so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx

There is a huge difference between Roadchef who presumably have some morals and are concerned about road safety ... ... and Group Nexus who are only interested in £££££. So, yes, appealing and mentioning illness to Group Nexus won't wash because the PPCs are simply bloodsuckers. But the organ grinder/Roadchef could well be a different story. Emphasise the medical emergency, that the person would have been committing the offence of dangerous driving had they left in the condition they were in, etc. We say not to out the driver but I think you have to tell Roadchef that the driver was incapacitated and who that was. T

Hi All Just an update that the case was heard today and thankfully the case was dismissed. As many had told me, DCB legal sent an advocate who like myself was also there 30 mins beforehand. He wanted to double check a few things with me beforehand that I had put in my witness statement and then told me that he agrees that my lease forms the supremacy of contract and that he will let the judge also know this once we enter. He stuck to his word and led with this and the judge asked if I had anything to add and I just reiterated the supremacy of contract points from my witness statement. The judge then dismissed the case and the whole

Topic Title Updated.

Good luck today, TD. Please let us know how it goes. HB

all done to spook people into thinking a debt is going up some kind of imaginary chain. of course as you know the bottom line is no DCA has any more power than the previous one nor their client DCA. they are ALL totally legally POWERLESS. dx

Well I'm afraid that you will have to give us details. Best will in the world, you haven't explained anything or given this nothing to go on

Cormack v Revenue & Customs (PROCEDURE : application to strike out), [2021] UKFTT 355 (TC) | First-tier Tribunal (Tax), Judgment, Law, casemine.com WWW.CASEMINE.COM Get free access to the complete judgment in Cormack v Revenue & Customs (PROCEDURE : application to... Judge rules that assessments were invalid due to fraud.

If you do get a letter of Claim and or Pre Action Protocol pack 15. Where there has been non-compliance with a pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction, the court may order that (a) the parties are relieved of the obligation to comply or further comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (b) the proceedings are stayed while particular steps are taken to comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (c) sanctions are to be applied. 16. The court will consider the effect of any non-compliance when deciding whether to impose any sanctions which may include— (a) an order t

A victory is a victory Bertie. Well done!

Good evening guys many thanks for your posts and advice. Im sorry for the late reply but i fell asleep on the sofa when i got home. The good and bad news is that the case has been discontinued, the bad news is the claimant did not inform me of this. I wasted fuel and paid for 2 hrs of parking to find this out. Not that it matters now but the lady in reception told me that the county court was in Gloucester today and not Cheltenham however my letter clearly says Cheltenham. So i'm assuming the county court moves between the 2 courts. I was actually looking forward to getting a judgement in my favour but it was not to be. The w

After speaking to a probate solicitor it looks like we might have a problem. It seems that the Solicitor that processed the will might not have looked at the deeds of the house and registered mine and my brothers interest in the trust. After my dad passed his wife has informed the LR and has just her name on there now and not our interest meaning we have no say over the house as it stands. I am awaiting a meeting with the original solicitor to see what has happened and how they can sort this out.

TfL prosecutor will not carry a card terminal no. cash is better..however often give a number to ring to do so.

CORPORATE DEBT RECOVERY LIMITED overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK CORPORATE DEBT RECOVERY LIMITED - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history... CORPORATE DEBT RECOVERY LIMITED people - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK CORPORATE DEBT RECOVERY LIMITED - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history...

Go for it Bertie! Don't worry too much about how you dress. Just remember the arguments we made in your WS.

ive already CAREFULLY explained how it all works earlier. what you will have to pay is already preset and detailed on the court forms/TfL stuff you already have. you wont be asked any questions upon your financial means etc. thats not under debate . you wont be asked upon any mitigating circumstances, you have pleaded guity which you always SHOULD. the ONLY 2 reasons you are attending is to: 1) after finding the TfL prosecutor... plead directly face to face before you go in to try and get an OOC (you can bring up or say anything/everything you like ...anything that might get them to agree) 2) if 1 fails...show y

FOR IF AND ONLY IT GETS TO A COURT CLAIM I've actually watched two small claims for basically an indentical situation (part of my familiarisation visit months ago). You need to have an expert or independent jewllers report that states that the fault is with the ring manufacutiring and not becuase you damaged it. Otherwise if they raise the argument that it was damaged after use, if theres no report from either of you then going off what I saw from 2 seperate district judges both were told to go away and get it and come back. Make sure you have one is the one thing I'd say otherwise I assume you'd get teh same

Will do x

And in other news, I've been in contact with the original buyer of the golf clubs in Cardiff, who received the empty box a month after I despatched it. Unfortunately he has disposed of the box, but before he did so he took a couple of photos showing the cut/torn end through which the clubs were obviously removed. I wrapped the package, especially both ends, with yards of strong, black duct tape, there is no way it would have split..... 22Apr24 - photos of cut or torn box.pdf

As I had been reading about planning permission in other threads I thought I would query PP at Riverside. After searching online regarding planning permission for the retail park and finding nothing, I spoke to the planning department on the phone and they said they couldn't find anything but that's because of the length of time the retail park has been there which is well over ten years. Therefore, even if the PPC had not applied for PP at the time, the cameras, (didn't ask about signs) have been there for longer than ten years so would have deemed consent and the council would not take any action against them if a complaint was ma

Update Got the paperwork request from IPS in the post - now just need to send back certified copies of everything All flight, hotel and holiday bookings have been cancelled and monies refunded --> excluding BA BA only refunded the taxes/fees but not the flight costs - purchased as non-refundable booking Even after sending them the death certificate they would not budge!! Will let you know how I manage with IPS - looks fairly straight forward G

