Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Anyone Else Been Told By Rbs ' No Response Till 09/02/07'???


maxibon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6288 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I rang the RBS to check address to put when completing an N1 ( their last day is this Saturday 03/02/07 to respond to LBA) . When I called their was a standard answer phone message stating 'if your claim is regarding charges then please be patient and you will receive a response by the 09/02/07'.!!:eek:

 

Nevertheless I left a message and was told on a callback from a guy at RBS that they do not have enough staff, due to the amount of claims blah that they would not be responding untill then. He didnt even know when I had sent my LBA. I told him that would be too late as I intended to file with court before then.

He then said ' Well I will just note it on your file not to respond or would you be willing to wait till then for a response?' My reply 'I cant do that as I dont know what your response will be do I?'!!!

 

He has apparently noted on my file not to bother responding to me as I will be taking it to court. This was the customer relations team that I spoke to ( same place where Sandy Watt is based).

 

I just wonder how they can say that they will respond by then regardless of when you sent your LBA etc. Baffling!

 

Anyone else had this said to them?? and know why??:confused:

Maxibon

 

 

Gonna take them for all I can and enjoy every second!:lol:

 

 

RBS Account 1- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 20/12/2006

RBS Account 2 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 20/12/2006

RBS Ac1- recvd S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 28/12/2006

Statements recvd Account 1 on 05/01/07

LBA issued for Account 1 on 06/01/07

7 days grace being given till 09/02/07

Still no Response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on Acc 2

Breach on acc 2 DPA request

N1 filed acc 2 28/02/07

Acknowledged 16/03/07

Defense submitted 30/03/07

 

If you need any advice re Moorcroft just ask!! :cool:

 

If I have been of any help and you think I deserve it!

Please click my scales to the left and if you wish leave a comment :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

There appears to be some conflicting info going about...

 

The other week, the standard answerphone message said 'They would be in touch by 31st January'. That and I heard from Sandy Watt's mouth himself that they had significantly cleared a lot of the backlog over the last couple weeks.

 

That was when I spoke to him last week. Hmmmmm... *rubs chin*

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Continue to YOUR schedule - not theirs. They have been given the time; if they fail to get the staff to deal with the letters that is their problem. Onwards and upwards I say and go for it.

 

Kind regards

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

For those who want to go to court, just progress at your pace.

 

For those that don't want to go to court, simply send them a letter saying you will extend your deadline (last chance) by 7 days. You can find an example letter in my "T4FF vs Halifax" thread. Click on my name then "find threads started by T4FF"

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did the same thing with my first claim, sent the Prelim and LBA but then sent a 3rd email directly to tommy mclean telling them "I understand that you are inundated and would for both of our sakes would like to settle out of court. However if I do not recieve a favourable response by blah blah then I will surely be filing a court claim." Full offer letter 2 days later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...