Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
    • We both sent our completed N181 form to the court and claimants solicitors. We haven't received anything from the solicitors yet but perhaps we will today. How are directions agreed ? Does the claimant file proposed directions with their Directions Questionnaire ? I will update once anything is received from the solicitors.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Building Insurance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6232 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have only found out today that my buildings insurance company are turning down my claim, due to the length of time since the accidents happened, I made the claim on the 5th Jan 2007 and sent this letter on the 27th Feb to support the estimates. I have asked for a copy of the policy as I do not have one, due to the building insurance being looked after by factoring agents, is there a time limit to when you can make a claim?

 

 

This is the letter I sent to the insurance company:

 

Dear Mr xxxx,

 

REF: Water damage to property

 

Following on from our telephone conversation on the 23rd February 2007 please will you accept this statement for my insurance claim.

 

Bathroom damage

 

Around about June 2006 a heavy perfume bottle fell from shelving in the bathroom into my WC pan, this caused a chip to the top of the pan, which was not of much concern other than cosmetic damage. In December 2006, one of my children told me that they thought the pan had moved. On checking the WC area, I could feel the carpet was damp at the base of the WC. When I pulled back the carpet the floor area was wet and the WC had sunk into the floor slightly, I saw that there was a hairline crack down the WC pan from the chip to just under the waterline. The back wall tiles had become loose due to the movement of the WC and had caused the fitting between the WC and the outlet pipe to leak. The base of the pan is located over a joist under the floor and this I think stopped the pan from falling through the floor. This is now of primary concern. The bathroom floor is now very unstable, and I am very concerned about physical injury being incurred by myself or a member of my family.

 

Kitchen/Living Room damage

 

In October 2006, I contacted xxxxxxxxxxx, to report a damp patch on the outside of my building above my kitchen window and down the side of my house wall between the kitchen and living room. I was informed that someone from xxxxxxxx would come out to examine the wall. (The girl who took my call, I think was called xxxxx?). I reported this to xxxxxx as they are responsible for the factoring and maintenance of the building.

 

 

 

 

There was no evidence of flowing water but I was aware of a hole in the wall, accommodating the overflow pipe above my kitchen window and the dampness appeared to be coming from there. I do not know if anyone came to look at the wall. In November 2006, I was decorating my living room where I discovered a damp patch in the corner of the room above the skirting board, this was not seen before, due to a cabinet in that corner. Initially I did not connect the dampness to the outside until later in December, I discovered loose and damp wallpaper above my kitchen window, I found it difficult to close my kitchen window, on investigation I could see a very slow drip falling outside my kitchen window, this I discovered had also been seeping in through the wall.

 

I contacted xxxxxxxxxxx to speak to Mrs xxxxxx, who is responsible for our property, she was not available, and therefore I left a message on her answer machine. Mrs xxxxx had not been in touch, I assume due to Xmas and New Year so I contacted xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to report the flooding damage to my living room/kitchen and bathroom, on this occasion, I was informed I should make a claim on the buildings insurance.

 

xxxxxx then contacted our neighbors that live directly above us. They instructed a plumber to come and check the overflow pipe, and the ball cock in their main water tank was replaced.

 

We then arranged for the damage to be assessed by professionals in order to gain two estimates for repair of the damage. These have been sent to yourselves in respect of these claims.

 

Please find attached photographs to substantiate these claims. We welcome any inspection instructed by you.

06th April 2006 Statements requested for last 6 yrs:

Bank of Scotland: Current account Breaching DPA

Royal Bank of Scotland: Style Breaching DPA

Capital One: Mastercard Request for £499.23 on the 17th April. £40 refunded to account on 26th April. Small claim hearing 27th June. Full refund and interest 24th May.

Coop: Crashed and burned into giving in Full and final offered 16 days after LBA ;)

 

Thats enough just now, more to come though

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have posted 2 different water damage claims here.

 

Probably best to have separated them into 2 individual posts to avoid any confusion. Have they turned down both claims?

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, didn't make that clear in the original post. Yes it was two separate claims, both turned down:mad:

06th April 2006 Statements requested for last 6 yrs:

Bank of Scotland: Current account Breaching DPA

Royal Bank of Scotland: Style Breaching DPA

Capital One: Mastercard Request for £499.23 on the 17th April. £40 refunded to account on 26th April. Small claim hearing 27th June. Full refund and interest 24th May.

Coop: Crashed and burned into giving in Full and final offered 16 days after LBA ;)

 

Thats enough just now, more to come though

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...