Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Laptop problems from Very - now ive issue court claim - help please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1906 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I ordered a Lenovo laptop from Very in November 2016 for a birthday present in December.

It was around £375.

I tested it before we gave it to our daughter on December 21st and it was fine.

She used it to browse the Internet, watch YouTube and play games. And occasionally used photoshop.

 

Around May 2017 I did a scan using the lenovo help centre application that came with the laptop and there was a couple of hard drive errors.

I contacted very and they said to contact Lenovo which I did.

They said it was hard drive failure and we arranged for it to be picked up and taken to to Germany to be repaired.

It took a little over a week to come back. They replaced the hard drive.

 

I switched it on and there was strange display issues.

The screen was glitchy and it was unusable.

I contacted lenovo again and he told me to try a few things which didn't work so he arranged for it to be picked up again and taken to Germany for a second time. When it returned to us they had replaced the motherboard and the processor.

 

This was around June 2017 and its been working okay until this week when it won't even turn on.

I've just about had enough with very and lenovo.

I know the warranty is up but surely after replacing three core parts of the laptop I shouldn't be having yet more issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lenovo Services and Warranty | Lenovo UK

https://www3.lenovo.com/gb/en/services-warranty/

STEADFAST RELIABILITY. Lenovo systems undergo stress tests to meet rigorous reliability standards. Many of our laptops pass 8 military tests for extreme condition with dust and vibration, heat, cold, altitude, water, and humidity. SEE THE OTHER REASONS ...

 

 

does it?

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

CRA is against the retailer

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your rights are exactly against Very as they are suppliers. Don't expect them to be helpful. In fact I think I read just yesterday that either they or their parent company are in trouble and are laying off about 2000 employees.

 

If I were you I would move quickly on this. Write a letter to very and tell them that you hold them responsible and that you want it repaired or replaced. Point out to them that it is their responsibility under the Consumer Rights Act.

 

I doubt whether they will be very cooperative and I would plan threatening and beginning a legal action pretty quickly. It's not worth mucking around with these people. Although you seem to have had a very fast turnaround last time, if very send off repair this time I would be at all surprised if it is several long weeks. I would say that it would be reasonable to expect it to be repaired and returned to you within three weeks.

 

Read our customer services guide and implement the advice there if you are thinking of doing anything on the telephone. We get lots of stories about Very here. They're certainly not the kind of company that I wouldn't do business with

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Received this email from very.

 

 

 

We are sorry to hear about the current state of the item.

 

We have looked into your account, and we regret to inform you that the item is outside from both the Home Approval Guarantee period and the Supplier's 12 Month Warranty period.

 

A way forward is to obtain an Independent Report from an Engineer to inspect the item for manufacturing faults, and forward the report to us.

 

Please be advised, the report must display the following details:

 

Contact details of independent Engineer

Clear letterhead showing on the top of the report

The description of the manufacturing fault found

The cost of the repairs

 

Upon receiving the required information, we will further offer our guidance and advisement, for a proper resolution.

 

We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Vuyo Nyati

 

Very customer services team

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea why you have allowed this to go on for so long. It's over a month hence we advised you to contact them and to lay down on the line. Now you have received a perfectly predictable reply from Very who are a niggardly capital company that frequently attempts to deny their customers their customer rights. I can think of parallels with Currys/PC World.

 

They are playing you like a fish.

 

There are three ways you can deal with this.

You can either let it go and put it down to experience.

Or you can do what they say, find yourself an independent engineer, pay £100 or so for a report, send it off to Very and then wait for another month or so for their reply which may or may not agree to give you what you want – but probably not.

Or you can take control of the matter – take a risk on the claim fee, and write to them and given 14 days or you will begin a legal action – then bring it. Don't bluff and don't muck around. In this case, they would probably say they want a report – if it goes to court, then easily take the laptop to court, explain to the judge what has happened and switch on in front of him. When it doesn't switch on you simply invite them to draw his own conclusions as to whether or not this is satisfactory quality and for a reasonable period of time. You have an 85% chance of success. The chances that Very will bottle it and pay you out rather than go to court are probably about 70%.

 

So there is a slim chance of losing and if you do lose then you will lose your claim fee – about 50 quid and also a hearing fee – which might be 100 quid or so. Somebody else can put me right on this – or you can go look it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, I don't think we asked you how you paid for this. Was it with a credit card?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or how do pay your very account

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, I don't think we asked you how you paid for this. Was it with a credit card?

 

It was with a debit card.

 

I had previously sent 3 letters which they ignored. I have 2 phone calls which I have recorded and I am sending a letter before court action this morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Or run it till the last minute and see if you blink first

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I posted previously about taking Very (The catalogue) to court as they sold us a laptop that was confirmed by Lenovo to have a manufacturing defect.

 

The court date is January 29th 2019 and as the Very account is in my partners name I will be acting as her lay representitive in court as she suffers with anxiety and couldn't cope.

 

Very's solicitor have submitted their defence. I have never been to court before let alone spoken in court so any advice would be really helpful.

 

A brief overview of the case: Very sold us a laptop November 2016, mid May 2017 there was hard drive issues, sent to Lenovo head office where they replaced the hard drive. When it was returned I switched it on and there was graphic display issues, contacted Lenovo again and they said to send it to them again which I did. When it came back they replaced the processor and the motherboard. It stopped working again around June 2017.

 

I have emails from Lenovo saying there was a manufacturing defect which I will provide in court.

 

What are my next steps? Is there a court statement template I can use or can I just type something up myself? Also as I am going to be a lay representitive as stated above, do I need to do anything regarding this before the court date?

 

Sorry for rambling but my daughter has been without a laptop for so long and is now in secnodary school and could really do with one.

 

Happy to answer any questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

please keep to one thread.

 

bankfodder will help you with you court claim.

 

post up their defence and the POC of your claim to ONE multipage PDF please

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

please keep to one thread.

 

bankfodder will help you with you court claim.

 

post up their defence and the POC of your claim to ONE multipage PDF please

read upload

 

Yes please. Don't hang around. You should have involved us with this more closely and earlier.

 

You could have made a familiarisation visit. You still could but it may be a bit late

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...