Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
    • depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs. on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info. as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should     
    • Still have to submit a statement either system....if they fail they can only give verbal because they failed to file and serve.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

TheDean Vs RBS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6196 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Let me tell you where we are with my claim. I have recieved the last 6yrs worth of statements and have have calculated all this up to just under £1k which is a nice small amount in comparison to some of them claims on here :)

The first question is - Interest! I have seen many people adding 8% interest onto their claims - Am I able to do this, and if so how and why? I have also seen higher rates of interest knocking around and people using them - Any ideas?

Thank you all in advance,

 

TheDean

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm no expert - but this is how I understand it.

 

In your prelim letter - the only interest you can claim is any interest the bank charged YOU when the charges sent you overdrawn. The spreadsheet works all this out for you.

 

However....

 

You can TRY and claim contractual interest (ci) which some people are doing. This in effect is charging the bank interest because they've held your money for so long, just as the bank charge YOU interest when you have THEIR money (i.e. when you go overdrawn). These people usually try and charge the same rate in interest that the bank charge us for going OD, usually around 29%! As an example, I'm claiming back approx £4k in charges, however if I add on CI it nearly doubles!!!! But it seems if people try for CI the banks are fighting it and some are ending up going to court.

 

Last but not least - if you don't claim CI, but you get no joy from your prelim and LBA letters, you CAN then add on 8% interest when you file your claim at court. (the spreadsheet does this for you also).

 

Hope that helps, and if I'm wrong someone please point it out.

Request for statements sent 1/2/07

 

Statements received 10/02/07

 

Prelim emailed and posted 15/02/07

Prelim email received 15/02/2007

Prelim letter signed for 16/02/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds good to me Essix, although I'm pretty sure that claims with CI have been seetled prior to going to court

Possibly so...

 

However, and this is what stopped me from claiming CI, it seems the banks DO fight for it (in some instances) and personally it's not something I'd feel comfortable fighting for. Charges yes - I'll fight (believe me) but CI is a different ball game.

Request for statements sent 1/2/07

 

Statements received 10/02/07

 

Prelim emailed and posted 15/02/07

Prelim email received 15/02/2007

Prelim letter signed for 16/02/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Dean, just catching up after your post in my thread ;)

 

I have to echo Essix's comments....you can guarantee that the bank won't settle for CI lightly and contrary to what you said, I'd be surprised if you found any (well ok, many) claims that have been settled WITH CI without filing.

 

It may be that you have got your interests confused? Remember as EB has said, there are 3 types of interest - interest charged monthly on your statements, the statuatory 8% interest added to your claim once you have filed a court claim and finally contractual interest.

 

Be warned, just because CI double EB's claim, it is not as easy as simply decided to "go for" contractual interest. It requires a lot of reading, learning what you are claiming for, why you are claiming, why you are entitled to it, as you will likely require to prove it in court....

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks T4ff,

 

Think I'll stay clear of the 8% interest thing then.....To be fair - £1K is a good enough amount for me already :)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right,

 

Got my spreadsheet all done and calculated the amounts (looks to be just over £900). Now, I've sent my claim through e-mail this morning to good Old Tommy! Using the Prelim. letter and excel document containing charges.

 

Has anyone else gone through e-mail before?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did with my first claim and most of my second one. Was nice because I included a read reciept with them.

 

Yeah - I spoke to Tommy today. I was expecting an old man, but he sounds quite young! I asked him if he recieved my e-mail, he confirmed he had, and I also asked him if he could reply to me with that effect - He is yet to do that, but I think verbal confirmation is good enough for now. Obvously, if he misses the 14 day deadline then I can take it further - But I'm happy with it now.

 

I must say - he did sound quite stressed over the phone - So everyone be nice to him - It's not his fault after all! :)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just so everyone knows - He did confirm recipt of my original email after I asked him politely through another e-mail and advised me he would get back to me once the team had look at it.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well,

 

Just to keep people updated who were interested - There is no update :-( ! The first 14 day deadline is on Thursday, so if they miss that they have another 14 days before i file a court claim which I certainly will be doing.

Just out of interest - When using e-mail to claim, did people recieve e-mail's back or letters to their home address?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all,

 

Ok - So RBS have not responded to me as yet, so tomorrow I will be sending my LBA to Tommy via e-mail, I am however wanting to claim the 8% interest. Does anyone have a letter that they have previously submitted which includes this that i could steal?

 

Cheers

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dean- I am also at the same stage as you although I posted my prelim by recorded, tomorrow I shall be posting off my LBA. You will read in others threads that the 8% is only added when you file at court, you should look at T4FF postings he seems to give good advice.

05/03/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) handed in at branch

Found missing statements at home !!!!

