Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

BOS - the fun begins


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well I just had a lovely chat with the phone banking bods. Phoned up and went through the usual press this button rigmarole before speaking to a real person. This is not verbatim, but it is the gist :)

 

Operator: Hello, my name is xxx, how can I help you?

Me: Hello. I've heard a lot in the news about bank charges being unlawful in that they are excessive and as such amount to a penalty. I'd like to arrange for the charges I have paid to be refunded.

 

long pause...I kept quiet and waited for her to decide what to do :)

 

Operator: Please hold.

piped music for ages. New voice on the other end.

 

Manager: Hello MrsMiggins, my name is xxx, I'm one of the managers here. I understand that you want to talk about charges on your account.

Me: Yes. I understand that the law says that you are only allowed to charge for actual losses incurred by the bank. I believe that the charges applied to my account amount to a penalty and I would like them refunded.

Manager: The charges you have paid are listed in the terms and conditions so you have agreed to them.

Me: If the charges are unlawful it doesn't matter whether or not they are in the T&Cs, they are still unlawful so I'd like you to issue a refund.

Manager: But if you got a parking ticket and overstayed for 5 minutes you'd still have to pay.

Me: I'm sorry, but parking tickets are issued under the Road Traffic Act; we're talking about contract law so parking tickets are irrelevant. Can you explain to me how the £30 charge is calculated?

Manager: The charge covers our costs in returning a payment, looking at the account, deciding what to do.

Me: As far as I can see your system pays a DD and then automatically issues a letter and charges me. Are you saying that it costs the bank £30 to do that? If the £30 charge covers your costs I'd like an invoice for those costs please so I can see what I'm paying for.

Manager: I'm sorry, I can't give you that.

Me: Why not?

Manager: I don't have it.

Me: But surely you can get it? Someone at the bank obviously worked out the charge, so it must be possible to say what it's made up of?

Manager: Sorry, but I don't have this information and I can't get it for you.

Me: Why not? It's not reasonable for you to provide a service but be unwilling to give me details on exactly what that service is. If you can't tell me what I'm paying for I think you should refund the charges.

Manager:I'm sorry, but I can't do that. Your branch manager might be able to do that for you.

Me: So you're telling me I should speak to my branch manager and he might be able to agree to refund the charges?

Manager: Yes.

Me: OK, I'll do that.

call ends

 

The call went exactly as I thought it would with him constantly justifying the charges as reasonable and referring to the T&Cs. I was on the phone for over 5 minutes and almost had him admit that the charge was a penalty but he stopped himself in the nick of time :twisted:

 

I'm now going to steal bits of Falkirk1298's letter and write to the manager of my Branch. This is fun. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

VERY nice. I don't suppose you recorded that call, by any chance? I particularly like the "I don't have the info and can't get it for you" piece. And to think we entrust all our money to these people!!!! :shock:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No recording unfortunately. The funniest bits were firstly the prolonged silence from the person who answered the phone as soon as I told them why I was calling. I nearly said "hello, are you still there?" but I thought it'd be better if I waited for her to decide what to say instead. :lol:

Secondly the amount of squirming, uuhming and aahing was unbelievable. I'd imagine that manager-bloke will be doing some research and possibly some role-playing to practice his obfuscation techniques. :roll:

 

Their complete refusal to provide a breakdown of the charges wasn't a surprise but I laboured the point anyway just to make him squirm. This forum is a bad influence! :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interestingly I've just had an almost identical conversation with BoS, they kept referring me to the T&C's and told me it was an administration charge. When I asked them how this was calculated I was initially told that they didn't have that information and then that they were unable to disclose it. I was then referred to my local branch manager (I think in their attempt to get rid of me!). We agreed that we were going round in circles & I voiced my concern that they didn't really understand their job - I was getting a little frustrated at this point!!!

 

All this for being £6.30 overdrawn for 24 hours!!!! Am now determined to persue them for refunds for the last few years!

 

Feel better now for venting my frustrations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No recording unfortunately. The funniest bits were firstly the prolonged silence from the person who answered the phone as soon as I told them why I was calling. I nearly said "hello, are you still there?" but I thought it'd be better if I waited for her to decide what to say instead. :lol:

Secondly the amount of squirming, uuhming and aahing was unbelievable. I'd imagine that manager-bloke will be doing some research and possibly some role-playing to practice his obfuscation techniques. :roll:

 

Their complete refusal to provide a breakdown of the charges wasn't a surprise but I laboured the point anyway just to make him squirm. This forum is a bad influence! :wink:

 

You may not have a recording - but they will have. Ask for a copy under terms of DPA.

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good idea.Please let us know if you try this and their response.

I tried this with a debt collector who claimed that they don`t put anything in writing and don`t have to prove the debt either.Naturally,when asked,they claimed not to have a recording and to have not said any of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could actually do with a forum's eye view of what I should do next. I am aware from reading here that they might continue to claim that the charges do only "cover their costs", so I'm now thinking that instead of hitting them with a demand for repayment on threat of action I might be best to do the DPA thing and get something in writing from them noting any 'manual interventions' or lack thereof before I go further. This would, of course, delay things but I'm not in a hurry so it might be the prudent course of action? Any thoughts?

 

With reference to the conversation I had with them, while it was fun I'm not sure it would actually be much use, other than as evidence that they won't tell me what they are charging me for. Surely the DPA request for charges/manual intervention info gets me what I need in that regard anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid the banks won't do anything if you ask them nicely...get your DPA letter off, tell them you are counting downwards from 40. When you get DPA info, calculate what you have been charged and come back to the forum

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Furthermore, when you get the info, please could you let us have a copy anything that would show manual intervention? (tricky, that, since there won't be, lol, but you know what I mean, I hope)

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL, I have had loads of conversation like that over the years, they still make me chuckle. Wish I had written them down like yourself.

 

With regards to the audio recordings of the conversations. I have tried in the past to obtain these (via telephoning), but came up with the run around. I think it would be best if you could record the date and time and where you phoned and the person, them write to the DPA and quote this asking for them. Although if they discard of them every 30 days, that takes you out of the 40 day period and they can just claim that it has been discarded :(

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, after some work-related delays I've finally got around to making my DPA request. Easy enough - I phoned the phone-banking service and asked for a note of the charges on my account going back 5 years. After a short while on hold the woman on the other end of the phone said they'd send me a letter with them all listed. No mention of a charge or anything and I didn't even have to use the DPA to get them to agree to send the details. (Am I paranoid if I start to think there are notes on my file saying "warning, customer knows we are at it!!)

 

Incidentally, as part of my job I have to send letters to customers. These letters are automated to a lesser extent than I believe the banks' are. Our procedure is:

 

1. Order is updated resulting in a system 'flag' changing status from 'No' to 'Yes' (this is done as part of a separate updating process, not manually for each individual order)

2. Report is run to capture the orders requiring a letter (this captures customer name and address data and anything else that goes on the letter)

3. System decides the which letter will be sent depending on the results of point 2 above. For example we send different letters depending on whether or not our customer has an outstanding balance

4. Letters are printed

5. Staff member puts the letters through the letter folding/envelope stuffing machine

6. Staff member puts envelopes through the franking machine and into the mail bag

 

Now it takes 1 person 2 hours as an absolute max, start to finish, to do about 1000 letters. Add labour, costs for postage, paper and envelopes together and I'd estimate the real cost per letter for my company at 35-40p. Even if it's double that I reckon that's a more reasonable estimate than the exorbitant rates the banks are charging, particularly given that their process is most likely fully automated.

 

I would love to stand up in court and question the bank about the actual cost of sending me an excess OD letter. :twisted:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/06/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...