Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

'Administration' Charge


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6184 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks

 

Does the same apply to insurance companies as to banks with regard to unlawful charges? I mean, I had a direct debit on an insurance premium unpaid because of insufficient funds but this time it wasn't the bank that levied the unlawful charge but the insurance company are trying to charge a £30 'administration charge' and are threatening to withdraw cover and/or demand the whole outstanding year's premium if the monthly charge plus the £30 aren't paid. Anybody got any experience of this and have I got any comeback if they cancel the policy or get on their high horse in any other way? Cheers

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading down the list it looks as though this is a fairly common thing. I have no intention of paying the admin charge as they call it and I shall be sending them the owed premium minus the charge. If they then try to cancel the policy or demand the full amount I will require them to provide a full breakdown and they can take me to court if they wish but I will first enlighten them that they will have to explain to the Court precisely what ther charge was for and their justification for any action they might take.

 

The company is Close Premium Finance, by the way

Link to post
Share on other sites

How's this:-

'With reference to your letter of xxxxxxxx please find enclosed my cheque for £xx.xx, being the missed premium on the above account. Your ‘administration charge’ of £30 is a profit-making, unlawful charge and will not be paid unless you can provide me with a true, believable breakdown of how this charge was arrived at.

Any attempt to cancel this agreement as a result of non-payment of your charge will be regarded as retaliatory and will be challenged in Court unless, again, you can prove to me that the charge is justifiable.

I hope we will not have to resort to legal action over this matter. The missed premium was a genuine error and I would like to continue paying future premiums as normal but will not be intimidated, by threats of cancellation, legal action or otherwise, into paying unlawful, unenforceable charges. I hope you will agree that it will be beneficial to both parties if this matter is resolved immediately by your acceptance of my payment and cancellation of your charge.'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds reasonable to me.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

How did you get on with this? I signed on tonight specifically to ask the same question about Close Premium and wondering whether indeed these 'charges' can be claimed back. I owe them another one now so think i'll use your template letter and see what happens.

Thanks!

Let me know how you get on....

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is only just starting so I haven't sent the letter off yet. They've 'given me' until 1st of May so I'm sending the cheque (minus the thirty quid) next week. I'll post the result as soon as I know anything. I'm beginning to enjoy all this stuff...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am claiming refund penalty charges from Close Premium Finance.

The main point in reclaiming charges is whether they are unlawful,and not who is imposing the charges.

When I made my initial inquiry to Close Premium Finance they said "Oh that only applies to banks and credit cards not us,bye".

I'm at the LBA stage at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you claim administration charges back? Like bank charges.

I missed A payment and they have been charging me £20 each time for administration charge they have debited out of my account.And if i can claim them back Could someone tell me where i can find a template to print off. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

We sent them the month's premium (which they cashed) with the letter and a request for a new direct debit mandate so that no more payments would be missed. Heard nothing until today when a letter arrived telling us that as we hadn't paid the £57 etc they would be excercising their right to close the account a demand full payment. We haven't defaulted - all payments have been made within the month they were due. The only thing we've refused to do is pay the rip-off charge. They have ignored our request for a new dd mandate. Any thoughts anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I sent my LBA to Close last week and have given them 7 days before I start my MCOL which I will at the end of the week.

Interestingly, for the last payment I missed they've sent me a letter telling me to pay up within so long and that as I've defaulted on the DD I will be charged £30 for this, so instead of owing them £20.47 I now owe them £20.47 (er hello) which includes the £30 apparently. Just how stupid are they?? that's fine, I have no problem paying the £20.47 as that's just what I owe. Also, trying to pay on their automated line which is having some technical problems and asking people to call back another day!!

unbelievable. I'm changing my insurance because of this.

pinky :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

They weren't too helpful. Ignored my letter and are now threatening to close the account despite the fact that I haven't actually defaulted because paid the premium albeit a week or so late. All I'm doing is refusing to pay the £30 charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody like to comment on the following before I send it off? I'm also wondering whether I should pay the full premium for the year to get them off my back and then report them for being knobs?

 

'I am in receipt of your letter regarding the above account.

I see that you have chosen to completely ignore everything I said in my letter to you in which I apologised for the initial missed payment and requested a new direct debit mandate so that future payments could be made on time. The only aspect which you appear to have taken the slightest notice of whatever is the cheque I enclosed which I see has been presented and cleared.

First payment therefore made within the month it was due - not defaulted.

Second payment would have been made if you had seen fit to send a dd mandate.

Your decision to terminate is seen as retaliatory because I did not pay the unlawful charge. The fact that you categorically state that £57.61 ‘is the amount owing to Close Bothers Limited’ is both untrue and misleading. Even allowing for the fact that this month’s payment (which I have offered to pay by dd) has become due, the £30 on top is unlawful and will not be paid under any circumstances.

I enclose a further cheque for this month’s payment (27.61). This will again bring the account up to date.

I will be speaking to my insurers regarding this and if I find my insurance has been affected because of this I will be reporting the matter to …….. and taking the matter further with regard to legal action.

  • There has been no default on this account
  • Payments have been made within the month they became due
  • Your £30 ‘administration charge’ is a profit-making rip-off
  • You have ignored my request for a direct debit mandate to set up a new monthly payment

Provided you accept the enclosed payment, restart the account and forward a direct debit mandate so that normal payments can be made I will overlook your misguided attempt to impose an unlawful charge. However, any moves to retaliate by closing the account, placing adverse entries on my credit record and so on will result in reports and complaints to every relevant authority.

Please can we settle this matter amicably and without further hassle in order that we can all get on with our lives without having to spend time and effort arguing over petty trivia?

Thank you

Yours faithfully...'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having just read the letter from Close again it goes:-

 

'Blah blah blether, rabbit etc.......

 

You have failed to make payment in time and you therefore continue to be in breach of the Agreement.

 

In accordance with our rights under clause 7 of the Agreement, we have decided with immediate effect to terminate the Agreement and may enforce our security by cancelling your insurance policy as set out in the attached schedule and applying any refund of premium in or towards satisfaction of your obligations under the Agreement'

 

Well, quite apart from any charges of retaliation that sounds to me like they're just going to cancel the insurance. No talk of chasing me for the year's premium so maybe I'll just say well, get on with it then and look for another insurer? If they come on to me for the balance later I'll just tell them to go away, refuse to acknowledge the debt and present the letters offering and enclosing payment in the event they try to sue me.

 

Any thoughts, anyone, on either course of action?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am claiming refund penalty charges from Close Premium Finance.

The main point in reclaiming charges is whether they are unlawful,and not who is imposing the charges.

When I made my initial inquiry to Close Premium Finance they said "Oh that only applies to banks and credit cards not us,bye".

I'm at the LBA stage at the moment.

 

Have you got an address for close premium?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...