Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Baldilocks. Welcome to CAG. I've done some minor formatting edits to your post to make it easier to read for people on mobile. Try to keep to 1 or 2 sentences max before creating a line break in your post. It's the Consumer Rights Act 2015, not the Sale of Goods Act 2015. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 superseded The Sale Of Goods Act 1979 and the latter does not apply as I imagine this purchase was made after 1st October 2015. Can you confirm the make and model of the vehicle? Some vehicles have their service history stored within the on board computers now or have it available to view online at any point. How did you pay for the vehicle? Finance (what type), Debit/Credit Card etc? I would argue, that should the above points not be correct, you would be right to claim that the goods are not as described under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.  
    • Thanks everyone for all your help, but unfortunately my case was dismissed. This is the 2nd time I've had this happen now so I doubt ill be taking on any parking firms in future sadly. The judge said I lost it on the grounds that the sign said I had 28 days to declare who the owner of the vehicle was, and said I should have complied with this.  My costs are Judgment for the claimant £133.33 Issue fee Hearing fee Solicitors costs - total £265 grand total £398.33 Do those costs look about right?
    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Google sacked 28 staff members for taking part in protests against a contract with the Israeli government.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

garygumps v Northern Bank (NI) ***SETTLED***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6082 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, new member here. Have finally taken the plunge to claim back my chargesa and stuff, but need a bit of clarification on something.

 

My bank, Northern NI, used to charge fixed routine amounts for setting up/cancelling and even amending direct debits and standing orders. Having recieved my list of charges from the bank, can these be included in my claim? Or should I just stick with the overdraft/interest and stuff?

 

Thank you

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

These are probably legitimate charges as they are actually providing a service. How much did they charge?

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

Gary, just confirm who your bank is, I cant find a Northern NI.

 

Let me know, and I will see if anyone else has had this problem.

 

The basics are this though, anything that is a 'charge' can be claimed, anything thats for a 'service' cannot. So, if they justify the DD/SO thing as a service, you cant claim it back (how much was the charge?), if it is a charge, the question is how much did it actually cost them, if its a lot less than thay charged you, then its a penalty.

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick replies guys.

 

My bank is Northern Bank from Northern Ireland (they of the BIG £26M robbery of a few years ago LOL)

 

They used to charge £4.50 for setting up a DD/SO and £8.50 for cancelling it!!!

 

I used to hate having to pay these at the time (they dont anymore, hmmm), especially the difference between setting one up and stopping it!!!

 

I don't think myself to include them, as over the 6 years they only add uo to about £100, and the other fees and charges are over £1000 so won't be too greedy!!!! LOL

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Does the preliminary letter ( and all subsequent letters) need to be sent Recorded Delivery, or is ordinary post OK.

 

Its just, I've seen people advised to send their SAR by recorded.

 

Many thanks

 

Gary

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ChloeJane

Hi Gary!

 

Just a quick post to check that you don't forget the £10!

 

Sure you have read it already but just in case to be sure -

 

1. Data Protection Act, Subject Access Request letter - List of charges

 

Under the data protection act, the bank has what is called the Data Controller - they are usually located at the head office.

 

A copy of the act is here.

 

Data Protection Act 1998

 

While the branch may accept the request - they will have to forward it the data controller which is head office.

 

So....................... .........

 

 

Send the letter addressed to :

 

Data Controller

Banks Head office Address

 

Include £10 which is a fee they have a right to charge under the act and ensure you get proof of postage.

 

You can than spend the 40 days waiting for the information but can look around at what the tiimetable will be and what steps are next.

 

A great link is below which sets out a sample of the process. The links are on the right.

 

www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

All the best with your claim,

CJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Chloe, but I've already got my data protection details. Its the actual letter claiming my refund i'm talking about.

 

I'm going to send it recorded just to be safe.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Gary.

 

Looks like you've got things under control. Start a thread in the Northern Bank Forum and keep people updated with your claim. It's in the same forum as the Yorkshire Bank and Clydesdale Bank.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

 

Letter received today acknowledging receipt of claim and saying that they are investigating and that "they take complaints very seriously....." blah blah blah. They also say that I should hear from them within next 20 working days.......yeah right.:rolleyes:

 

Also enclosed "Putting things right" leaflet on complaints proceedure.

 

They seem to be treating this as a complaint, hmmmmm. WRONG!:razz:

 

Gary

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best of luck Gary.

 

It will be interesting to see how they react to your claim seeing as they are no longer part of the Australian Group.

Especially interesting as i opened my parachute account with the Northern. Had a nice chat with the bloke dealign with it and asked him about what it was like for the staff now workign for Danske instead of NAG. He reckoned they were alot easier to deal with and alot more customer friendly thanh the last lot....then he would say that wouldnt he!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ChloeJane

Hi Gary,

 

Well I guess onwards as they say and the next bit is the letter before action!

 

A link is here.

3. Letter before action - Consumer version - asking for it back

 

Send the letter off and wait the 14 days!

As you are so on target, thought I would give you some extra reading for the next step, so as soon as you get a response back, or hear nothing...

you can file.

INFORMATION ON FILING IN COURT

Fees

You can apply for an exemption through the court when you file your claim so it is worth a read and if in hardship, worth applying.

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/H...fl ets_id=172

 

 

Money claim online - OFFERS NO FEE EXEMPTION

5. Money Claim On-Line (MCOL) Particulars of Claim

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/71369-getting-mcol-right.html

N1 at your local court. Preferred - fee exemption allowed.

4. Particulars of claim - N1 - hard copy version

Reading the above and having informed choices so your confident and know what suits you is why I have added the information, so you can ask questions till the waiting time for a reply to the letter is up.

Happy reading and all the best with your claim!

CJ

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At least you are within the Northern Ireland small claims limit Gary.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I intend to use the Small Claims Court and not MCOL. I think it will just look more serious;) .

 

I've used the NI Small Claims Court service before a few years ago very successfully:D . Even actually had to go into court that day, but by all accounts i shouldn't even have to get that far for this case..........hopefully.

 

Deadline date for next letter is 25th May.

 

Gary

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see what you mean, but MCOL gives the same end result, a court claim which is serious. It's academic really with you being in Northern Ireland. I have to be honest and say that I think yours is the first Northern Bank claim I have seen, although they have only been added to this forum since the Whistleblower revelations.

 

This will be interesting to see how they respond.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sarah, I missed that one. I used to know every thread in this forum, but I can't keep up with them all now.

 

Good thing people support each other. Don't you just love this site?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see what you mean, but MCOL gives the same end result, a court claim which is serious. It's academic really with you being in Northern Ireland. I have to be honest and say that I think yours is the first Northern Bank claim I have seen, although they have only been added to this forum since the Whistleblower revelations.

 

This will be interesting to see how they respond.

Hi caro, Lickthewallfatboy won and the Northern settled with me for the 1st claim. had to split it and my court date is on the 25th May. I sent a pm asking if i should be sending a court bundle or just bring it with me to the court hearing? Nobody seems to be replying>

nervous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...