Why do you think Johnson gives a damn when malnutrition in UK children is doubling https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/food-poverty-hunger-child-malnutrition-hospital-layla-moran-coronavirus-a9615161.html and all I can say is if the kids are malnourished, what the heck state will most of the parents be in? Shameful

DWP have said that sanctions will only be applied as a last resort option, where the claimant is not meeting their claimant commitment requirements and they are not engaging with the Job Centre. It has always been the case, that for the first 3 months of claiming as an unemployed person, they can just apply for jobs which match their skill set. After 3 months they would be expected to widen their job search. So if a person is specialist in one type of employment, after 3 months of not being able to find a job in that particular field, if there are jobs stacking shelves at the local Supermarket, I think they would expect applica

Thanks BF. I've sent them an email as follows; If I haven't heard back from them within a few days I'll follow it up by post, and see where it goes from there.

Good idea, in particular wait in case Ericsbrother comes onto the forum this afternoon.

You still have time to send a snotty letter in reply stating things the Team will suggest shortly, if you ignore it a Claimform will definitely follow, the Smart parking muppets have fewer braincells than a petrol head biker high on patrol vapour.

What stage is your claim at now ? You submitted it in Oct 19 ...has it been allocated yet ? Andy

Thanks - I got this off ABTA website If there are significant changes to the main characteristics of the holiday that mean a significant change to the holiday as whole you are entitled to an offer of an alternative holiday, or a refund of your holiday cost. ABTA cannot determine what is and isn’t a significant change to your particular package holiday, however a general overview of what might be a significant change is below: a change of resort; a change of accommodation to that of a lower category and/or price; a change of flight time or delay of flight of more than 12 hours (in respect of a

You should certainly point it out to them as quickly as possible. Do in writing. However, you will need to assess the cost of the damage – the repair –. I don't know anything about this vehicle – is a new vehicle? Although the damage might be unsightly, is it very important to you to get it repaired? Or would simply a financial compensation satisfy you?

I have the same issue and have had advise such a roll a paper tissue and jam it under the top of the mask where is meets the nose. I've found simply breathing out through the nose reduces fogging completey.

Well it seems slamdunk to me. Not only that but they refer specifically to the original order and that they ask you to sign and "amended order". The only other explanation is maybe they have received it from you. Could that be a possibility? I think I would initially drop them an informal line – by email and by letter saying that despite the amended order which you agree to on XXX date, you now see that the money which has been paid out you has had the full £850 deducted. With a please explain why this has happened and why the terms of the amended order you understood had been agreed had not been. Suggest that you send tha

The Legal Ombudsman has a wider remit than the SRA, and can always refer matters on to the SRA where they find a breach of the SRA's code. I'd suggest writing to the solicitors, highlighting these issues, asking them to refund the money. If they don't then complain to the LO.

I understand that you were involved in a contentious divorce in respect of which there was a bill for court costs – £850. You decided to challenge the costs in court and you lost and an order was made against you. We decided to appeal the order but before the appeal was heard, the solicitors made you a without prejudice offer of a 50-50 split – £425. You agree to this and you signed the document to that effect which you returned to the solicitors. Despite that the solicitors are now trying to impose the original £850 order. Is that the correct order of events? "Without prejudice" is certainly something that doesn

Ha! reading those was fun! I hope the OP reads them as they clearly show that UKPC don't have a leg to stand on presuming their signage is equally poor.

Yes get it exactly correct as you have to show that POPLA were wrong also, finding against you