Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/Overdale 5xPAPLOC Now claimform - old Cap1Card debt.


Bazooka Boo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes Andy, drop that payment right down to £1 a month now.

Did you have an agreement with Cr@p1 or did you just start paying them a fiver a month?

Once I defaulted, I ignored the phone calls etc. but wrote to them explaining my financial situation in a letter and made the offer of £5/ month standing order as a 'goodwill' gesture suggested by dx on here which I set up couple of months ago mate. I also stated I wouldn't take phone calls etc. and would only correspond in writing on the matter but they seemed to ignore me on that point. I've not received any sort of income/ outgoings form and to be honest, I feel that's none of their business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to send an income and expenditure form although I would send them a copy of your JSA award (minus your NI number and amounts if you are getting extra for family members)

Tell them again no phone calls etc and sorry but its £1 per month.

 

Should they decide to take you to court it will take them 5 years just to get back court fees!

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your right, it is none of their business.

Send them nothing, drop the payments to £1 a month, as you GOGW has obviously been ignored too.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

So just received a call from Freds :censored:

 

Seems I needed to fine-tune my truecall settings, they slipped through my defences! :-x

 

What annoyed me most was the automated computer voice welcoming me to 'fredrickson' then being put through to a young girl who read from her script, like a good little girl and how she has been taught.

 

'Can I speak to Mr ....?

WHO'S THIS?

'It's Fredrickson Intl and I need to talk to Mr..... about a business matter'

I DON'T HAVE ANY BUSINESS MATTERS WITH YOU, REMOVE THIS NUMBER FROM YOUR FILES AND DON'T RING AGAIN ..........click'

 

Now to start the complaints process with the FCA, they started off calling themselves FPC, I knew who it was, then changed to Freds,

FPC is a trading style of freds intl registered office is the 'Leeds losers' apex view.

 

Freds intl is part of the lowlife group registered office at Ellington House? still Leeds, can only guess that the use of different addresses is an attempt to exploit debtors lack of knowledge?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

YAY!! YAY!! :whoo::cheer2::rockon:

 

I finally have a missive of my favourite tame solicitor Mr Bryan Bloody Carter!

 

It's his usual first threat letter telling me I 'must' contact Freds within 14 days blah blah blah. In my book MUST is synonymous with 'may' so I will not be contacting anyone, less for a bit of baiting.

 

The normal box with fees that they will add should they take it to court 'yawn yawn'

 

And that "This is a serious matter & you may wish to seek legal advice"Yeah thanks for that stirling piece of advice bryan, you would do well to take some legal advice of your own, this is one cage you didn't want to rattle old boy.

 

So rang him up, spoke to a pleasant enough lady, who explained that the first letter is the ''pre-sue'' missive, (chuckle) informed her that this was already being paid directly to Cr@pone, transferred me to Fredrickson Intl, and spoke to a very pleasant chap called Tom, so pleasant in fact I wished him a good weekend!

 

However he told me that if I am paying them direct then he will refer this back to them, like I said, they're happy to take the money each month to which he replied, if that's the case then there is no need for us.

 

Exactly I thought, there is zero need for any DCA.

 

I'll have to go over the call again but when I mentioned I had reported ''all'' of them, he inquired who I had reported and who to, told him BC was being reported to the SRA, and that Fredrickson Intl and FPC were being reported to the FCA for trying to exploit the debtors lack of knowledge by using different trading names when in fact they are the same company, and for using their tame pet solicitor BC.

 

All in all a successful late Friday call, bet they're not as chirpy first thing on a Monday?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well that was a turn up for the books I must say!

 

Letter from Cr@pital One today, acknowledging my complaint of harassing phone calls, up to four a day all blocked by Truecall, and as a GOGW they will be sending me a cheque for £75, yes, seventy five pounds, I had to read it a couple of time to be sure, but that's what they say?

 

I'll only believe that when it has cleared in my bank....still only getting £1 a month mind.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:phone: It really is the puppies privates, so glad I bought one, even bought one for my old dear too!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, cheque arrived Saturday for £75...in the bank today should be cleared in time for the weekends shenanigans....

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Had a cr@pone card, (Aqua) defaulted around £280, (£200 limit) been paying £1 a month now down to £218.

 

 

Two months after defaulting on the first Cr@pone card, managed to obtain another from Cr@pone, again £200 limit, defaulted, been paying £1 a month since.

 

 

Is their any scope in an IRL claim? Or shall I just suck it up and continue payments for the life of the debt?

 

 

TIA...Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit Cards more harder to do IRL claims on. I would say no in this case.

