Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
    • Thanks very much Bank. I've now done a lot of reading and have drafted my Letter of Claim as attached. I look forward to your comments. 16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf
    • ive already CAREFULLY explained how it all works earlier. what you will have to pay is already preset and detailed on the court forms/TfL stuff you already have. you wont be asked any questions upon your financial means etc. thats not under debate . you wont be asked upon any mitigating circumstances, you have pleaded guity which you always SHOULD.  the ONLY 2 reasons you are attending is to: 1) after finding the TfL prosecutor... plead directly face to face before you go in to try and get an OOC (you can bring up or say anything/everything you like ...anything that might get them to agree) 2) if 1 fails...show your genuine remorse face to face to the magistrate, BRIEFLY mention how a criminal record would hinder your future then hope they take pity on you and dont also record this on your file.  PS its only declarable/shows there for one year anyway. regardless to what an employer might ask in job questionnaires past 1yrs you forget about it. they cannot see it even on enhanced DBS etc etc. you should not latterly ever appeal a criminal record for this type (1yrs)  of 'offence' its not worth it and if you lose said appeal it will cost your dear in terms of additional wages grabbing and court fees. and extends the time it shows if you lose too. dx  
    • hit letter of claim follow post 2 despite repeated requests, the claimant has failed to produce any enforceable paperwork.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

SWIFT ADVANCES - Has Anyone Won?


Poppy07
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5839 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, we have two accounts with Swift advances, sent off SAR and worked out they owe us about £1500 in charges on each account, sent first letter and also LBA, but Swift won't give in so I am going to submit court papers via MCOL.

Just wondering has anybody won against Swift? Do they settle or do they take you to court?

Thanks

POPPY07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Be aware they will go all the way.

 

They seem to refund a portion of the default notice, reducing it to around £250 so you will get the excess. But apart from that your in for a long haul

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've submitted via MCOL for the charges Swift Advances have put on my account. Have only done one of the accounts for the mo to see how it goes.

Will keep you updated when/if I get a reply!

xx

POPPY07

Link to post
Share on other sites

swift are resilient to any claim against them - i tried to get admin charges back, they flatley refused, then referred me to the FISA / FLA who can't handle such matters. Swift also claim to be a small company, so can justify overheads and manual intervention. Their profits were in excess of £30 million last year, so they aren't such a poor relation after all!!!

 

I'm taking them on through trading standards.:lol:

Halifax - paid out without getting to court - £250 WON - no intention of going, stated too costly!!

Halifax no 2 account - paid out without a fight - (by mistake, £1650 - should have been £1200 - had to pay some back)

Link to post
Share on other sites

no - this is because it is in relation to a mortgage exit fee.

It seems that no one as an authority has teeth with these people!:mad:

 

Googd luck with your claim tho'

Halifax - paid out without getting to court - £250 WON - no intention of going, stated too costly!!

Halifax no 2 account - paid out without a fight - (by mistake, £1650 - should have been £1200 - had to pay some back)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Swift acknowledged my claim on the 26.06.06, though I haven't received anything through the post from them I just saw this on the website. They now have until the 17th July to enter a defence! Getting a bit scary as nobody seems to have claimed against Swift, not sure what they're gonna do next!!!

Help Anyone???

POPPY07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone got anything to say re Swift Advances?? Anyone won their charges back or early redemption fees????

 

xx

 

I have moved you here to the mortgages forum - have a read here for a previous case v swift.

Are you claiming back ERC or just charges?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I'll have a read when I get a minute. I'm just claiming back the charges for now - £35 for a letter etc!!! Just waiting for them to enter their defence, which I'll copy onto here.

Quite scary though as Barclays and Nationwide settled and I more or less knew they would, for some reason I think Swift are going to be tougher to crack, and court bundles etc will all be new territory to me! Plus there isn't a lot re Swift on here!

I'll get there tho, and the end of the day they're the ones who'll have to justify their outrageous charges in court!

xx

POPPY07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean the following by saying draft letter?

Me –v- Swift Advances

Claim No:

Date Issued: 14th June 2007

Please find enclosed a schedule of penalty charges, along with interest claimed at the annual rate of 8% pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act. The interest in addition to the amount in charges equates to the total amount of my claim, namely £

I respectfully request that the enclosed schedule should be attached to the particulars of my claim.