Get in touch with the credit card company as they're equally liable under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act. Let them know that you wish to make a claim for a full refund under Section 75 bla bla bla. Explain the response you've had from the retailer and provide the independent report you've had in their claim. Be best to do this before doing any court action (it also gives you time to read up on the court processes) because if you were to make a claim you would claim against both the retailer and the credit card company.

actually looking at this a third time. i'd not put in an N245. let it run see if anything happens advise us if it does. do not speak or make contact with anyone esp by phone or email without checking here. go radio silent totally dx

Liz Truss says Tories are part of a Blairite attempt to silence her. Reform UK leader Richard Tice said the Conservative Party is 'socialist' and suggested Rishi Sunak is not a 'real conservative'. .. says the definitely NOT real Conservatives Lets also hope that Starmer implements a clause where bringing the UK into disrepute, or breaching the requirements of ex UK PMs results in the permanent withdrawal of ALL UK taxpayer funding of them

If her name appears on Google, she must apply to Google to have it removed. Nobody else can do it, only her. Known as the right to be forgotten. BTW, it's unlikely she'll get them to do it.

In response to your post 52, the new Government Private parking Bill has been withdrawn for the moment and will not take effect until it comes into force. It cannot come soon enough but in the meantime the rogues are trying to rip as many motorists off as possible before the changes come into force. Yes their interpretation of the Grace period is ludicrous it defies logic and the Law until it comes into force. But that's what you get when the lunatics run the asylum.

they are not. PA...just type no need to keep hitting quote

Hi Folks, Been 162 days! Just by way of update. Today I received a text from Opos Ltd so no doubt Capquest are renting the debt out to anybody who fancies a nibble. Safe to say I will not be responding.

Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 2024-04-08 GroupNexus PCN event 2024-03-28.pdf

Is this place near to you? I ask for two reasons. If you can easily go back, then get photos of the signs. On GM and Parkopedia there are various comments about the signs being pants. Also go back to the school uniform shop and ask the manager there for contact details for the retail park (which I've Googled & Googled and got nowhere). The school uniform shop will just be tenants of the retail park, they won't be able to do anything. It will be the retail park that called EPC in, and we've seen loads of cases where the organ grinder has intervened and called off the monkey. As for EPC, aye, ignore them until LoC st

mainly for future readers..BUT.. nope not true, .... they could have used a trace agency to find your address, never assume a V5C is correct if you find paperwork that should have arrived at the RK's address has not always CHECK. esp if you've moved in recent times or since the date of the parking event. dx

A second charge holder isn't going to do that at this stage. "Lender" would get first dibs on the proceeds of sale probably leaving nothing for "Entity".

Other entity? Does another creditor have security on the property?

In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears). This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs.

Just had a look myself. That's not a letter of claim but I imagine you'll get one soon. When you do, come back here

Topic title updated. Andy

You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you sa

I'm really lost as to why they say it was at gloucester. Your notice of hearing is clear that its at cheltnam. Yes the claimant should have informed you, but its likely DCB legal may have sent a letter you never got - it did seem a bit weird that you didn't get their WS EDIT - I've checked courtserve and your hearing isnt listed on there, so as much as it won't help you, this might be a good guide for users to check the day before their hearings

ignore dx

Awful people. I hope the same thing happens to all the CEOs and other directors who let innocent people be prosecuted.

Still no response from neither Shiply or from the courier. The reviews on Trust pilot are seemingly getting more and more negative and despite their saying that AirSpeeder have been suspended from the platform, Airspeeder are in fact active on there on a daily basis. I have emailed again today and shall see if I get a response as I am also now about to send emails to various media sources and such - even if I don't get my items ( which I think it's blatantly obvious that they aren't arriving ), I intend to make as much noise and stink about this as possible xx

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406231-the-pre-action-protocol-for-debt-claims-is-made-by-the-master-of-the-rolls-as-head-of-civil-justice-1st-oct-2017/#comment-5145126

MCOL will tell you once they've filed it with the courts so just check there. I'm sure the courts are massive fans of DCBL using official documents to harass and scare people (Not! ) Remember that the courts call the shots now, not the claimant.

Yes

Will let you know if a letter of claim ever materialises but it does appear that they don't seem to go down the court route. Since this happened last June I would have expected to have heard something by now. Good luck to you

I am sorry to disagree with you Dave but UKPC are stupid enough to lose their own cases.

RE Illegal Signage and the CST letter. a] neither they nor Met have said they don't need planning permission b] neither they nor Met have admitted they do have pp c] regardless [or irregardless as my son annoying says] of the lack of pp and where the responsibility in obtaining it , until the pp is in place, the signs should not have been erected. So they signs are there illegally, not unlawfully, so therefore a criminal offence. Although the Government Private Parking Code of Practice is not in force as yet the Government did ask the private parking community to bring into use as much of the Act as possible prior to it go

yes says site owner and latterly landlord. which is wrong on both front as the parking company must have planning permission granted by the relevant council not piggy back on the back of any previous permission granted to the landowner. i think you may be able to help lots of people here. write back and ask could they provide the contact details of the land owner and the landlord their clients parking contract is signed with.

eh? what are you so confused about? you print off 3 copies of your completed n180 (using the pdf file in the link) one for you file one to the court with everything on it. before you print the THIRD copy for DCBL.. REMOVE your signature, your email address and your phone number...hit print whats confusing about that? and dont forget to get free proof of posting from po counter for each. 2nd class stamp is quite ok dx

Their PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Therefore PE cannot transfer the alleged debt from the driver to the Keeper. You have done well not to appeal so PE does not know who was driving and as anyone who has an insurance policy is able to drive your car. I know the poor dears think their PCN is compliant but it is not and one of these days they will find out- but that is for the future. The reason for the non compliance is that instead of providing the period of parking they provide the arrival and departure of the car. Big difference especially with three children on or two perhaps needin