their ever increasing invoice, etc nothing that appeared relevant. Not sure why they feel above the law in everyone having to respond to their invoices and demands. Perhaps they can explain this to the Judge if they dare show their face in court.. I'll have my son make an extra search for that Bill of Sale you mentioned. Does my son respond to this or should he simply wait for the Court papers to come through with the date and respond then? Thanks again John
-
Hi, PE have responded to my sons Defence (copy attached). First part relates to the Claim then they seem to have done a copy and paste job as if my son was there and had seen all their pretty sign-age. Doubtless my son will win the day from just being honest, but would appreciate it if you could cast your eye over what these rouges have responded with in case he does need to ask the new owner to come along and state the facts. Thanks again. John
-
Hi Mike. Confirmation from the Court received today that Defence has been filed and passed on to PE. Note to self: 1. Respond in good time 2. Web based responses don't always work on this site - so file manually 3. Contribute £45 to CAG when matter settled this being, in my opinion, the amount a 'reasonable' charge would have been for overstaying the parking limit. Shame about the decision announced in the High Court today about PE, I'm sure this will get sorted out on Appeal. Thanks again, good to have the help of experts. Cheers John
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.