 

Its the lowest Credit Limit they do, but you passed their criteria checks.

TBH if i was you... £1 a month per debt is pretty good to keep them off your back :)

I wouldnt want the stress of this going to court. But to help more BB - Tell us the dates etc of cards and what happened to each.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who are you paying?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paying them direct, get the regular SOA, payments are reducing the amount.

 

 

Bit loathed to pay outright now that they have marked the CRF, so not much point really.

 

 

Took them out '14 when I was in my darkest deepest depths of bitterness and anger with the establishment (and MOD) Maxed them out.

 

 

 

Got them to refund all of the charges and stop all interest, even got a cheque for £75 out of them due to their harassment phone calls, up to six times a day, (good ole truecall)

 

 

Was only asking as looking to clear it up due to the missus wanting to get a mortgage, but after this mornings look through Experian, my score 580, and hers 533, we can safely say there isn't going to be any mortgage this year!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Cr@pone have sacked Fred's and sold the accounts to Lowlifes, who kindly sent a missive in the same envelope, and used the same paper and printer?

 

 

I had been paying £1 a month to cr@pone, for each card (£2) but seeing as they have flogged this on, I won't be changing bank details to fund the crooks, if payments bounce back from cr@pone then I'll take that as they no longer want paying.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cr@pone have sacked Fred's and sold the accounts to Lowlifes, who kindly sent a missive in the same envelope, and used the same paper and printer?

 

 

I had been paying £1 a month to cr@pone, for each card (£2) but seeing as they have flogged this on, I won't be changing bank details to fund the crooks, if payments bounce back from cr@pone then I'll take that as they no longer want paying.

 

I like your thinking, If only Freds and Lowells were separate... Oh wait they are not... So any money you pay to Freds goes to Lowell anyway... XD -

I wonder what would happen if you did continue to pay Freds for an - Imagine if they took legal action and you had been paying the whole time... That could be very interesting :)

 

"Claimant" - We notified the defendant that we had purchased the account in question... But he hasn't been paying us...

"Defendant" - But i have been paying them - *Shows that Lowell and Frederickson are 1 & The Same"

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the thing, even though Fred's et al Lowlifes owned the account, I have always paid cr@pone direct?

 

 

And they've been more than happy to accept the payment.....lers see what transpires.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Lowlifes picked up one of my old Capone accounts, ignored ignored ignored, dropped off credit file, ignored some more, then these two missives dropped through the door last week.

 

As you can see the first thing that springs out on Overdales missive is the word Solicitors, and the 'We're now instructed to recover the balance owed' and then on Lowlifes missive they call them 'debt collectors'? Confused?

 

Are these Overdales solicitors or debt collectors?

Is it worth a complaint to the SRA?

Lowlifes Edit.pdf Overdales Sols edit.pdf

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sols can act as a dca too and send scary powerless letters just to scam people into paying

 

when was you last payment >

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last payment off the top of my bonce must be 3 or 4 years ago now......I'll have to dig out my files, I do have a post on here about it somewhere.

 

It dropped off my CRF last year so it isn't affecting my CRF.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Cap1 cards - Lowell & Overdales Sols.....yawn...

Thank you DX for finding my old thread........wow is all I can say, I was not a well man back then!

 

So by going off my last post there's about another four years to run on this before it's time barred.....I shall wait and see how tenacious these new clowns are.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Overdales have gone into turbo mode, and sent me a ''Letter of claim'' no mention of the POFA although I do believe the layout of their threat letter meets the POFA requirements?

 

On the 16th June I received their ''notice of acting'' after lowlifes farmed it out to them and some 10 days later they sent me the letter of claim giving me 30 days before they will issue a CC claim, the wife is livid!!!!

 

She ''Does not want any of these letters being sent to our new house!'' 

 

Clearly they will be as I am not getting a CCJ by default of these bozos.

 

Fortunately I have all of the documents for this account, although they don't know this, I guess I can make them jump through those hoops, I've reclaimed all of the fees they charged previously so the amount they are claiming is the amount I owe, in theory.

 

I'm not going to respond immediately, but they are going to get a response, this is no longer on my CRF but as I kept it alive by paying £1 a month until 2018 this still has 4 years to run.

ilovepdf_merged.pdf

 

Unfortunately the files go in reverse? But if you scroll down to the bottom then page on is there...

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

click letter of claim and follow post 2 BB

 

POFA is nowt to do with CCa claims

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA and response in the mail today, lets see what they come back with and if it matches what I already have!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well day 21 and still no response to my CCA, although I do need to let them know of my new address that might spur them on....

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was not the cca sent using it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...