Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
    • who gave you the NTH? who was it sent to? thread title updated dx  
    • blimey CAG gave all that FREE help over +6mts and +100 posts and they never even bothered to comeback...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Homer J v YB - ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST !


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6529 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well you may have read through other peoples posts that my partner and I are in the process of reclaiming some charges from the Yorkshire Bank. To briefly outline the story so far:

 

DSA = Data Subject Access

ICO = Information Commissioners Office

 

Wrote to bank asking for a DSA.

Response - no can do

Spoke to bank to discuss DSA

Response - still no can do

Letter confirming this and cheque returned.

Spoke to ICO - was told to put copy transactions rather than Statements

Letter to Bank to request copy transactions

Complaint lodged with ICO.

Estimated Charges guessed by us and court claim started.

Still no response from bank after 40 days

ICO spoke with bank - no response after 14 days

Contacted ICO - ICO advised they would make contact with bank

Bank contacted me to say they would give copy of transactions within 7 days

Bank Acknowledge and Defend Claim. Instruct external sols with list of transactions.

Copy Statements for one account and not other 3 arrive on doorstep 7 days later.

Correspond with solicitor having seen defence filed and sols ask for 1 month stay.

Still waiting copy statements from bank for other accounts.

 

So this is where we are today - our one month stay officially ends over the weekend and I am told by the solicitors that an offer is in the post. The offer has transpired to be less than the actual charges applied against our account 4 years ago, no offer to reimburse court fees or anything - another delay tactic! Do not go there if anybody else gets this far!

 

I have told them that we are unable to accept anything less than the actual losses incurred and gave them until close of business today to make that offer to avoid a court hearing. No response so it now seems as though we are going to have to go to court.

 

Maybe we will be the landmark case? Anyway, I am really looking forward to it and I know that we have the sufficient ammo to argue these punitive and unlawful charges.

 

I will keep you all posted on how it goes.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey. When you say 'going to court,' do you mean you will be raising the claim on Tuesday? If so, then it is a fair bet that they will settle quite soon.

 

But anyway, good luck...you are obviously very determined to get your money back.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey. When you say 'going to court,' do you mean you will be raising the claim on Tuesday? If so, then it is a fair bet that they will settle quite soon.

 

But anyway, good luck...you are obviously very determined to get your money back.

 

The banks sols asked for a 1 month stay, I agreed as I thought the sols had realised what a mess the bank had made of all this. We have failed to reach an agreement as their offer was about 50% of what I needed to claim my charges back and court fees. I now have to write to the court and say that mediation has failed and I want a hearing!

 

I am determined and I really think that they want to go for it. I did put in my last letter to them that I was not afraid to be the landmark case should they proceed to gain an actual judgement - which I am not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that they have shot themselves in the foot. You indicated that you would raise a claim, they requested a stay, and you granted this to them. As far as the judge is concerned (assuming it does get there) you have been more than reasonable, have acceded to all requests for more time, and have explored every avenue to settle without recourse to court.

 

I think they should just cough up now, and save embarrassing themselves further. But good luck nonetheless.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we stand a good chance too.

 

I just hope that their legal eagles dont start baffling us with all the legal jargon. I guess, I will just have them to get them to explain everything if they do!

 

I have a few points that I want to focus on and I know its all about getting the judge to side with you over the other party and believe I can do this with

 

Failure to comply with DPA

Failure to supply information required

The fact that they have admitted that the charges they applied were pre-estimates of losses and not actual losses.

The whole contractual law and liquidated damages argument too.

 

I have supporting letters from others where they are still refusing the DSA requests to their customers.

 

I hope that I can paint a very nice picture.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool! Go get 'em Homer. I would have thought that if they try and baffle you with legal jargonese, any reasonable judge should ensure that you are able to understand them. Not quite the same I know, but my son was recently a juror on quite a big case, and the judge explained everything to the jury so they understood all of the legal side. We await with bated (NB Spiceskull) breath. :rolleyes:

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good lad, get bloody stuck into this horrible, disgusting lot!

** I AM NOT A LAWYER, PLEASE CONSULT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT **

 

I have successfully claimed against: "MBNA, Capital One, Bank of Scotland & Clydesdale Bank"

 

The Consumer Action Group is a Self-Help website, Moderators & Site Helpers offer advice on a voluntary basis. Please spend time reading the FAQ's, and other cases relating to your bank before starting your own claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

The judge wont allow them to confuse you, he/she will explain everything to you in layman's terms. In fact in my experience of self-representing (it was actually in a family law case) the judges get really narky with solicitors/barristers who try to get the upper hand by using legal jargon.

 

I dont even think it will get that far though, I think they will settle before you get there.

 

Good luck

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll not be far behind you fella. They're already 3 days past the last deadline i gave them, but they have now said they will get back to me but need more time. i am giving more time in the hope it works for me should the case go to court. i will be taking paperwork and fee's to court next monday at 9am if i haven't heard from them by then!

Up The Mariners

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant!

 

Was that after your estimated claim? Have they paid out on the full amount?

** I AM NOT A LAWYER, PLEASE CONSULT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT **

 

I have successfully claimed against: "MBNA, Capital One, Bank of Scotland & Clydesdale Bank"

 

The Consumer Action Group is a Self-Help website, Moderators & Site Helpers offer advice on a voluntary basis. Please spend time reading the FAQ's, and other cases relating to your bank before starting your own claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes we had a pre-estimate amount. The amount was not correct and they finally sent copies of all statements for us to check. They offered us a portion, we kindly said no and told them that the only acceptable resolution was full payment plus the court fees that we had incurred.

 

Having received the accurate figures plus interest they decided that "without prejudice save as to costs" that they would accept this rather than go to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. Seems it was a case of wait and see whose nerve would hold out the longest, and you have won hands down. Of course you did have right on your side as well.

 

Don't forget the survey and I am sure a donation would be appreciated.:D

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent work Sire! Congratulations and be sure to raise yourself a glass of whatever poisen works for you on my behalf!

 

Finger crossed in a few weeks I'll be part of this fabulous club too!

 

Again, well done mate - thanks for your help too, not sure I'd be making as much progress against this lot without it.

 

:cool:

** I AM NOT A LAWYER, PLEASE CONSULT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT **

 

I have successfully claimed against: "MBNA, Capital One, Bank of Scotland & Clydesdale Bank"

 

The Consumer Action Group is a Self-Help website, Moderators & Site Helpers offer advice on a voluntary basis. Please spend time reading the FAQ's, and other cases relating to your bank before starting your own claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

You give me more attention than I require. lol

 

Thanks to all the support and I will be donating shortly... Yorkshire or clydesdale will not resist and I hope that EVERYBODY PERSISTS

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do deserve it. Don't forget the survey too if you haven't already done it.

 

What with this, and suddenly agreeing that they will respond to DPA requests (as if they have a choice :cool: )YB and Clydesdale are finally beginning to toe the line.:p

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6529 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...