Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Whats going on here??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6222 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Made a claim against RBS for £852 + interest for charges, they replied with offer for £752 which I have turned down. Have just checked my account online as I received notification of two further charges of £29 on the 5th April, but also on the 5th a deposit of £752 (charges refund) which brought me well within the limit. So £58 worth of charges applied when I wasn't overdrawn - on money I never agreed to!

Capitalism is the legitimate racket

of the ruling class.

Al Capone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to them again saying that you have already rejected their offer and instruct them to take the money out immediately. Ensure taking the money out doesn't send you overdrawn again!!!

 

Are you saying the charge was being applied on the 5th or the offence was made on the 5th? Your charges are applied in arrears, basically you are charged for last month's "offences" this month. So if the charges were being applied on the 5th of this month it doesn't matter if you were in credit this month, the charges are relating to you being overdrawn or missing direct debits or whatever LAST month.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a Virgin One Account(RBS) and both offenses (returned d/d) were on the 5th and charges are always applied the same day with the One Account , but cannot believe they have still applied them even though they have put the £752.00 charges refund back in on the 5th.

Have just sent the good lady to pay some funds in before I ring them up. They have also threatened on the offer letter that they will take away the banking facility on this account if I don't accept their T&C in future, can they do this considering this is a mortgage agreement?

Capitalism is the legitimate racket

of the ruling class.

Al Capone

Link to post
Share on other sites

The banks run a sweep of the system first thing in the morning to see what direct debits et al can be paid on that day and then bounce them. Any funds that are due on the account appear later in the day and therefore the direct debits have already been returned unpaid.

 

Quite often I've rung banks about this. Some (RBS in particular), providing that I tell them ON THE DAY OF THE DD that there are funds going in to cover a DD, manually force the payment through. Other banks are less helpful and state that once the automated system has bounced the payment there is no way to reverse it even if there is money in the account. I have had a blazing row in the middle of Nationwide about that :D

 

It's unethical how they do it but is obviously geared in a way that they can make the maximum profit from the situation ie you have no opportunity to correct your error on the day it happens.

 

It sucks if you ask me.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They get to keep funds in limbo and earn quite a pretty penny on all the money that is floating around for a few hours before it's credited to recipients account.....

 

I love banks, there's a streak of vampirism in all of them. Parasites! lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...