I'm not laughing. Neither are decent and very hard working Caggers such as, say, Monty2007. This has absolutely nothing to do with legal debate, and everything to do with conduct, attitude and behaviour across many Threads and Postings. The finger of suspicion pointed at Rhodium78 because of the strange way their Posting style changed from being a damsel in distress, to a snarling and apparently male attack lawyer, i.e. this: To this: And this... And this... I am adamant that it is possible to help people without taking the piddle out of them, or ridiculing the efforts and experiences of others trying

ok, what you need to do is get a letter off to scott and co first thing on Monday stating the overpayment was and is being deducted via benefits and to hold action on the account until this is sorted and clarified by the HB team. alos on Monday call your local CT and HB office and get them to clarify the status and ask them to contact scott and co to withdraw, follow this up with a letter to them as well if you can try and send recorded delivery to both.

Have changed the thread title

Here's a few on-line benefits calculators. HB and LHA rates vary by regions known as "Broad Market Rental Areas" (BMRAs), therefore it is important that you also check on your own council's web-site's benefit calculator. See "Check your eligibility for housing benefit" below. Directgov: Check your eligibility for housing benefit DWP and HMRC benefits and credits: Benefits adviser service : Directgov - Do it online Alternative "benefits search" c/o "Turn to us": Benefits Search The LHA-Direct website has been developed to enable tenants renting accommodation from a private landlord to calculate the possible amou

You rang? Wow. That's a spectacularly pathetic response! Doesn't make one iota of difference how long they waited to set the dogs on you. They committed repudiatory breach of agreement at the point they sent that Termination Notice. You have accepted their repudiation, thus the agreement has been rescinded, relieving both parties of further obligation under the agreement, except for arrears due at the time which can be counterclaimed as damages for the breach. Let's get some other comments then we'll draft you a letter.

Hi Landy, I don't know on who's face they thought it looked properly executed. It contains none of the prescribed terms. You need the reverse scan. You also need the T&C's from the time the agreement was taken out and every subsequent change of terms. You may want to write to the new debt owners, detailing that MBNA have unlawfully rescinded the agreement and that they should have checked before taking it on. The DN is clearly faulty. Dated the third, by second class post, service would be the 9th, therefore rectification date would indeed be the 23rd. They say you must rectify before that date, so 20th. They are 3 days sho

Martin, I cannot for confidentiality reasons disclose how I know that rhodium78 is the "genuine article". The simple fact is that he has been "outed" by 4 particular posters as being a troll simply because of his posts on faulty DN's and not because of any evidence to support the assertion. That alone is enough to remove posts which are off topic. I'll take the risk of being called a troll too then... rhodium78 assertions are correct regarding DN's. Now, what do the posters in this thread think of that? Dare anyone call me a troll too?

I've been alerted to this thread, mainly because the OP clearly needs assistance, but also because of this witch-hunt. We all need to understand that there are opposing viewpoints and that a counter argument is not personal and not designed to shake one's faith in their case. In fact if someone like rhodium78 has gone out of his way to point out a valid flaw in the reasoning of a person proceeding with a case as a LIP then surely it is better for it to be brought out into the open here rather than be stuffed in the courtroom? I won't judge the manner of the comments because I understand feelings and tempers can run high in the heat

Hi Fluffystuff I'm in a similar position to you in that I will be hoping to speak for my OH even though I've not named myself as a witness on the AQ. I've just posted the following on another post, but you may find the threads useful, particularly the second one (same goes about teaching you to suck eggs regarding the first link! ). Cheers Rob

Hi geocar like yourself, I take the same tablets, all the time i have taking them, I have never had problem with Boots suppling plavix 75mg. If Boots do not stock any medication that i need, they have always been able to obtain the named medication on my prescription from somewhere (might take 24hrs to do so). It could be that I have been using Boots in Waterloo L22 for blimey more years that i care to remember (lol) for my presciptions. Ask your wife to insist (with a heavy hand) plavix 75mg is given. or ask your wife to tell the pharmacist the differrent make of clopidogrel is causing bowel movment

if 1/ and 2/ are confirmed in correspondence- then i would just refer to the letters in the WS and give them exhibit numbers eg DD/1 DD/2 and then leave the actual exposure of the relevance of their content to your legal arguments in court so that you deny them the opportunity to pre prepare an argument- they often miss the obvious in their haste

The way forward with this is to apply for Set Aside on Form N244 on the HMCS website. Your reasons for doing so are that you never received any prior notification of any Court proceedings, therefore you were unable to mount a defence/counterclaim/make offer of payment. If you still owe Sherforce some cash you should also apply on the same form for a Stay of Execution pending your set aside application - this then halts any further enforcement action and charges. There is a fee to pay for this application - think it is still £75. If you win your set aside - and don't forget you have already paid the CCJ even though it was via the HCEO - t