Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

OK now they got me mad !!....Andyman v RBOS cc


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I decided to get the bit between my teeth with RBOS after months of stalling etc...:mad:

OK so I finally, after 4 phone calls today, and everybody trying to deflect me from the correct department, finally got through to Lesley Sandford in the Royal Bank of Scotland Credit card customer care team (disputes department). She reckons that she's the head honcho there, so I asked her why she would not settle my small claim for £335 after I had evidence that they had settled many others of higher value before court.

She absolutely refused to budge, and said she would see me in court.

Strong tactics from RBOS !

I pointed out that RBOS has never defended a claim in court to this day, she refused to comment,

I asked her then, if in that case I was going to be THE test case (which would be big news for the press !), and they were going to defend me in court, she refused to comment. I asked her for the name of the solicitor involved in settling the disputes, she refused to give me his name.

I asked her to confirm that they knew that the claim would increase by £120 for court costs, and if they were fully aware that they would have to pay me the increased sum, and she was taking the resposibility for that, she said that she fully understood, but i would still have to go to court.

so court here I come !!!!!.....................bring it on.:mad:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

:cool:

In the words of QUINCY JONES:

" It's not about your acheivements in life, it's all about the journey getting there...."

.

I got my Peices of Eight !;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a feeling that in reality she is only "doing her job"......... and she probably has customer service guidelines on how to answer calls like yours without compromising the overall banks legal position.

 

Just stick to your deadlines and as you say bring on the court..... ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes atlantic, they're all just doing their jobs, (it's not they're money after all), however this lady had a bit of a swagger about her, and made me get (unecessarily) annoyed with her about the whole thing.

 

after all, we all know they're going to settle in the end, so why put up the pretense, just PAY UP, and spare the court system for more important things !!!!:mad:

 

aaarghhhhhhh......................................................

-------------------------------------------------------------------

:cool:

In the words of QUINCY JONES:

" It's not about your acheivements in life, it's all about the journey getting there...."

.

I got my Peices of Eight !;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do know where you're coming from - bank staff can sometimes be really arrogant................ but still..... we'll be smiling when they are forced to pay up in the end!!! ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...