Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi dx It's with Step Change. Yes that is the balance outstanding plus interest.
    • Hi All, I don't want to keep asking unnecessary and daft questions but as I read up on on stuff to prepare my defence and tthink about my witness statement, I am perusing the following: The BPA Code of practice states under 13. Consideration and Grace Periods: 13.1 The driver must have the chance to consider the Terms and Conditions before entering into the ‘parking contract’ with you. If, having had that opportunity, the driver decides not to park but chooses to leave the car park, you must provide them with a reasonable consideration period to leave, before the driver can be bound by your parking contract. The amount of time in these instances will vary dependant on site size and type but it must be a minimum of 5 minutes. 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place.   Let's say a motorist spends a minimum of 5 minutes to decide, then decides to park, that 5 minutes now doesn't apply? That doesn't make sense to me. So now that a motorist has parked after consideration, thus commencing the parking period, the decision time doesn't apply and parking time commenced when? .... on entry to the car park? This, as far as I can see is not stated in the [Withdrawn] Government document which says: The Code also makes clear that the consideration period ends at the point when the driver has parked and is therefore considered to have accepted the terms and conditions, which could be within the five-minute allowance. Doesn't say anything about it not applying if a parking event takes place.   [Withdrawn] Private Parking Code of Practice: explanatory document – how was it developed and what will it change? - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK So, according to the BPA, if a motorist inadvertently overstayed by 12 minutes for example, they have the 10 minute grace period but because they decided to park, they don't have the 5 minute consideration period because they decided to park and have overstayed by 2 minutes? Sorry if there's something I'm missing here.  
    • there are several threads here already whereby the judge in such cases only made an order to pay the required sum, the registering of a criminal record is at their discretion or not. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS vague `CHG to A/C' entries?


Pipski
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6210 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well, I've got all my statements, I've added up the totals, and I'm ready to make my claim. However, I'm not sure how much it should be!

 

I've got x amount of card misuse fees that I can claim. They seem pretty straightforward (though when you start adding them up, it's astonishing how much they come to!) However, I've got about the same amount in £10 `CHG to ddmmm A/C ********' (where ddmmm is the date and asterisks are the account number). These crop up very regularly from the opening of the account, then mysteriously stop (though they stop at about the time when I left university, became more solvent, and stopped going over my limit so often!). There doesn't seem to be any particular pattern to the dates on which they occur, or the balance on the dates which they are applied.

 

There's also one, but only one, `CHG to ddmmm A/C ********' for £32.55. The rest are all £10. There's not really enough information in that format to tell me what kind of penalty was being applied here though. Does anyone know if it's claimable? The kicker is, without these additional £10 charges, the total is going to be below any kind of level at which the bank would kick up a fuss, but with them it's going to be over the sort of amount where they'll start doing their own sums, so I want to get it right.

 

If in doubt, I guess I'll claim and let them sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a student overdraft, so I guess they could be charges for the account, but then I'd expect them to be more consistent in terms of dates etc. ... I'll try ringing them. I mean, you're right - they ought to know! Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pipski,

 

I spent ages trying to work this out, I too had a student royalties account. I've put them in because when I looked into it they were only applied on the months where I had gone over my overdraft. I looked on the Royal Bank of Scotland website and the charge for unauthorised borrowing on a student royalties account is £10. Also I do know that on the Student royalties account they can only charge you £10 max in a month no matter how many times or days you are overdrawn. The charges look regular because they are taken out at the same time each month but they cant be legitimate account fees unless they are applied every single month, and you're saying yours weren't applied every month so I'd imagine they're charges. As far as I know there aren't any monthly fees on the student account anyway. So it makes sense that they are charges for unauthorised borrowing which you can definitely claim for.

 

Kat

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know there aren't any monthly fees on the student account anyway.

Isn't there such thing as a Student Royalties account that carries a monthly charge? I did read on another thread just now someone referring to a monthly charge on the SR account. They could have been misinformed tho?

 

Do agree with you though, as they're infrequent the certainly aren't an account fee. Just curious...

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have a student royalties account. I don't pay any montly charges, but I am charged £10, plus a small amount of interest, each time I go over the free student overdraft limit.

The £10/interest charge is deducted the following month, and I usually get a letter entitled CHG to A/C, with my statements to inform me of the charges.

I recently claimed all these £10 charges back. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never paid any monthly charges on my student or graduate royalties accounts. I had a look on the Rbos Personal finance section of the website and they only appear to charge £6 for a Royalties, £12 for a Royalties Gold and £15 for a Royalties Premier. In the info about the Student Royalties there's no mention of charges.

 

Perhaps the person you're referring to T4FF had the £10 unauthorsied borrowing charge so regularly that they thought it was an account fee because that's what I thought at first! Rbos call their unauthorised overdraft charge a Maintenance charge when they write to you which is very misleading. Also, in all other accounts the "Maintenance" charge for going over your overdraft is £28 but it's only £10 on the student royalties and R21 accounts, which is maybe why it could get confused with a monthly service charge?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps the person you're referring to T4FF had the £10 unauthorsied borrowing charge so regularly that they thought it was an account fee because that's what I thought at first!

 

Highly likely this is what has happened!!

 

Cheers for the info kitty.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...