Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Longer than 14 days after LBA


REDnrage
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6281 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent my LBA letter on the 8th of January and recieved a letter from Sandy Watt i did'nt recieve anything in the 14 day period after the LBA other than the one from Sandy saying they were looking into it, after which my brother received his claim in full with no court action and he put his claim in after me so i was tempted to leave it a bit longer to see if i got a reply, i rang the Customer relations number and they just told me the Database was down and they could'nt find the information and that they would ring me as soon as it was backup i know this is probably more delaying tactics but why these tactics does this stop me from going ahead with Court proceeding's if i have left it to long in between the LBA? and do i have to start again if so.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

See my post above "Show me the Money". They did exactly the same to me ignoring my LBA. I ended up emailing [email protected] and he came through for me and they settled in full. They have a massive backlog at the moment obviously. I had alreday started my legal aciton and will lose that cash so it may be worth emailing them to see where your claim is at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have given them ample time. you can try sending a 3rd letter as a "goodwill gesture" either by email to sandy watt or tommy mclean given them 7 more days to settle then its court action time.

 

Royal Bank of Scotland

 

 

August 14th, 2006

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

I am writing to you to express my extreme disapoinment in regards a claim I have filed against my branch and yourselves.

I sent a letter requesting a refund of all charges levied against my Interest Paying Current Account on July 24, 2006. I then sent another letter requesting again all charges be refunded on August 8th. Please note that both of these letters were sent via recorded mail and both were signed for at my branch. I have attached a copy of both letters as well as the schedule of charges for your reference. The total I am claiming is £xxxxx

To date I have not recieved a favourable response or any dialogue regarding my claim other than a standard letter. I feel extrememly undervalued as a customer and am shocked at the lack of customer service I am recieving.

Due to recent media coverage, I now believe that your charges are a Penalty, penalty charges being irrecoverable at common law. It has been held that a contractual party can only recover damages for an actual loss or liquidated losses. It is clear that your charges do not reflect any actual and or real loss.

However, if you say that your charges are not penalties, I would be interested if you would demonstrate this by letting me have a full breakdown of the costs to which you have been put by as a result of my breaches, in order to reassure me that your penalties really do reflect your costs. I would be more than happy to receive this via email: blah blah [email protected]

I look forward to hearing from you and to a resolution of this. I will wait for until August 22nd as outlined in the letter dated 8 August 2006 then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

 

Please contact me at the above address or by email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...