Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I could do with your help and support please.

 

I am in a situation where I feel powerless, intimidated and depressed.

 

I was moved into temporary accommodation approx 4 years ago (May 2003). My wife, daughter (1) and I were moved from my parent’s house approximately 15 miles away into another borough where we had no family or friends for support.

 

The tenancy was in my wife’s name and I completed a housing benefit form in front of the rent officer who took it away. 5 months later my family was being evicted due to no form being received. I made a complaint at stage 1 which was upheld and apologies were made as my case was incorrectly closed and files were misplaced.

 

Approximately 9 months later from the beginning of the tenancy, I completed another assessment and this was acknowledged 1 year later!! However no rent had changed although my full time income was fluctuating and increasing year on year. I did not think anything of it, I was under a lot of pressure and my wife had just been diagnosed with a terminal illness.

 

After 2 ½ years into the tenancy I was asked to send further pay slips and further copies of tax credit awards which had already been sent in over the past months. After sending these into the housing office a letter was sent to my address requesting an overpayment of approx. £14k. I was furious and angry and frustrated. In the letter they state that due to not declaring my income until 2 ½ years later the benefit was reassessed and that I had been overpaid.

 

I sent in letters requesting an appeal and also a letter explaining all the information that I had sent in with dates and copies of correspondence. After my wife had died last year a friend spoke with someone at the council to inform them that I could not contact them at this time. A year later which was last week, I was sent 3 separate invoices that looked identical to the 14k but totalled approx £500. I sent in these invoices and asked for clarification.

 

They replied to my query by sending me the original 3 invoices for £14k.

 

I feel that I should not have to pay this debt as it was an error on their part and I made the council fully aware of my circumstances and so they should be held fully responsible for this overpayment.

 

My intentions are to ask for a complete breakdown and complain to the chief exec and then to the LA ombudsman.

 

I would be grateful for any advice!!

 

Thanks

 

Leo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome,

i think you will be best off sending a dpa sar to the council quoting your ref number and enclosing a £10 cheque.

They will have to by law give you all the details they have on you over the last 6 yrs.

I would also see a solicitor if you can, the first half hour is free, if you dont know one contact the CAB for one.

Good luck!

See if reading this thread helps?

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bailiffs/78406-housing-benefit-bailiffs.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act. It costs £10 in the form of a cheque or postal order, and entitles you to every single item of data that the council hold about you personally, including in your case a list of payments, any previous complaints/mistakes made, notes on your account written by the account operatives...you need to send it Special Delivery, to ensure that it's signed for. They have 40 calendar days to reply.

There's a link here to the basic one used for banks. You just need to change the details to suit your situation, and substitute the account numbers for your reference number.

Good luck; come back when you receive a response.

  • Haha 1

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The tenancy was under my late wife's name but also signed by myself. Documents used to come in my wifes name but now come in my name. Will this mean that they will only give me documents with my name on it?

 

leo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Leo,

 

Re: Housing benefit.

 

If the overpayment is substantial, and resulted from the local authority incorrectly assessing accurate information provided by a person, s/he could argue that, given her/his lack of understanding of how benefit is calculated, s/he could not reasonably have been expected to notice the error. A judicial review (R. v Liverpool City Council ex parte Griffiths, March 14 1990) of a local authority's attempt to recover an overpayment ruled that it was not recoverable because it was not reasonable to expect the claimant to work out her housing benefit entitlement. Such arguments may be strengthened by reference to the quality of the information provided by the local authority to the client about her/his benefit, and/or the client's difficulties in understanding the information.

 

As you had much going on in your life and the local authority were made aware of this, I as you would approach the local authority ombudsman regarding this. You have tried to deal directly with the L A but they have failed you. I would also complain to the L A using their complaints procedure quoting 'maladministration' and 'standards of service'. The L A will know what you mean when you use these terms. Also include as much evidence as possible including photocopies of letters etc if you have them. Looks like you have grounds for challenging this decision.

 

Good luck.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your advice! I have sent off letters today to the Chief executive of the LA demanding that the debt is written off due to maladministration of officers and negligence. Copies have also gone to local MP and departments. I have given 14 days for response and then i will pursue further with LA Ombudsman.

 

I have also sent off for the DPA!

 

I will get back to you with the outcome!

 

thanks again everyone!!

 

Leo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all

 

Progress so far!!

 

£10 returned to me for the DPA, been informed by letter not required for this service as they do not charge.

 

Dated 25/04/07 sent a final reminder for the overpayment of 11k (1 of 3 invoices totalling 14k) to be paid else legal action will be taken!!

 

Letter Dated 26/04/07 from Office of Chief Executive who replied that reply will be given within 15 days and passed onto stage 2 of complaints procedure.

 

Dated 26/04/07 letter informing me that a reply will be given by 17th May and being dealt with at stage 1 of complaints by senior officer.

 

Abit confused as to what is going on but seems that there is no communication between departments as decisions are being made that seem inconsistent and letters are being sent out without knowledge of what is going on with my case. I have already made a complaint at stage 1 although i could not respond to their letter at the time. Is my first complaint void due to no response??

 

DO I need to contact overpayments team and tell them or should they not know that a complaint is being dealt with??

 

Leo

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should know, but it might be worthwhile phoning them anyway - you can't always rely on the left hand knowing what the right is doing under these circumstances.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...