Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bankers Draft Conundrum


cakey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6556 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What is a bankers draft and why would you pay for one?

 

I had a Natwest Bankers draft today (a win from my case against them) so for fun went into natwest to pay it into my account and asked how long it would take to clear as it was the same bank and a bankers draft... the answer? 5 working days.

 

So exactly why would you pay £21 or so for a bankers draft?

Do you have a website? Add the following code to add a link to The Consumer Action Group:

 

<a href="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk"><b><font color="#FF0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Consumer Action Group</font></b></a> - <font color="#FF9900" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Reclaim your rights as a consumer and reclaim your unfair bank charges! Free site with letter templates and helpful forum.</font>

 

_____________________________________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

A personal cheque is a cheque drawn on a personal account. A bank draft is a cheque

drawn on the bank's account. To get one, you have to give them cleared funds first. Ie if you want a cheque from them for £1000, you must give them £1000-plus

their charge- I must say that £21 is a bit excessive- sure it's not £12?

So the cheque is virtually guaranteed not to bounce, unlike a personal cheque where you take pot luck. The banks say they are as good as cash. They are not.

They can be stopped just like a personal cheque-though you usually need a good reason. You have lost the draft, or you have a serious dispute with the person you gave the cheque to, for example. Drafts can also be forged and I know of instances where blank drafts have been stolen from a branch and then filled in for large amounts by the thief.

Why use them? Safety for one thing. Drafts are usually for fairly large amounts

[buying a car as an example]. If you get mugged with cash on you, you lose your cash:with a draft all you do is stop the cheque and get a replacement. Also much

easier to send it through the post than cash where the recipient will not accept a

personal cheque. It's a shame that just about the only bank that has a cheque

guarantee card for £1000 is the United bank of Kuwait.

 

Also if you accept a draft from someone, once you have exchanged your goods for it, do not let that person have access to the draft. There have been instances

where once they have your goods, they snatch the draft and tear it up then

claim they lost it and get their money back from the bank.

 

PS the reason that it takes 5 days to clear is that as it is still a cheque, it has to go through the same process as a

personal cheque [the bank clearing system]for it to be paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, i apologise for posting again, but here goes.

 

at the halifax where i work, and deal with drafts all the time.

 

we can stop them, but only on reciept of written authourity from the payee on the draft, that is the only way we can do it, and get the customer to sign to accept that is the only way it will be stopped.

 

we can pay a halifax draft into a halifax account as cleared funds, slighty different procedures if it is the drawing branch, or another one, but end result is the funds available straight away.

 

hope that helps in any way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are welcome to post whenever you want Howard.

I am surprised in a way that the Halifax treats drafts drawn on themselves as cleared funds straight away. After all the draft itself will not be cleared for payment

until 3 days later when it arrives at Head Office. There it will be checked for

authenticity and that it has not been stopped, nor any other reason for non-payment.

Compared to Nat West, the Halifax is comparatively new to having received banking status and so may not have been heavily stung by adopting this practice commendable though it may be. It remains to be seen if they will be forced to change in the future, but they do run a risk as it stands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone I know was scammed via a fake bankers draft. (classic nigerian [problem], they sent a bankers draft for larger than the sale amount, then asked my friend to send them the balance minus an amount for her trouble - my friend assumed that as the bankers draft had cleared into her account it was fine and the money was safe) The bank accepted it when it was paid in, cleared it and my friend sent the money. A few days later my friend happened to mention it to me, I realised what was going on and told her to phone the bank immediately. They said 'yes there are scams like this, we'll look into it'. 2 weeks later my friend received a letter informing them that it was fake. It wasn't even a very good fake (my friend realised when she saw it again how bad it was, but she assumed as the bank accepted it that they must have checked it and it was fine)

 

Result - the bank took the money back with no liability to themselves whatsover. The police did sod all.

 

I certainly wouldn't accept a bankers draft for large amounts such as a car. The rules about clearing must have changed, as then (last year) the bank had an obligation to make the funds available within 48hrs, what they don't tell you and what very few people seem to be aware of is that it can bounce and they will take the money back 2 weeks later.

 

I know my friend went to the FSA and CA, but never got a penny back. I think the amount was around £900.

Bank of Scotland: Claiming £699.47, SETTLED IN FULL at moneyclaim stage

Sisters NatWest - Claiming £1056 - SETTLED at AQ stage

Natwest CC - Claiming £804, SETTLED IN FULL at LBA stage

GF Natwest - claiming £749.33, moneyclaim filed - SETTLED IN FULL 04/08

MBNA: Claiming £150 - SETTLED IN FULL at LBA stage

HSBC: £1014 - SETTLED at LBA stage + pending charges removed

Sisters HSBC - £300 - SETTLED IN FULL at prelim stage

Yorkshire bank - claiming £496.68 - SETTLED IN FULL at court date stage.

Capital One - claiming £605.54 -SETTLED IN FULL

 

 

 

DON'T FORGET TO DONATE!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are welcome to post whenever you want Howard.

I am surprised in a way that the Halifax treats drafts drawn on themselves as cleared funds straight away. After all the draft itself will not be cleared for payment

until 3 days later when it arrives at Head Office. There it will be checked for

authenticity and that it has not been stopped, nor any other reason for non-payment.

Compared to Nat West, the Halifax is comparatively new to having received banking status and so may not have been heavily stung by adopting this practice commendable though it may be. It remains to be seen if they will be forced to change in the future, but they do run a risk as it stands.

we do quite a few checks when it is presented, even when it is at the dsame branch it is drawn, anything doesn't add up, it goes straight into the normal clearing system, and an investigation is started at the same time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Do you have a website? Add the following code to add a link to The Consumer Action Group:

 

<a href="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk"><b><font color="#FF0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Consumer Action Group</font></b></a> - <font color="#FF9900" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Reclaim your rights as a consumer and reclaim your unfair bank charges! Free site with letter templates and helpful forum.</font>

 

_____________________________________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6556 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...