Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sueinsurrey vs RBS -Advice needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6177 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Am assisting a person with a disability. He did not need to request statements as had original 6 years. He created his own list of charges which included Charges, Interest and Referral fees but his letter requested they repay the charges only which amounted to 1564.90

Having no luck with RBS he sent a follow up letter stating if he hadn't heard within 14 days he intended to claim the full amount together with interest. They did respond offering a small amount. He wrote again stating offer was unacceptable and that if he had not received a satisfactory offer within another 14 days would claim full amount together with interest up to the date of judgement and court fees and said he would commence court proceedings on 30 March if not heard from them. This was done via MCOL as no satisfactory response from RBS. Cobbetts defended claim and court date (small claims track) is set for 28 June. I see that Royalties Gold Account's charge £12 month which is incorporated in the charges on the statement, so should this £12 have been deducted from the claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £12 monthly fee should have been deducted from the claim as this is a service charge.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rory32, so that I understand fully then, when Advice of Service Charge for a certain period states:

The charge is based on a Maintenance Charge of £28.00

Plus a fee of £12.00

Service charge to be applied £40.00

This means can only claim for the maintenance charge of £28.00

Sorry to be so thick!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your not being thick - it can be a little complicated at first re wht you can claim back and what you can't. It's better to ask than just plough on.

 

The £12 fee is a monthly fee for this type of account (and the benefits that go with it - personally I would advise against holding this type of account as most people pay the monthly fee but never use any of the benefits). You can not claim this back. You can only claim the £28 maintenance charge back as this is a penalty charge (so is an unlawful charge).

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rory32. When taking into consideration the charges claimed which were unjustified, the disabled person I am assisting has decided to accept the RBS offer. So that I don't do this wrong for him, please confirm that if he signs the form which they sent him stating "I accept the offer in full and final settlement" should he send a accompanying letter saying payment is to be by cheque as he closed his account a while ago and should he wait until cheque received before informing court the claim has been settled. I am worried about the time because the directions applying to the claim need to be with the court on 14 June and I really am exhausted with this and don't really want to work on it much longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

should he send a accompanying letter saying payment is to be by cheque

Yes - even if the acount wasn't closed it is his money to do with as he wishes.

 

should he wait until cheque received before informing court the claim has been settled

No - he should wait until the cheque has cleared his account before informing the court the claim has been settled. Until the cheque has cleared his bank account he does not have the sum of money agreed as settlement.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he hasn't received it or it hasn't cleared you can ask for the case to be set aside (this does not cancel the court claim, only delays it). I would ask the court clerk about this - they will be able to advise how you do this.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your advice, will speak to the court clerk on Tuesday. Thanks for your guidance. The person I am helping has been deaf since birth and has numerous communication difficulties. Why the bank sold him this type of account I do not know, or do I!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we both know why the did Sue. Unfortunately it's just another example of their abhorant business practices.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a thought about the £12 fees. You could complain to the bank about misselling the account. This onviously would be a seperate claim from the bank charges.

 

The banks then have 8 weeks to resolve the matter. If they don't resolve it after 8 weeks, or have sent you a definate no your not getting any money back letter, you can make a complaint to the FOS who may find in your friends favour due to his disabilities. It's always worth a try - although I would wait until your friends got his money for the unlawful charges first before making the misselling complaint.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it had crossed my mind as I know he wouldn't of understood the terms of the account. However I'll deal with the unlawful charges first. Do you think this wording in the letter will be OK:

 

"I wish to accept your offer of ........but only with the following conditions:

1) the amount is paid to me in a cheque made payable to me.

2) When the cheque has cleared I will then inform the court I have agreed settlement.

I have signed your acceptance form and marked it accordingly with these conditions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds fine.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...