Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is there any vindication 18 months after tribunal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4368 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was bullied at work by a new practice manager, having been in post prior to her arrival for 4.5 years ~ I wasn't the only one. Two other employees were given disciplinaries during December/January ~ an unheard of situation in a small practice employing 25 people. Wrote to partners asking them to look into this, their response was to call me to disciplinary while I was off sick. I felt could no longer work in that situation, found another job but the offer was withdrawn because I was given a bad reference "she is very independently minded and this has lead to problems in the workplace". Colleagues at work were afraid to support me because of the harrassment and bullying that was going on at that time. Took my former employers to tribunal, represented myself while they had a barrister, heard this person lie under oath, one colleague appeared as a witness for me but I lost the case, at Bedford, after they deliberated for 3 weeks.

 

This practice manager has now left the practice under some sort of cloud, having had a grievance against her by another employee, and the partners have admitted that she caused them a lot of trouble. I don't know the details of her leaving, because it's being kept under wraps.

 

During this time I have suffered depression, have had no work (with the outstanding poor reference not helping), have been living on benefits but worst of all I lost the job I loved and was good at, and even lost the chance of a new job because of this person. Is there anything I can do now that it has been shown that she made a habit of bullying, harrassment and lies?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing that comes to my mind is civil court claim for harassment including that connected to references. You have got 6 years to bring such claim to county court. As ET has now been concluded however and you didn't claim victimisation from poor references, this might be your main obstacle to convince court why your claim should proceed.

Have you tried calling ACAS or other legal helplines... ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for responding. At the ET the poor reference was gone into in some depth and one of my employers was questioned quite critically about it, although it didn't form part of my claim of constructive dismissal, which was based on the bullying and harrassment.

 

So it might be possible to pursue this through the civil courts? I do feel very strongly about this and would like to do whatever I can, but would it be possible to get any help with legal costs for such a case?

 

I am now 60, was 58 when this first started, had worked all my life in NHS and education, without any problems about my work or with colleagues. This incident completely changed me, and my situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you find someone else from your previous job that could provide references? What was your job specification? Perhaps there were other senior members of staff you were working with on a daily basis and who could act as the referees? Their opinion also counts.

 

If you received those bad references after you resigned, then it would be illogical to include this aspect in your constructive dismissal claim. I was rather wondering whether you later issued another claim to ET, of victimisation in the form of bad references, claim of which would probably be combined with the rest of the case.

 

As for the help with legal costs, I can only advice to contact CAB, I'm afraid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cadusea

 

Personally i would do a SAR to your previous employer asking for a coy of that reference given to new employer, as they are not allowed to give a bad reference these days if im wrong please correct me

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen the reference ~ I asked for a copy from the organisation which offered me the job and subsequently withdrew the offer after they received the reference.

 

It was done on a printed form, and the first part was glowing as to my abilities. All, that is, except the last sentence, which said

" C is very independently minded and this has lead to problems in the workplace".

 

Then a tick box question: would you employ this person again? And the response was NO

 

Prior to the arrival of the new manager all had been well at my workplace ~ I had been there 4.5 years with absolutely no problems, quite the reverse in fact. My hours and my responsibilities had been increased over that time, from 12 hours initially, and ending up with 35 hours per week. If I had been poor at my work, or a trouble-maker, surely this would not have happened. It was a very small place, employing approx 25 people, some part-time, some full-time. Furthermore it was a completely non-hierarchical organisation with input from employees being welcomed, until the arrival of the new manager.

 

I know this would all appear to be finished and done with, but it has had a tremendous effect on my life and confidence and now that the person chiefly responsible for this has been "found out" I really need some way, if possible, of achieving some recompense (not necessarily financial) for what happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

No media people at my ET, certainly no one taking notes. My employer answered several of the judge's questions with a lie and I was not allowed to come back to that (represented myself). The judgement was not decided on the day but when I received the ruling 3 weeks later I felt it was a Pyrrhic victory because I'd seen and heard her lying under oath about a factual matter. Not a lot of comfort, but I knew she'd lied, and she knew she'd lied and several other people in the room knew it too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree. Although they lied rather well, they know that I know that they know that are liars. I am sure that the judge knew that they were lying too as he would have had about 30 years experience of porkies but it did not seem to matter all that much. Appaling nonetheless.

 

I take it that you won but I understand what you mean about the Pyrrhic victory. I could not have faced representing myself and really admire you for doing that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, my mistake ~ not really Pyrrhic ~ I lost my case, even tho' it seemed to be going my way towards the end. What I meant was that even tho' I lost, I felt I'd won because I looked into her eyes while she was giving evidence and knew she was lying on oath. So sorry folks, got the expression wrong, but hope you all understand what I mean.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...