08/03/07 Prelim+ schedule posted rec del

22/03/07 :mad: No reply to prelim LBA posted rec del

05/04/07 :mad: 14 days and no reply to LBA, sent e-mail

27/04/07 :D Offered FULL SETTLEMENT £3375

03/05/07 Cash in bank account :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - Sent my LBA by e-mail to Tommy this morning and have both a recieved and read recipt :-) .

 

Tommy McLean

Manager, Customer Relations

Ground Floor

The Forthstone

56 South Gyle Crescent

Edinburgh (Depot Code 045)

 

 

22/03/06

 

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Dear Mr McLean,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: ********

 

 

I am very disappointed that you have failed to respond to my e-mail of the 08/03/06.

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

I calculate that you have taken £****** from me in total.

I am again enclosing a copy of the schedule of the charges which I am claiming. I have already sent you a copy of this in my original email of the 08/03/06.

 

 

 

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest and my costs, without further notice.

 

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the below e-mail from Tommy

 

Sorry, Mr 'TheDean'

 

We don't normally acknowledge receipt of these claims due to the number we

receive.

 

Your case is being looked at by the team responsible for these claims.

 

Tommy McLean

 

Any ideas of the response I should send?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was thinking of saying something along the lines of...

 

Mr McLean,

I am disappointed by the below e-mail you have sent me. Regardless of how many claims you may have to deal with you must always acknowledge receipt of them. I understand the kind of pressure your team must be under due to a great deal of recent media coverage. Interestingly you did originally acknowledge the claim on the 8/3/07. Please find the e-mail attached to confirm this.

Please be aware that my deadlines submitted previously will still stand and court action will be taken if a full offer is not forthcoming that time.

Is this Ok?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I send the above and he comes back with the below...

 

If we do not formally respond to your claim within a time that you deem acceptable, then it is absolutely your prerogative to progress it through whichever means you see fit.

Our regulator allows us 56 days to respond to complaints, though I know that a number of the websites supporting customers making claims suggest that claimants should drive their own timetable and escalate matters more quickly. As I said, that is your prerogative.

 

Tommy McLean

 

Ideas to respond?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mumofthreeboys
Ideas to respond?

 

Yes, how about wait until the 14 days are up and sue.

 

You are really wasting your time entering into a debate with him about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're probably right Mum - However.....

 

Sent him the below:

 

Mr. McLean,

 

Irrespective of regulator suggestions, a month to repay unlawful charges is more than enough time, and for this reason I will be sticking with my deadlines. I'm sure you would agree with me that it is in the banks best interest to shut the door on this claim as soon as possible. If a court claim is filed by me a full offer at that stage would be rejected and I would move to claim court costs, personal costs and interest at a rate of 8%. In light of this, I have calculated that my claim would increase by a minimum of two thirds if a court claim is to be filed.

In any respect, I will not be entering into an e-mail debate with you in connection with the claim itself. Unless a full offer is received by April 5th I shall proceed with taking the bank to court.

Regards,

 

The Dean

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang in their Dean - just over 2 weeks after sending the LBA, I got a full refund...

 

Not long now...

Request for statements sent 1/2/07

 

Statements received 10/02/07

 

Prelim emailed and posted 15/02/07

Prelim email received 15/02/2007

Prelim letter signed for 16/02/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mumofthreeboys
If a court claim is filed by me a full offer at that stage would be rejected and I would move to claim court costs, personal costs and interest at a rate of 8%.

 

If they offer you exactly what you have claimed for in your POC's you are obliged to accept the offer. On what basis would you be proceeding with your claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they offer you exactly what you have claimed for in your POC's you are obliged to accept the offer. On what basis would you be proceeding with your claim?

 

Well if I actually start court preceedings - more time, effort and money would be required for me to progress this through the small claims track.

 

In any rate - He sent me the below:

 

As I have said throughout, it is absolutely your prerogative to do what you see as right for you.

I flagged only that our regulator works to a 56-day timescale and, in my opinion, the regulator is more likely to be aware of how long 'a reasonable time' is to handle a complaint/claim. I accept that your opinion is that he is not.

Tommy McLean

 

Which regulator is Tommy reffering to? I would be interesting in contacting them to see what they have to say.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang in their Dean - just over 2 weeks after sending the LBA, I got a full refund...

 

Not long now...

 

 

Thanks Essix.....:)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

TheDean Vs Telewest - 27/10 SB's big letter sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any respect, I will not be entering into an e-mail debate with you in connection with the claim itself.

Bit late for that isn't it? :D

 

I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to achieve? Got to agree with MOTB, what benefit does this provide? If you don't hear from them, take it to the next stage, if you don't hear from them again, file a court claim, it's as simple as that.

 

You aren't achieving anything by doing this.

 

I believe the regulatory body is the Financial Ombudsmen who state that a bank must respond to a complaint within 8 weeks. Why would you want to speak to them?

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...