Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DVLA tax penalty


lee2006
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6130 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I've just received a letter from the dvla telling me i have to pay £40 as i didnt tax my quad.

 

The thing is, i sold the quad on ebay in december, the buyer and myself filled out the log book and put it in en envelope and he said he'd post it on his way home for me. I don't know if he did or if its lost in the post.

 

Any idea on what stance the DVLA will take on this as i really cant afford to pay £40 for something thats not my fault.

 

Thanks for any help you can give me.

 

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the buyer does with his form doesn't affect your liability to fill in YOUR counterfoil and send it to DVLA. If you've relied on him to return your section of the V5, you might have saved 19p on a stamp, but left yourself liable. You could try responding to the DVLA by saying that the Quad was sold and YOUR section of the V5 returned on XX/XX/XX. End by saying the vehicle was purchased by.... and give the details if you have them, they MAY accept this and let you off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be fine, I bought a car and got done running a red light before ownership had been transfered over (yes I know naughty me). The original owner just sent back the nip stating he was no longer the owner and that I was. Of course you may have sent your part back and it got lost in the post...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi, same thing happened to me. I part-exchanged my car in Oct 04 and recieved a fine for non-payment of road tax in Feb 05 when I was not the legal owner of the car. I only found out this year when I did a credit check and found I had a ccj from the DVLA. I put in a defence with the courts and had the ccj put aside by the judge. The DVLA though still expect me to pay the £100 fine (was originally £40) and I am now having to take the DVLA to the small claims court to dispute the fine (again).

 

If I was you I would certainly dispute it with the DVLA if you have any success with them though is another matter. We should question their ability to move the goal posts to suit their own needs and not those who are innocently caught up through no fault of their own. Apparently it's ok for them to not be responsible for tax discs sent via the post but, YOU are responsible if your form is not received via the post?? Double standards. If you do dispute it put it in writing. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an observation (from what I've learned so far in this Continuous Registration farrago). Being the 'legal owner' is not and has never been an issue. You need to be the 'Registered Keeper', no more no less.

 

When you part-exchanged your car, you did complete the Yellow (Part 9) section of the V5? If you didn't, then the fine would be confirmed by the courts as you had not properly discharged your obligation. If you simply handed over the V5 to the dealer, their lack of responsibility in taking care of this on your behalf should be made an issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...