Yours sincerely,

I sent this letter along with schedule of charges to Swift and to the Court. Do I need to do anything else? They say they are going to defend, so will see what they come back with, they're is nothing else I can do for now is there?

Thanks x

POPPY07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone help me? I have sent the above letter, outlined in my reply #13, do I need to send anything else at this stage? I'm waiting for Swift to enter their defence - they have until the 17th July.

~I need to get everything right with Swift and I'm not 100% sure what I'm doing!!!

xx

POPPY07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please Someone Help!!! There seems to be no info re Swift at all!!!

Swift have entered a defence against my claim, this is it:

1. It is admitted and averred that:

(1) the Claimant and one other (it was a joint app) took out a loan ("the credit agreement") with the Defendent and the loan was secured against the Claimant's property by deed dated 7 Dec 05 ("the mortgage");

(2) the Claimant and other defaulted in their obligations to pay the agreed monthly installments uner the credit agreement, the first default being on the date for the first repayment which fell on 7 January 2006;

(3) charges were added to the Clamaint and others' mortgage account in accordance with a tariff of charges provided to the Claimant and other upon completion of the mortgage.

 

2. By reason of the Claimant and other being joint borrowers their obligations to the Defendent under the credit agreement and mortgage were joint obligations; accordingly, in respect of any action against the Defendent for breach of contract (liability for which is denied) the other is a necessary party to the action and unless and until she is added by the Claimant as a party, the action is not properly constituted. In the circumstances the Defendant will invite the court to dismiss the claim. The following matters are pleaded without prejudice to the said plea that the Claimant's claim is not at present properly constituted and cannot therefore be determined.

 

3. Copies of the credit agreement and the legal charge are appended hereto marked Appendix 'A'.

 

4. Claimant and others account was in default from the outset: the claimant and others first installment which was due on 7 Jan 06 was returned unpaid: from the due date for paument of the third installment (7 march 06) until redemption in Jan 07, the claimant and other mortgage account remained in default at all times.

 

5. The Credit Agreement contained the following, among other, provisions:

"D. if you pay us by cheque, standing order or direct debit and we cannot collect the payment when we ask for it, you will have to pay a charge for this. This charge will include all bank and other charges we have to pay as a result of our trying to collect the payment.

K1) if you do not make any monthly payment on the date it is due, we may (as well as enforcing our rights under this agreement) make the charges mentioned overleaf including those for each and every letter we send to, or receive from, you or your agents and for each telephone conversation about any missed payments.

L. ...you must pay the following

1) all reasonable costs and expenses we have to pay or decide to charge as a result of any term of this agreement or the legal charge being broken

2) all other reasonable costs and expenses we have to pay or decide to charge in connection with this agreement or the legal charge...

 

6. The sums that were charged to the claimant and others' mortgage account were applied pursuant to the contractual entitlement under the terms of the credit agreement (as set out in part above) in respect of, among other things, the said missed payments, letters and telephone calls.

 

7. Accordingly, it denied that any sum debited to the Claimant and other's mortgage account was a "penalty" or "unfair penalty" whether at common law or under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulation 1999.

 

8. In the premises it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the sum claimed or any sum for the reasons stated or for any reasons and it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to any interest.

 

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

The Defendent believes that the facts stated in this Defence are true.

I am duly authorised by the defendent to sign this statement

Matthew William Payne.

 

Swift sent this defence to me, and I received again this morning from the court along with an AQ, which I have just completed and attached a draft directions letter as advised in the guidance on this site. What else do I need to do? Do I need to ammend my claim so that the joint applicant is mentioned? Please can someone help me, as I think the court is gonna throw this out! I've paid £120 for court fee and £100 for AQ which I cannot afford to lose and I don't want Swift to keep getting away with it!!!! Any help on what my next step should be would be very very much appreciated!

Thanks

x

POPPY07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I have recently paid off my Swift Advance. The settlement fee was horrendous. I found out that it was interest only when I thought I had taken out a repayment loan (my fault). The rep who came to my house was very charming and I signed the papers. A couple of days later he rang and said that a paper had not been signed. I met him in a service station (not a good move) and signed the paper without reading it as I thought it was one I had already read. Would think this is where it changed from repayment to interest only.

 

I found I had to pay off over £2,000 in totally unexpected charges let alone the original sum, an incredible amount for early settlement etc.

 

I see there are quite a few posts about Swift so has anyone else been mislead and has anyone managed to get any money back from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...