Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBOS initial offer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6211 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I'm totally new to this and am looking for some help with my claim against the Royal Bank of Scotland. I sent them a letter on the 13th Feb asking for £480.71 in bank charges to be refunded to me. I used the letter from Martin Lewis's website, moneysavingexpert.com. I got a reply yesterday from Sandy Watt (whom I see is becoming a minor celebrity on this website...is it a man or a woman?? Who knows!!), offering me £402, which is the amount of charges, but does not include the interest that I had added on. I'm not sure what to do now, wether to take this amount or hold out for the other £80.

 

I just got my bank statement this morning, and because they took £126 worth of charges from my account in February alone they pushed me over my overdraft limit again, so I'm going to be charged another £28 in March. I'm tempted to add this on as well!!

 

Any advice from anyone? My husband thinks I should just take the £402 and run as I got it so easily. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Until you actually file a claim in the courts, you are not entitled to claim interest. The bank have got it right, just offering you the charges back.

 

Sadly, you cannot "hold out for the other £80" as it is not actually owed.

 

Does the £402 include the £126 from February too?

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I don't think you have a choice. You have not yet issued a claim and so therefore are not entitled to any interest and if you decided to issue a claim now, in light of the fact that you have been offered full settlement of all that you are entitled too, I wonder on what basis you would be making that claim?

 

The charge on March 16th has not yet been levied and so you cannot take that into account until it has been, but certainly you should claim that back too, unless you can have them cancel it first, which you may be able to do.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, would it be best then, to send back the acceptance letter and attach a letter asking them to cancel the charges due on 16th March, or to call my branch do you think? I swear they know me in there and dread talking to me on the phone, so it may not be effective. Also I'm sure they'll try and fob me off. Perhaps I should just wait till they add the charges before doing anything, but that may well push me over my limit again, there's very little left in the account!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you act quickly you will receive a payment of £402 shortly!

 

Regarding the £28 charge, it depends on how confident you feel and who you get to speak too as to whether it is worthwhile calling them and only one of those factors you can control.

 

I would be inclinded to accept the return of the £402 without delay and to write to them about the £28 they are planning to levy on March 16th - if nothing else it will be most entertaining to see the reply where they attempt to explain that they can repay you £402 but not £38...

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your help, I'll send the form back asap with a letter regarding the £28 pending. I'm so pleased I did this, everyone should!

 

I can't wait to see what they say in response now! Will let you know!

 

Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a reply yesterday from Sandy Watt (whom I see is becoming a minor celebrity on this website...is it a man or a woman?? Who knows!!)

 

I know she is female - had to phone them last week and spoke to her - was gonna ask her for her autograph cause she's so famous - then realised i alredy had it on my offer letter :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Since returning my form and accepting the £402 refund, I have yet to actually receive any money!! I did receive £128 at the end of March, which was a refund of the charges taken in February, but that was all. After a phone call to a lovely lady (Hilary) in the customer service dept, it was agreed that they would send on the rest of the cash, but as it's another department that actually pays you she could only send them an email. I have called again, 2 weeks later, and spoke to the same lady (who was still lovely) who told me they have received her message and that it will be dealt with in time but due to the high number of claims it's taking a while. I really need to get this sorted now. Any ideas? Should I just keep calling them until they cough up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a look at this letter I have used before - you may need to adapt it to your own circumstances.

 

Dear

 

Your Ref:

 

Please accept this correspondence in accordance with my duty under the Civil Procedure Rules to continue to pursue a settlement without the need to invoke the time of the courts.

 

Further to your letter of (date) regarding the settlement offered by you and accepted by me thus far I have not received payment or any explanation as to why not. I consider fourteen working days more than sufficient for a company such as yours, engaged in the business of consumer banking, to be able to process and execute a payment.

 

Take notice that should I not receive payment of the (£ Amount) offered in your letter without delay then I reserve the right to issue a claim against you for the amount of (£ Amount) plus interest pursuant to statute and court costs and without further notice.

 

Finally, should I be forced to litigate I intend to draw the Court’s attention to the fact that you have not made the payment referred to in your offer letter, in addition I will make a formal complaint to the Law Society, the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Banking Code Standards Board and I will submit this letter to the Court as further evidence of your intransigence with my case despite my attempts at settlement and the settling by your company of all other similar claims to date.

 

Yours sincerely/faithfully

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...