A quick up date Have received an email from their welfare department. They found he wasnt rude to me. Throwing a letter at me addressed to the debtor and telling me to read it to get information off of it wasnt rude? They told me to contact Essex Magistrates Court, Im unaware that this court even exists, Ive done a search. She stated that an external investigation team gave them the details of the debtor. Apparently this was her last known address. Not sure how they come up with this information as I found her on 192.com after she had vacated this property. No information on where he was c

I've had a look at the WS-usual drivel of lies, misdirection etc. using their numbers listed on their WS I will point out what I can see is wrong with their case. The Contract 7] There can be no contract. Under the Airports Act 1986 63 2[d] (d) for regulating vehicular traffic anywhere within the airport, except on roads within the airport to which the road traffic enactments apply, and in particular (with that exception) for imposing speed limits on vehicles within the airport and for restricting or regulating the parking of vehicles or their use for any purpose or in any manner specified in the byelaws;

so they have purchased the debt as long as this other letter is not entitled letter of claim.. oh well no panic no dca is a bailiff and they have zero legal powers whatsoever no matter what the debts type read him this post and get him to send then a CCA request

He has added Legal Costs, which are not chargeable to any debt as he is representing himself in effect.

We all know what your rights are. There is no doubt about it. Enforcing your rights is a completely different matter. If you know Noel Quail sufficiently that he is frightened of you then why do you need to go to court? What is going to happen if you get a judgement which you can't enforce? What action will you take against him then? By the way, let me guess – the MOT station is MA autos Log in to Facebook WWW.FACEBOOK.COM Log in to Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family and people you know.

......... my complaint, the decision by the on this man should be considered as vitiated ......... should read ......... my complaint, the decision by the ombudsman should be considered as vitiated .........

Bit of Goodish news, Just had an email @BankFodder. Have attached it below. Jenny (Packlink eBay) 17 Jun 2021, 12:49 CEST Dear customer, We acknowledge your dispute of the underpayment charge of shipment ......., and we confirm with this e-mail that no charges will be applied to your account. For the future, we strongly suggest to send photographs of the parcel to certify the weight and dimensions of your package (using a ruler to certify the dimensions and a scale for the weight), or any other proof in your possession. Kind regards,

Ok I understand now. Thanks @BankFodder Sorry for the confusion. I will send the letter to Hermes and a Copy to PackLink.

You say that you bought it just under six months ago. You are still in with a chance under the consumer rights act. Send them a letter immediately and tell them that you are invoking your rights under the consumer rights act and that they have a single opportunity to repair the vehicle after which you will reject it. Do that straightaway and then come back here for a fuller reply

Brexit: law and enforcement | Turbulent Times WWW.TURBULENTTIMES.CO.UK If there were three people in this world that I would not choose to carry out a study on regulatory reform, they would be Iain Duncan Smith, Theresa... Another take on it here.

Yes. That's fine. "Vitiated" means legally destroyed/invalidated so that it loses all effect

Hi Andy I am finalising and documenting the final version and will post this up as soon as this has been completed next week, I can confirm that I am preparing 3 Copies of 1) List of documents 2)Witness statements I expect to be in a position to post the final version once approved here to the defendants by 23 June and send to the Court by email on the same date. I am a little confused about what legal costs I can claim, I understand Litigant in person costs are £19 per hour, I have calculated that I have to date spent over 46 Hours on the matter since the claim went into Court, this includes preparing the documents

@BankFodder @BankFodder please see below

You will need to enter the relevant year in place of the XXX

That letter kills his legal costs and also sheds doubt on the veracity of the whole claim in some ways.

Regarding the WS, well Ambreen is at least not as repetitive as Wali, so small mercies and all that. There isn't much substance to it - it boils down to "We put a load of signs up mate". Point 8: "No stopping" is a prohibition, not a contract. Point 22: the IPC, the all-powerful arbiters & creators of the multiverse, have said we're right so we must be right. Use the two WSs I posted links to as the basis for pulling VCS to pieces. In the part about the Unicorn Food Tax add that Simon has also added £50 legal costs yet is representing himself (include as evidence the April letter you upload

It's written that the hearing will be "by video conference (CVP)" so presumably you'll be OK. However, I'm not 100% sure with all these COVID changes being new. Probably best to give the court a ring to be sure. Will your snail mail still get picked up between mid-August and the court date of 29 September?

Hi Rich, Donation received and much appreciated, thanks.

no.3. simple procedure (scotcourts.gov.uk)

Start of another Facebook page – use the name of the company – and prefix it with "the truth about them".. Then start posting stories and also links to this forum particularly to this and the other threads. You need to bring this to a head somehow. Also it should be reported to citizens advice which may eventually (very eventually) trickle through to trading standards. It is clear that there is something very nasty going on here and people are getting ripped off