Fair enough. Didn't want you to get scammed or anything.

My understanding is that you contacted the garage to discuss certain repairs to your vehicle. You asked the garage if they would carry out the repairs and they agreed. Then came the question of getting the vehicle to the garage and the garage said that they would carry that out. I think you have to take this as a whole. I don’t think that you can separate the transport of the vehicle from the rest of the arrangement. I think that if this came before the courts, a judge would look at it in the same way and would not separate the elements of the agreement out. There was clearly an agreement – either express o

I meant to say Impressively Incompetent.

Wow... Just Wow... The Onus is on the Claimant to source that information to back up their Claim Thats just impressive....

so this seems to be going south quite quickly for moriarty then.. first time ive know a claimant to request the defendant to get paperwork they need to substantiate their claim...

Disgusting , there is no Democratic mandate, aside from a small minority of Screeching angry No Dealers, for a hardl Brexit, a right wing coup bankrolled by the above mentioned. They have ruined our country, one day there will be a reckoning for them.

oh well whatever quoting all that that is going to help them im clueless ... but then that's nolans second name anyway

Here is the way this piece of thievery will go. PCS will continue to milk the system in breach of everything - including the Britsih Parking Association's own weak selfserving so-called code of practice. Because they are no longer members of the BPA they are not under the control of the BPA. So what. Actually the BPA controls nothing - other than a fixed-up access to the DVLA database. PCA doesn't need this access at the moment because they merely clamp which means that they don't need keeper details. Once clamping is banned - real-soon-now PCA will come crawling back to the BPA and say - we'll behave ourselves no, please ta