Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
    • Confirmed with Central Contact Centre that the hearing is 24th, disappointed I can't speak directly with the local county court I have to email the local court apparently is the only way. The agent couldn't explain the discrepancy between the two letters, she sounded very confused. If they were identical letters in wording but only dates were different I would feel ok, slightly worried the wording differs...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

BoS-tards took my money - now I want it back!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6284 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I'm one unhappy customer! Started proceedings against BoS before Christmas after reading about other claims on the Martin Lawrence website. I must be one of very few sad people to have kept all my statements and therefore had no need to request copies. Judging by others' stories it's just as well I did!

 

So, I sent an initial request for the full amount of £1420 (including interest) on 15th Dec 06, heard nothing by mid Jan, so sent my LBA recorded delivery on 17th Jan 07. Both of these went to my own branch.

 

I recently received a letter from my branch (dated 22nd Jan) saying they have passed my letter to the Customer Relations dept who will respond to me directly. I have heard nothing else.

 

Because the 7 days I gave them are up, I will be proceeding with a claim through the courts. However, I'm still unsure about how exactly I should go about this. I suppose my first decision is whether to go for two Small Claims, or one Summary Cause. I've heard arguments on the side of both, i.e. I'll probably get the money quicker with a Summary Cause, but the Small Claims seem to carry less risk - financially speaking. Any advice from anyone out there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

My first claim against BOS was Small Claims, which I won. My second is Summary Cause, due in court early March. The sheriff clerk in Edinburgh told me i'd have to be the most unluckiest person on the planet if I ended up in court. Said I could loose somewhere in the high hundreds but thought this was very very unlikley. You are right about the almost no risk with Small Claims, I think all you would loose was your £39.00 court fee.

Its really up to you, how quick do you need the cash ?

 

Best wishes with your claim or claim's.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for the advice. Not too bothered about getting the money fast, I mean hey, they've had it for the last 4 years, a few more weeks wont make much difference!

 

So, I think I'll go for small claims option, but my next problem is, my LBA stated that I'd be claiming the full £1420 though the courts. Does it matter if I now put in two separate claims for smaller amounts, instead of one claim for the full amount? I mean, should I have treated the two small claims entirely separately, with two separate LBA's, etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, couple more questions - as my first LBA (to which I have had no reply) stated the figure £1420, should I send another LBA quoting a figure under £750, or just go right ahead and claim?

 

Secondly, is the £750 figure for small claims before or after interest?

 

Thirdly, would I be right in thinking I just need to fill in form 1b?

 

And finally, can anyone advise on how I should fill this in, i.e. direct me towards some previous threads on the same subject?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Miss Universe

 

OK, couple more questions - as my first LBA (to which I have had no reply) stated the figure £1420, should I send another LBA quoting a figure under £750, or just go right ahead and claim?

 

No the prelim and lba should state all charges.

 

Secondly, is the £750 figure for small claims before or after interest?

 

Before judicial interest of 8% can be added at court,but mind and mention it in your POC.

 

Thirdly, would I be right in thinking I just need to fill in form 1b?

 

No you need to fill in form 1 and 1b and have an attached schedule of charges to both these forms.

 

 

And finally, can anyone advise on how I should fill this in, i.e. direct me towards some previous threads on the same subject?

 

The courts are very helpfull regarding filling these forms in, however when you are readyto do this give me a shout and i will help you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi George,

 

Thanks for the answers! I'm now attempting to fill in small claim forms 1 and 1b, and I've just noticed that my first charge was in June 2001. Am I correct in thinking that the Scottish courts only allow claims up to 5 years ago, rather than 6?

 

Also, what should I put in the 'Action for/of' section? I've heard other threads mention 'furthcoming' but haven't a clue what this means. Or is it simply 'payment' I should be after?

 

Next, in the 'defender' section, should I put the branch to which I sent my prelim and LBA (i.e. my local branch)? They've apparently passed my letter to 'Customer Relations' but I've had no contact with them.

 

In section 4, 'Claim' I've entered:

The Pursuer claims from the defender the sum of £739.00 with interest on that sum at the rate of 8% annually from the date of service (together with the expenses of bringing the action).

Is this correct?

 

And finally, I've seen some great threads with examples of what I should enter in the POC section, but I can't find them now! Any advice?

 

Thanks again,

MissUniverse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...