Jump to content


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/05/19 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    As Bazza said the date of knowledge is when limitation starts to run. Johnson v MOD (2012) is the relevant case law. As far as I know it’s still good law.
  2. 1 point
    80+ provable occurrences? I’m surprised they aren’t proceeding under S5 of the Regulation Railways Act 1889, as once or twice MIGHT just have been without intent, but claiming 80+“accidents” would be beyond reasonable. What are you (realistically!) looking for as an outcome?
  3. 1 point
    Its all meaningless until they can provide and comply with your section 79 request.
  4. 1 point
    Threads merged....should be okay to post here now. Andy
  5. 1 point
    The information is here on CAG Please be wary of users trying to direct you to other sites that want fees for helping out of you
  6. 1 point
    Already answered this in my last post......
  7. 1 point
    yes you did the Q&A but not the last bit of my post... so now you cant ring northants bulk till monday now they will send it straight away
  8. 1 point
    Definitely worth a go, they might chuck in the towel before Court.
  9. 1 point
    no it wont cost you anymore please don't use papers only you will lose if you do that. yes you have every chance of winning. and it might never need attendance.
  • Create New...