Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit solutions Phone calls -Advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5456 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My late mother's 2nd husband rang me tonight, he's been getting telephone calls from CRS 01422431020 leaving him messages for me to get in contact with them for a month now.

I have never lived at his address. I have no idea how they got his telephone number. He has suffered from severe depression since my mother died 5 years ago and I am furious at whoever has started harassing him :-x

 

The only clue I have is a reference number they gave him WESCNW which makes me think this has been instigated by Wescot Credit (the original DCA that were chasing me for the money Paypal lost http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-consumer-issues/189247-nco-paypal.html

and NCO/ P Brown are now trying to get from me.

 

Any advice (apart from paying out money for goods I never received!!)

<a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/" alt="Support ORG" target='_blank'><img src="http://widgets.openrightsgroup.org/founding1000/i-founded/838215.png" alt="Support the Open Rights Group" border="0"></a>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit Resource Solutions 08707355333 01422431020

 

CREDIT RESOURCE SOLUTIONS LIMITED

46 PRESCOTT STREET

HALIFAX

WEST YORKSHIRE

HX1 2QW

Company No. 04690879

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit Resource Solutions 08707355333 01422431020

 

CREDIT RESOURCE SOLUTIONS LIMITED

46 PRESCOTT STREET

HALIFAX

WEST YORKSHIRE

HX1 2QW

Company No. 04690879

 

Thank you, is there an example letter that I should write or should I just let rip? :-x

<a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/" alt="Support ORG" target='_blank'><img src="http://widgets.openrightsgroup.org/founding1000/i-founded/838215.png" alt="Support the Open Rights Group" border="0"></a>

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll get more help in the debt collector's forum (I have flagged a moderator to have your thread moved), but the following should have the desired response:

 

- HARASSMENT WARNING -

WARNING; PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997;

WARNING; COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003. s127.

 

Telephone Number: {Your Telephone Number}

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

Dear Sir/Madam.

 

I am writing in relation to telephone calls that I have received from your organisation, which I deem to be personally harassing. I have verbally requested that these calls stop, but I am still receiving call. I now require the telephone number listed above to be completely removed from your systems.

 

I am in the view that your continued telephone calls put you in breach of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

 

This is a private telephone line, operated on a contract with the intention of receiving and making personal phone calls, I have not authorised any other member of my family to receive calls from your organisation using this PRIVATE TELEPHONE LINE.

 

By using this telephone number without my permission you are interferring with my ability to use my own private property for the duration of any call.

 

It is my right to require that this telephone line, which is licenced solely to myself, is kept clear for my own personal calls.

 

It is consquently my view that you are commiting the tort of interference with contract insofar as for the duration of each call you make to me without my permission, you are interfering with my contractual right to receive and make personal calls on my private telephone line.

 

Continued interference with my contractual rights in this manner may result in legal action.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to the Office of Communications, Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you may be liable for a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that all telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Carpe Jugulum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved.This is quite disturbing and you shouldnt put up with it.I will retitle your thread also.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much money are you talking about?

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for moving this to the appropriate forum :)

 

Depending on if it's paypal (£440) or NCO (£624) - I have no idea how much CRS will demand!

<a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/" alt="Support ORG" target='_blank'><img src="http://widgets.openrightsgroup.org/founding1000/i-founded/838215.png" alt="Support the Open Rights Group" border="0"></a>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your late mothers 2nd husband can do without the hassle, Credit Resource Solutions Ltd, are listed as call centre activities, I would be tempted to give them a call in this instance. Try not to give them too much information, but I think you need to find out who is chasing you.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a 'prove it' letter ..

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

After that , perhaps a statute barred letter . I believe a statute barred letter should always be sent in the unlikely event that they can prove the debt is yours . It isn't really a case of wether it really is or not statute barred , but wether they can prove it isn't . If they pass the prove it and SB letter test .. then it is onto the usual cca request etc . Do not send them ( SB /prove it) out at the same time , it is all about procrastinations and finding out what they know (before you commit yourself to fighting them , or to see if they are worth fighting ) .. and drawing them into making mistakes you can make complaints about at a later stage . A constant barrage of complaints is a good terror tactic to use on unsuspecting rearguard office staff , they want you to deal with their telephone monkeys . Instead you are plaguing them , and they don't like it .

Edited by Percival Wigglesbottom
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a phenomenally BAD idea to phone ANY dca unless you are extremely confident on the phone.

 

It is VERY easy to be bullied, brow-beaten, intimidated or LIED to.

 

If you are not 100% in control all the way throught the conversation, it can leave you feeling rotten for hours, and I, personally, don't recommend it.

  • Haha 1

Carpe Jugulum

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a phenomenally BAD idea to phone ANY dca unless you are extremely confident on the phone.

 

It is VERY easy to be bullied, brow-beaten, intimidated or LIED to.

 

If you are not 100% in control all the way throught the conversation, it can leave you feeling rotten for hours, and I, personally, don't recommend it.

 

Sorry, it is not a phenomenally BAD idea in this instance. The OP's elderly relative is being harassed by a call centre on a fishing trip.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think bigeggs point was that there are better ways to do it-and keeping things in writing is the best way.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think bigeggs point was that there are better ways to do it-and keeping things in writing is the best way.

 

I agree, but using what home address? He could use his step fathers, but that would invite problems for his stepfather, or he could use his own, that would give them the information that they seek. I believe he needs to find out who is chasing first.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I see your point.

They are breaching OFT guidelines if they fail to make it known what the debt is for and the nature of their interests.....and also of course who they are.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And yet they are breaching Data Protection if they do... (To the step-father, that is).

 

I, personally, would treat these calls the same as any other "nuisance" call - report to BT & police -

Don't get involved in any sort of dialogue unless they get your correct address. (but don't give them it!)

Carpe Jugulum

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, I have to thank all of you for the advice - it's fantatic that someone can come here and get this much help!

 

And yet they are breaching Data Protection if they do... (To the step-father, that is).

 

I, personally, would treat these calls the same as any other "nuisance" call - report to BT & police -

Don't get involved in any sort of dialogue unless they get your correct address. (but don't give them it!)

 

 

I would like to follow this initially, how do I start this course of action? Is there a procedure?

<a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/" alt="Support ORG" target='_blank'><img src="http://widgets.openrightsgroup.org/founding1000/i-founded/838215.png" alt="Support the Open Rights Group" border="0"></a>

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
First off, I have to thank all of you for the advice - it's fantatic that someone can come here and get this much help!

 

 

 

 

I would like to follow this initially, how do I start this course of action? Is there a procedure?

 

Sorry for delay in response, life has got away from me recently...

Give BT a ring on 150 from a BT landline, tell them you're getting nuisance calls.

Then phone your local plod (there's an 0845 number for "non-emergency" problems) and tell them the same.

 

Someone on here (cheekiness towards DCA thread, I think) recommends answering the phone with:

 

"Good Morning, BT telephone harassment investigation department, please give me your full name, which company you work for, and your company address".

 

They usually hang up after the word"department" and you never hear from them again (allegedly).

Carpe Jugulum

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...