Money tap turned off by firm’s misleading car-park signs [15 Sept 2012] Get ready to congratulate parking company boss Mike Perkins for being elected to the British Parking Association (BPA) ‘approved operator scheme’ board, which supervises the activities of private parking companies and awards ‘sanction points’ against companies in what the BPA claims is its strict disciplinary regime. Perkins is the operations and strategy manager of Combined Parking Solutions – always good to have industry people policing industry people. So it’s time to have a look at his company's website, where the illiterate and badly punctuated

You did commit a Criminal Offence, you were just given a Penalty Fare which is a civil remedy for said offence. They could have reported you for consideration of prosecution. Bear in mind that just because you provide evidence of your railcard doesn't mean you're home free....What if you lent it to a mate on the date in question? The TOC doesn't know you from Adam afterall. Also, your 21-days is ticking by each day, so bear in mind the amount will rise and eventually be cancelled as fistclass has said.

If you know his address, send by registered post a letter telling that if he does not return your deposit in 14 days you will take him to court for non-protection/notification of your deposit, and under the new localism act he may be liable to compensate you for an addiotional amount of up to three times that. As the contract was verbal, the default postion will be as thoughan AST standard contract existed with all it s rights and terms.

The Actuarial Account is the one that Swift and the other seedy lenders don't want you to see. It is the one where they add all the additional fees and charges and charge interest on them which over the period of the loan can add up to many times the amount that you borrowed. Their hope is that you will never be able to pay off the loan so somewhere along the line they can get possession of the property. Basically they run two accounts for a borrower, the loan account, which has the initial borrowing and the broker's fee (which is normally well above the limits recommended by the FSA) and to which the interest is added and payments made.

Did Eqita compile these results or was it BCC Not surprised at what the table states . Leakie

Have a read of the conversation again. It is very obvious that they are lying in order to get you to pay them over the phone.

Ok. you are on benefits and are classed as vunerable. You need to contact your council who issued the order, and tell them your circumstances. They should then call off the bailiffs, and you can deal direct with the council. If the bailiff discussed things with your neighbor, you must make a complaint as they are breaching the data protection act.

Yep, don't let yourself get sidetracked......... stick with the evidence in front of you and question anything that doesn't appear either justifiable or an accurate statement of fact. Absent any agreed values or contract, would a reasonable person [or the court] believe that the consideration value of their service in brokering a life policy was circa 2.5k?

I agree totally HB! You are not fighting ATOS you a trying to score points/qualify under rules in an inflexible system run by the DWP on behalf of the Secretary of State for Social Security. Like it or not that's the be all and end all! Fail to address the above and getting fixated on ATOS is akin to shooting the delivery boy. Whilst it will make you feel better it will not prove anything or win you ESA. Cold hard crispy facts people in a way the intelligent folks on the tribunal panel can understand; Now repeat after me :- I deserve to be awarded ESA because I meet descriptor/rule:- 1, give a couple of example

Hello there. There's also a link to the descriptors in the appeals sticky, if it helps. Fwiw, I personally wouldn't use emotive words like 'lied' because it may not help your cause. I find 'mislead[ing] is useful. My best, HB

Yes and yes. You would need to explain in detail how the criteria is met. For example "I am unable to mobilise 50 meters due to arthritis in my shoulders and hands. Using aids such as a wheelchair are painful. The last time I tried to mobilise, I spent the rest of the day in pain and unable to do anything". or something like that anyway - explain why the criteria is met and what happened the last time this person tried to do the activity.